Return to Work After Lumbar Surgery: a Nationwide Survey of Spinal Surgeons' Practices
1 other identifier
observational
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This national cross-sectional survey investigates the current practices and perceptions of Belgian spinal surgeons regarding return to work (RTW) after lumbar surgery for radicular pain. The study aims to (1) assess surgeons' advice on RTW and sick leave, (2) identify barriers and facilitators encountered when providing RTW guidance, and (3) explore how these factors relate to surgeon characteristics such as demographics, hospital setting, and professional experience. The results will inform clinical practice recommendations and support the development of targeted interventions to improve RTW guidance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Oct 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 26, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 2, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 26, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 26, 2026
CompletedApril 29, 2026
April 1, 2026
7 months
September 10, 2025
April 28, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Reported practices regarding return to work advice and sick leave following lumbar surgery
Measured using a custom-designed online questionnaire. Topics include timing of advice, recommended duration of sick leave, and content of return-to-work guidance. Results reported as frequencies and percentages.
Through study completion, an average of 3 months (anticipated January 2026)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Reported barriers and facilitators to providing return to work guidance
Through study completion, an average of 3 months (anticipated January 2026)
Surgeon demographics and practice characteristics
Through study completion, an average of 3 months (anticipated January 2026)
Reported confidence and perceived responsibility in discussing return to work
Through study completion, an average of 3 months (anticipated January 2026)
Study Arms (1)
Belgian spinal surgeons
Belgian spinal surgeons who are members of the Spine Society of Belgium (SSBe). The survey will be distributed through the SSBe membership list.
Eligibility Criteria
Belgian spinal surgeons (orthopaedic surgeons and neurosurgeons) who perform lumbar surgery.
You may qualify if:
- Orthopaedic surgeons or neurosurgeons who perform lumbar surgery in Belgium.
- Members or affiliates of the Spine Society of Belgium (SSBe), as survey distribution will occur through the SSBe member list.
- Willing to participate in the survey, as evidenced by voluntary completion of the online questionnaire. Informed consent is implied after reading the participant information sheet.
You may not qualify if:
- Surgeons not performing lumbar surgery.
- Surgeons not affiliated with SSBe.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
UZ Leuven
Leuven, 3000, Belgium
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sofie Rummens, MD, PhD
UZ Leuven
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 10, 2025
First Posted
September 26, 2025
Study Start
October 2, 2025
Primary Completion
April 26, 2026
Study Completion
April 26, 2026
Last Updated
April 29, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The study involves a small professional population (Belgian spinal surgeons), where sharing individual-level responses could risk indirect identification despite anonymization. Only aggregated, group-level results will be reported.