Individualised Endometrial Cancer Risk Stratification by Bayesian Prediction Model (ENDORISK), Optimizing Clinical Implementation
ENDORISK-I
ENDORISK Clinical Implementation Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
735
1 country
14
Brief Summary
Rationale: Preoperative identification of patients at risk for lymph node metastasis (LNM) is challenging in endometrial cancer (EC). Therefore, a Bayesian network model called ENDORISK was developed and validated in three external cohorts to improve preoperative risk stratification. The next step is to implement and evaluate whether use of the model improves daily clinical practice. Objective: The ENDORISK implementation (ENDORISK-I) study aims to prospectively evaluate whether implementation of ENDORISK in daily clinical practice improves preoperative risk stratification. Study design: A stepped wedge non inferiority study in which two oncology regions will consecutively start implementation of ENDORISK with one year interval. The ENDORISK model will be filled in and used in preoperative treatment counselling. Results will be compared to current standard clinical care which is prospectively evaluated in both regions since March 2022 in the 'evaluation of care in endometrial cancer' study (2021-7400). Study population: all consecutive patients recently diagnosed with early stage EC who are eligible for surgical treatment, who understand Dutch and are able to fill in a digital or paper questionnaire can be included. Main study parameters/endpoints: The ENDORISK implementation (ENDORISK-I) study aims to prospectively evaluate implementation of ENDORISK in daily clinical practice by investigating:
- The proportion of identified LNM in patients with lymph node staging (positive predictive value (PPV)) compared to standard care
- Proportion of patients who decide to have lymph node status assessed in ENDORISK care compared to standard care
- Preoperative information provision for patients and shared-decision making with the use of ENDORISK compared to standard care
- Patients' disease- specific-, overall survival, and health-related quality of life compared to standard care
- Patients' and doctors' use of and experiences with the ENDORISK-model
- Impact of ENDORISK on regional care costs
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2025
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
14 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 23, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 23, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 16, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 16, 2032
March 27, 2026
July 1, 2025
2 years
July 23, 2025
March 25, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Proportion of patients who decide to have lymph node status assessed in ENDORISK care compared to standard care.
from enrolment to surgery
Proportion of patients with lymph node metastases within patients undergoing lymph node staging (the positive predictive value) in ENDORISK care
The lymph node metastases in patients undergoing lymph node staging will be determined by pathology report on the surgical specimen. The positive predicting value will be compared to the positive predictive value of standard care.
From enrolment to time of surgery
Preoperative information provision for patients and shared-decision making with the use of ENDORISK compared to standard care, measured by questionnaires.
Information provision score: Questionnaire EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-INFO25 with additional questions specific to ENDORISK use. Shared-decision making score: Shared Decision Making Questionnaire SDM-Q-9 with additional questions specific to ENDORISK use
From enrolment to 12 weeks post-operatively
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Patients' 5-year disease- specific-, overall survival (DSS, OS), compared to standard care;
from enrolment to 5-year post surgery
Health related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to standard care
12 weeks after primary surgery
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to standard care
12 months after primary surgery
Treatment-related morbidity compared to standard care
12 weeks after primary surgery
Treatment related morbidity compared to standard care
12 months after primary surgery
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (2)
Charlson-index
12 weeks after primary surgery
Health literacy
12 weeks after primary surgery
Study Arms (2)
Control
NO INTERVENTIONThe control arm is a group of patients from our previous 'evaluation of care' study which underwent standard care for endometrial cancer between march of 2022 and the start of the ENDORISK-I study. This group serves as a control group for the intervention arm.
Intervention
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention group are patients receiving a personalized risk on lymph node metastases as predicted by the ENDORISK model, they also receive a treatment plan (hysterectomy + bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with or without lymph node surgery) based on this personalized risk.
