AI and Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Evaluating the Clinical Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Safety in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
70
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Today, the majority of gallbladder removals surgeries are done using minimally invasive techniques through small cuts to help patients recover faster. However, these procedures are technically more challenging because surgeons have a restricted view of the patient's anatomy, which can increase the risk of serious complications. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have been developed to guide surgeons during surgery and help them make safer decisions that reduce the risk of injury to the patient. This study will use a randomized controlled trial to compare outcomes between surgeries with AI assistance and standard procedures without AI. Primary Objective: To determine whether the AI improves surgeons' ability to achieve the Critical View of Safety, a key step for safe gallbladder removal, compared to standard procedures. Secondary Objectives:
- Determine whether the AI helps the surgeon perform more safe dissections compared to the standard procedures.
- Collect surgeon feedback on the use of AI during the procedure
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Sep 2025
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 17, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 30, 2026
January 13, 2026
January 1, 2026
10 months
September 13, 2025
January 12, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Critical View of Safety Achievement Rate
Blinded expert surgeons will review the laparoscopic video recordings to determine whether the Critical View of Safety (CVS) was fully achieved, defined as meeting all three required criteria. The proportion of cases with fully achieved CVS in the intervention group will be compared with the proportion in the control group.
Post-procedure through study completion (up to 1 year)
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Dissections above Line of Safety
Post-procedure through study completion (up to 1 year)
Surgeon-reported outcomes
Immediately after the procedure
Observer-reported outcomes
During the procedure
Post-operative chart review
Up to 30 days post-procedure.
Study Arms (2)
Standard Surgical Procedure
NO INTERVENTIONSurgeons/fellows will perform the procedure, as per standard care measures.
Artificial Intelligence Feedback
EXPERIMENTALSurgeons or fellows in the intervention group will have access to two AI models during their procedure. A research coordinator will operate and monitor the AI models, which are displayed on a single monitor in the operating room. Participants may request to toggle between models or turn them off at any point during the procedure, as per their needs.
Interventions
The intervention will involve the use of two artificial intelligence (AI) models to provide surgical guidance during laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures. The AI models will provide real-time feedback based on the live surgical feed (internal patient anatomy captured by laparoscopic camera) displayed on an operating room monitor. The GoNoGoNet model identifies safe and unsafe zones of dissection. This is done by showcasing a green overlay over safe zones of dissection, and a red overlay over unsafe zones of dissection. The DeepCVS model provides text-based feedback based on its assessment of the following three criteria defining the Critical View of Safety: 1) complete clearance of the hepatocystic triangle from fat and fibrous tissue, 2) only two structures visible entering the gallbladder (cystic artery and duct) and 3) the lower third of the gallbladder must be dissected off the liver bed, exposing the cystic plate.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Surgeon participants: Attending surgeons or fellows that perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy at University Health Network.
- Patients participants: Adults 18 years of age and over, scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery.
You may not qualify if:
- Surgeon participants: Anyone who is not a surgeon or fellow at University Health Network or that does not perform laparoscopic cholecystectomies.
- Patient participants: Any patient who is not having a laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Toronto General Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada
Toronto Western Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, Canada
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Endocrine and Acute Care Surgeon and Researcher at The Institute for Education Research
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2025
First Posted
September 22, 2025
Study Start
September 17, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 30, 2026
Last Updated
January 13, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01