PEG-Asc Vs. SPMC for Bowel Preparation in Capsule-based Procedures
A Prospective Study Comparing Ultra-Low Volume Bowel Preparations for Capsule Colonoscopy and Pan-Intestinal Capsule Endoscopy: Efficacy of 1L Polyethylene Glycol Plus Ascorbic Acid vs. Sodium Picosulfate With Magnesium Citrate
1 other identifier
interventional
220
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical research study is designed to find out which of two different types of bowel preparation works best for people undergoing capsule-based endoscopy procedures. Capsule colonoscopy and pan-intestinal capsule endoscopy ("panendoscopy") are newer, less invasive tests that use a small camera inside a capsule that is swallowed, instead of a traditional colonoscopy that requires a long flexible tube. These tests allow doctors to see the inside of the colon, and in the case of panendoscopy, also the small intestine. They are especially useful when a regular colonoscopy cannot be completed or when doctors need to investigate conditions such as Crohn's disease, anemia, or unexplained bleeding. For these capsule procedures to work well, the bowel needs to be as clean as possible, since the capsule cannot wash or suction away any stool or bubbles. This makes the type of bowel preparation very important, but at present there are no clear recommendations about which preparation to use. Standard preparations often involve large volumes of liquid that patients may find difficult to drink. In recent years, ultra-low-volume preparations (1 liter or less) have been developed to improve patient comfort and make the preparation process easier. In this study, we are comparing two of these ultra-low-volume options: Polyethylene Glycol plus Ascorbic Acid (PEG-Asc), a 1-liter solution and Sodium Picosulfate with Magnesium Citrate (SPMC), a powder mixed with water. We want to see which of these two preparations provides better bowel cleansing for capsule procedures, while also checking which is easier for patients to tolerate. A total of 220 adult patients referred for capsule colonoscopy or panendoscopy were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either PEG-Asc or SPMC. Both groups followed a split-dose schedule, with part of the preparation taken the evening before and part on the morning of the test, along with additional instructions including dietary restrictions, laxative tablets, and clear liquids. The main questions this study is trying to answer are:
- 1.\- Which preparation results in better cleaning of the bowel, allowing clearer pictures from the capsule?
- 2.\- Which preparation is easier for patients to tolerate, with fewer side effects such as nausea or vomiting?
- 3.\- Does the type of preparation affect whether the capsule can complete the examination and reach the end of the colon?
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 3, 2025
CompletedOctober 3, 2025
September 1, 2025
1.5 years
September 25, 2025
September 25, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Adequate bowel cleansing rate assessed by CC-CLEAR scale
Proportion of patients achieving adequate overall bowel cleansing, defined as CC-CLEAR score ≥6 with no segment scoring ≤1.
Within 24 hours of capsule ingestion
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Capsule completion rate
Within 24 hours of capsule ingestion
Patient tolerability
Day of procedure
Adverse events
Within 48 hours of capsule ingestion
Detection of clinically relevant findings
Within 24 hours of capsule ingestion
Study Arms (2)
Polyethylene Glycol plus Ascorbic Acid (PEG-Asc)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive a split-dose bowel preparation with 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (PEG-Asc). The first dose is administered at 20:00 the evening before the procedure (500 mL PEG-Asc solution consumed over 1 hour, followed by 500 mL clear liquids). The second identical dose is taken at 06:00 on the day of the capsule procedure.
Sodium Picosulfate with Magnesium Citrate (SPMC)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants receive a split-dose bowel preparation with sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate (SPMC). The first dose is administered at 20:00 the evening before the procedure (1 sachet dissolved in 150 mL water, followed by 1.5-2 L clear liquids over 1-2 hours). The second identical dose is taken at 06:00 on the day of the capsule procedure.
Interventions
Participants receive a split-dose bowel preparation with 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (PEG-Asc). The first dose is administered at 20:00 the evening before the procedure (500 mL PEG-Asc solution consumed over 1 hour, followed by 500 mL clear liquids). The second identical dose is taken at 06:00 on the day of the capsule procedure.
Participants receive sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) in a split-dose regimen. The first sachet is dissolved in 150 mL water and followed by 1.5-2 L of clear fluids the evening before the procedure, and the second sachet is taken with the same fluid regimen on the morning of the procedure.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults referred for capsule colonoscopy (CC) or pan-intestinal capsule endoscopy (PCE)
- Ability to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Contraindications to capsule endoscopy (e.g., known or suspected gastrointestinal obstruction, strictures, or fistulas)
- Contraindications to the use of PEG-Asc or SPMC (e.g., severe renal impairment, congestive heart failure, electrolyte disturbances, hypersensitivity to study drugs)
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Inability to comply with the bowel preparation protocol
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Ave (ULSAAVE)
Guimarães, 4835-044, Portugal
Related Publications (2)
Vuik FER, Nieuwenburg SAV, Moen S, Spada C, Senore C, Hassan C, Pennazio M, Rondonotti E, Pecere S, Kuipers EJ, Spaander MCW. Colon capsule endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review. Endoscopy. 2021 Aug;53(8):815-824. doi: 10.1055/a-1308-1297. Epub 2021 Jan 13.
PMID: 33440442BACKGROUNDRosa B, Donato H, Curdia Goncalves T, Sousa-Pinto B, Cotter J. What Is the Optimal Bowel Preparation for Capsule Colonoscopy and Pan-intestinal Capsule Endoscopy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Dec;68(12):4418-4431. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-08133-7. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
PMID: 37833441BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
José B Cotter, MD PhD
Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Ave
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MDPhD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 25, 2025
First Posted
October 3, 2025
Study Start
January 1, 2024
Primary Completion
June 30, 2025
Study Completion
August 30, 2025
Last Updated
October 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- IPD and supporting documents will be available beginning 6 months after publication of the primary manuscript and for a period of 5 years thereafter.
- Access Criteria
- Data will be shared through secure transfer after approval of a formal request submitted to the corresponding author.
De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results reported in this study will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. Access will be granted to researchers with methodologically sound proposals for use in scientific research, subject to approval and data-sharing agreements.