Interventions
The intervention group are patients receiving a personalized risk on lymph node metastases as predicted by the ENDORISK model, they also receive a treatment plan (hysterectomy + bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with or without lymph node surgery) based on this personalized risk.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosed with early stage (FIGO stage I-II) endometrial carcinoma (every grade permitted)
- Eligible for primary surgical treatment (neo-adjuvant therapy is permitted)
You may not qualify if:
- Unable to give informed consent
- No understanding of Dutch or English language
- Rare types of endometrial cancer, such as endometrial stroma cell sarcoma
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Radboud University Medical Centerlead
- St. Anna Ziekenhuis, Geldrop, Netherlandscollaborator
- Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, s'-Hertogenboschcollaborator
- Rijnstate Hospitalcollaborator
- Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuiscollaborator
- Amphia Hospitalcollaborator
- Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhovencollaborator
- Elkerliek Hospitalcollaborator
- Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis (CWZ)collaborator
- Maxima Medical Centercollaborator
- Bernhoven Hospitalcollaborator
- Maas Hospital Panteincollaborator
- Slingeland Hospitalcollaborator
- Streekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrixcollaborator
- Gelderse Vallei Hospitalcollaborator
- Comprehensive Cancer Centre The Netherlandscollaborator
- Stichting PAMMcollaborator
Study Sites (14)
Rijnstate
Arnhem, Gelderland, Netherlands
Slingeland Hospital
Doetinchem, Gelderland, Netherlands
Gelderse Vallei
Ede, Gelderland, Netherlands
Radboudumc
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525GA, Netherlands
Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis (CWZ)
Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands
Streekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrix
Winterswijk, Gelderland, Netherlands
Jeroen Bosch Hospital
's-Hertogenbosch, North Brabant, Netherlands
Amphia
Breda, North Brabant, Netherlands
Catharina Hospital
Eindhoven, North Brabant, Netherlands
St. Anna Hospital
Geldrop, North Brabant, Netherlands
Elkerliek Hospital
Helmond, North Brabant, Netherlands
Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital
Tilburg, North Brabant, Netherlands
Bernhoven Hospital
Uden, North Brabant, Netherlands
Maxima Medical Center
Veldhoven, North Brabant, Netherlands
Related Publications (3)
Vinklerova P, Ovesna P, Hausnerova J, Pijnenborg JMA, Lucas PJF, Reijnen C, Vrede S, Weinberger V. External validation study of endometrial cancer preoperative risk stratification model (ENDORISK). Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 3;12:939226. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.939226. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 35992828BACKGROUNDReijnen C, Gogou E, Visser NCM, Engerud H, Ramjith J, van der Putten LJM, van de Vijver K, Santacana M, Bronsert P, Bulten J, Hirschfeld M, Colas E, Gil-Moreno A, Reques A, Mancebo G, Krakstad C, Trovik J, Haldorsen IS, Huvila J, Koskas M, Weinberger V, Bednarikova M, Hausnerova J, van der Wurff AAM, Matias-Guiu X, Amant F; ENITEC Consortium; Massuger LFAG, Snijders MPLM, Kusters-Vandevelde HVN, Lucas PJF, Pijnenborg JMA. Preoperative risk stratification in endometrial cancer (ENDORISK) by a Bayesian network model: A development and validation study. PLoS Med. 2020 May 15;17(5):e1003111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003111. eCollection 2020 May.
PMID: 32413043BACKGROUNDGrube M, Reijnen C, Lucas PJF, Kommoss F, Kommoss FKF, Brucker SY, Walter CB, Oberlechner E, Kramer B, Andress J, Neis F, Staebler A, Pijnenborg JMA, Kommoss S. Improved preoperative risk stratification in endometrial carcinoma patients: external validation of the ENDORISK Bayesian network model in a large population-based case series. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul;149(7):3361-3369. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04218-4. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
PMID: 35939115BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 23, 2025
First Posted
October 1, 2025
Study Start
October 23, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 16, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 16, 2032
Last Updated
March 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- IPD will be available after the end of the study.
- Access Criteria
- Researchers within the RadboudUMC will be able to get access upon request and review of research aim/protocol
Only anonymized datasets (without patient numbers, date of birth or name) will be shared with other people relevant to the study or relevant to additional studies as reported in the patient information folder. Patients are requested whether or not they give permission to use anonymized data from this study for further research into cervical cancer.