NCT07194707

Brief Summary

This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the impact of operating room noise on bispectral index (BIS) and hemodynamic parameters in patients undergoing general anesthesia. Environmental noise in operating rooms, often overlooked, may influence anesthesia depth, patient safety, and physiological stability. A total of 70 adult patients (ASA I-II, 18-65 years, elective surgery under general anesthesia) will be enrolled at Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital. Patients will be categorized into two groups based on intraoperative average noise levels: noisy group (\>65 dB) and quiet group (\<55 dB). Noise levels will be measured every 10 minutes using a CEM DT-8850 sound level meter, BIS will be recorded every 10 minutes, and hemodynamic variables (systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressure, and heart rate) will be recorded every 5 minutes. Primary outcome is the correlation between mean intraoperative noise levels (LAeq) and BIS values during the maintenance phase of anesthesia. Secondary outcomes include the relationship between noise characteristics (e.g., device-related, human-related, alarms, media) and hemodynamic stability, as well as surgical branch-related noise classifications (high, moderate, low). The study is non-interventional, with no additional risk to participants beyond standard clinical monitoring. Findings are expected to provide evidence on the role of environmental noise in anesthesia quality, inform operating room organization, and contribute to patient safety improvements.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2026

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 19, 2025

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 26, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2026

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 30, 2026

Completed
2 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

January 6, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

September 19, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 3, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Anesthesia, GeneralOperating RoomsMonitoring, IntraoperativeHemodynamicsBispectral Index (BIS)Noise Exposure

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Correlation between intraoperative noise levels and BIS values

    Relationship between mean intraoperative noise levels (LAeq, dB(A)) and mean Bispectral Index (BIS) values during the maintenance phase of general anesthesia.

    10-minute intervals intraoperative period

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Relationship between intraoperative noise levels and hemodynamic parameters

    Intraoperative period

  • Effect of noise source type on BIS and hemodynamic stability

    Intraoperative period.

  • Comparison of BIS and hemodynamic outcomes across surgical branches

    Intraoperative period.

Study Arms (2)

1 (Noisy Group)

Patients exposed to average OR noise level \>65 dB during general anesthesia.

Other: Intraoperative Noise Monitoring

2 (Quiet Group)

Patients exposed to average OR noise level \<55 dB during general anesthesia.

Other: Intraoperative Noise Monitoring

Interventions

Noise levels will be passively measured during surgery using a calibrated sound level meter (CEM DT-8850) placed near the patient's head. Measurements will be taken every 10 minutes without physical contact or interference with clinical care. The procedure is purely observational and does not modify anesthesia or surgical practice.

Also known as: CEM DT-8850 Sound Level Meter, Operating Room Noise Measurement
1 (Noisy Group)2 (Quiet Group)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Adult patients aged 18-70 years undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia at Başakşehir Çam and Sakura City Hospital will be included. Eligible participants must have ASA physical status I-II, be cognitively able to provide informed consent, and scheduled for surgeries lasting up to 2 hours. Both male and female patients will be enrolled without restriction. Only elective (non-emergency) procedures are considered. Surgeries from multiple specialties (orthopedics, neurosurgery, cardiovascular, general surgery, gynecology, urology, ophthalmology, otolaryngology, plastic surgery, dermatology) will be included, representing high, moderate, and low noise exposure categories.

You may qualify if:

  • Adults aged 18-70
  • ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status score I-II
  • Scheduled for elective surgery
  • To be undergoing general anesthesia
  • Having signed the informed consent form to participate in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Hearing impairment or ear pathology
  • History of neurological disease (epilepsy, stroke, dementia, etc.)
  • Use of psychiatric medications (anxiolytics, antidepressants, antipsychotics, etc.)
  • Indications for emergency surgery
  • Planned spinal or epidural anesthesia
  • Conditions unsuitable for BIS monitoring
  • Cognitive impairment preventing informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (4)

  • Li X, Li J, Xu Z, Shang Y, Shi H. Effects of Operating Room Noise on Patient Outcomes and Medical Staff: A Systematic Review. Noise Health. 2025 May-Jun 01;27(126):246-254. doi: 10.4103/nah.nah_175_24. Epub 2025 Jun 26.

    PMID: 40574295BACKGROUND
  • You S, Xu F, Zhu X, Qin S, Zheng X, Tao C, Wu Y, Chen Y, Shu B, Huang H, Duan G. Effect of intraoperative noise on postoperative pain in surgery patients under general anesthesia: evidence from a prospective study and mouse model. Int J Surg. 2023 Dec 1;109(12):3872-3882. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000672.

    PMID: 37598384BACKGROUND
  • Jeyaraman M, Jeyaraman N, Yadav S, Nallakumarasamy A, Iyengar KP, Jain V. Impact of Excessive Noise Generation in Orthopaedic Operating Theatres: A Comprehensive Review. Cureus. 2024 Feb 19;16(2):e54469. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54469. eCollection 2024 Feb.

    PMID: 38510860BACKGROUND
  • Louis M, Grabill N, Strom P, Gibson B. Leading Through Noise: Operating Room Noise Challenges for Staff and Leadership Techniques to Ensure Optimal Operational Performance. Cureus. 2024 Sep 17;16(9):e69569. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69569. eCollection 2024 Sep.

    PMID: 39421089BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Emine Ozcan, MD

    Başakşehir Çam & Sakura City Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
1 Day
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 19, 2025

First Posted

September 26, 2025

Study Start

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion

May 30, 2026

Study Completion

June 1, 2026

Last Updated

January 6, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to privacy and confidentiality concerns. Only aggregated results will be published in scientific journals and conferences.