NCT07206329

Brief Summary

This clinical research study is designed to find out which of two different types of bowel preparation works best for people undergoing capsule-based endoscopy procedures. Capsule colonoscopy and pan-intestinal capsule endoscopy ("panendoscopy") are newer, less invasive tests that use a small camera inside a capsule that is swallowed, instead of a traditional colonoscopy that requires a long flexible tube. These tests allow doctors to see the inside of the colon, and in the case of panendoscopy, also the small intestine. They are especially useful when a regular colonoscopy cannot be completed or when doctors need to investigate conditions such as Crohn's disease, anemia, or unexplained bleeding. For these capsule procedures to work well, the bowel needs to be as clean as possible, since the capsule cannot wash or suction away any stool or bubbles. This makes the type of bowel preparation very important, but at present there are no clear recommendations about which preparation to use. Standard preparations often involve large volumes of liquid that patients may find difficult to drink. In recent years, ultra-low-volume preparations (1 liter or less) have been developed to improve patient comfort and make the preparation process easier. In this study, we are comparing two of these ultra-low-volume options: Polyethylene Glycol plus Ascorbic Acid (PEG-Asc), a 1-liter solution and Sodium Picosulfate with Magnesium Citrate (SPMC), a powder mixed with water. We want to see which of these two preparations provides better bowel cleansing for capsule procedures, while also checking which is easier for patients to tolerate. A total of 220 adult patients referred for capsule colonoscopy or panendoscopy were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either PEG-Asc or SPMC. Both groups followed a split-dose schedule, with part of the preparation taken the evening before and part on the morning of the test, along with additional instructions including dietary restrictions, laxative tablets, and clear liquids. The main questions this study is trying to answer are:

  1. 1.\- Which preparation results in better cleaning of the bowel, allowing clearer pictures from the capsule?
  2. 2.\- Which preparation is easier for patients to tolerate, with fewer side effects such as nausea or vomiting?
  3. 3.\- Does the type of preparation affect whether the capsule can complete the examination and reach the end of the colon?

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
220

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2024

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 30, 2025

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 25, 2025

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 3, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

October 3, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

September 25, 2025

Last Update Submit

September 25, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Capsule ColonoscopyPan-intestinal Capsule EndoscopyBowel CleansingUltra-low-volume Bowel PreparationPolyethylene Glycol plus Ascorbic AcidSodium Picosulfate with Magnesium Citrate

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Adequate bowel cleansing rate assessed by CC-CLEAR scale

    Proportion of patients achieving adequate overall bowel cleansing, defined as CC-CLEAR score ≥6 with no segment scoring ≤1.

    Within 24 hours of capsule ingestion

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Capsule completion rate

    Within 24 hours of capsule ingestion

  • Patient tolerability

    Day of procedure

  • Adverse events

    Within 48 hours of capsule ingestion

  • Detection of clinically relevant findings

    Within 24 hours of capsule ingestion

Study Arms (2)

Polyethylene Glycol plus Ascorbic Acid (PEG-Asc)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants receive a split-dose bowel preparation with 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (PEG-Asc). The first dose is administered at 20:00 the evening before the procedure (500 mL PEG-Asc solution consumed over 1 hour, followed by 500 mL clear liquids). The second identical dose is taken at 06:00 on the day of the capsule procedure.

Drug: Polyethylene Glycol plus Ascorbic Acid (PEG-Asc)

Sodium Picosulfate with Magnesium Citrate (SPMC)

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants receive a split-dose bowel preparation with sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate (SPMC). The first dose is administered at 20:00 the evening before the procedure (1 sachet dissolved in 150 mL water, followed by 1.5-2 L clear liquids over 1-2 hours). The second identical dose is taken at 06:00 on the day of the capsule procedure.

Drug: Sodium Picosulfate with Magnesium Citrate (SPMC)

Interventions

Participants receive a split-dose bowel preparation with 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbic acid (PEG-Asc). The first dose is administered at 20:00 the evening before the procedure (500 mL PEG-Asc solution consumed over 1 hour, followed by 500 mL clear liquids). The second identical dose is taken at 06:00 on the day of the capsule procedure.

Also known as: 1L PEG with Ascorbate
Polyethylene Glycol plus Ascorbic Acid (PEG-Asc)

Participants receive sodium picosulfate with magnesium citrate (SPMC) in a split-dose regimen. The first sachet is dissolved in 150 mL water and followed by 1.5-2 L of clear fluids the evening before the procedure, and the second sachet is taken with the same fluid regimen on the morning of the procedure.

Also known as: SPMC, Sodium Picosulfate + Mg Citrate
Sodium Picosulfate with Magnesium Citrate (SPMC)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults referred for capsule colonoscopy (CC) or pan-intestinal capsule endoscopy (PCE)
  • Ability to provide informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Contraindications to capsule endoscopy (e.g., known or suspected gastrointestinal obstruction, strictures, or fistulas)
  • Contraindications to the use of PEG-Asc or SPMC (e.g., severe renal impairment, congestive heart failure, electrolyte disturbances, hypersensitivity to study drugs)
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Inability to comply with the bowel preparation protocol

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Ave (ULSAAVE)

Guimarães, 4835-044, Portugal

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Vuik FER, Nieuwenburg SAV, Moen S, Spada C, Senore C, Hassan C, Pennazio M, Rondonotti E, Pecere S, Kuipers EJ, Spaander MCW. Colon capsule endoscopy in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review. Endoscopy. 2021 Aug;53(8):815-824. doi: 10.1055/a-1308-1297. Epub 2021 Jan 13.

    PMID: 33440442BACKGROUND
  • Rosa B, Donato H, Curdia Goncalves T, Sousa-Pinto B, Cotter J. What Is the Optimal Bowel Preparation for Capsule Colonoscopy and Pan-intestinal Capsule Endoscopy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Dec;68(12):4418-4431. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-08133-7. Epub 2023 Oct 13.

    PMID: 37833441BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Polyethylene GlycolsAscorbic Acidpicosulfate sodiummagnesium citrate

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ethylene GlycolsGlycolsAlcoholsOrganic ChemicalsPolymersMacromolecular SubstancesBiomedical and Dental MaterialsManufactured MaterialsTechnology, Industry, and AgricultureSugar AcidsAcids, AcyclicCarboxylic AcidsHydroxy AcidsCarbohydrates

Study Officials

  • José B Cotter, MD PhD

    Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Ave

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MDPhD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2025

First Posted

October 3, 2025

Study Start

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion

June 30, 2025

Study Completion

August 30, 2025

Last Updated

October 3, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the results reported in this study will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author. Access will be granted to researchers with methodologically sound proposals for use in scientific research, subject to approval and data-sharing agreements.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
IPD and supporting documents will be available beginning 6 months after publication of the primary manuscript and for a period of 5 years thereafter.
Access Criteria
Data will be shared through secure transfer after approval of a formal request submitted to the corresponding author.
More information

Locations