NCT07186803

Brief Summary

Today, the majority of gallbladder removals surgeries are done using minimally invasive techniques through small cuts to help patients recover faster. However, these procedures are technically more challenging because surgeons have a restricted view of the patient's anatomy, which can increase the risk of serious complications. Artificial intelligence (AI) tools have been developed to guide surgeons during surgery and help them make safer decisions that reduce the risk of injury to the patient. This study will use a randomized controlled trial to compare outcomes between surgeries with AI assistance and standard procedures without AI. Primary Objective: To determine whether the AI improves surgeons' ability to achieve the Critical View of Safety, a key step for safe gallbladder removal, compared to standard procedures. Secondary Objectives:

  • Determine whether the AI helps the surgeon perform more safe dissections compared to the standard procedures.
  • Collect surgeon feedback on the use of AI during the procedure

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_3

Timeline
3mo left

Started Sep 2025

Shorter than P25 for phase_3

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress74%
Sep 2025Jul 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 13, 2025

Completed
4 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 17, 2025

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 22, 2025

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 30, 2026

Expected
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 30, 2026

Last Updated

January 13, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

September 13, 2025

Last Update Submit

January 12, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

artificial intelligencelaparoscopic cholecystectomysafetycritical view of safetyline of safety

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Critical View of Safety Achievement Rate

    Blinded expert surgeons will review the laparoscopic video recordings to determine whether the Critical View of Safety (CVS) was fully achieved, defined as meeting all three required criteria. The proportion of cases with fully achieved CVS in the intervention group will be compared with the proportion in the control group.

    Post-procedure through study completion (up to 1 year)

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Dissections above Line of Safety

    Post-procedure through study completion (up to 1 year)

  • Surgeon-reported outcomes

    Immediately after the procedure

  • Observer-reported outcomes

    During the procedure

  • Post-operative chart review

    Up to 30 days post-procedure.

Study Arms (2)

Standard Surgical Procedure

NO INTERVENTION

Surgeons/fellows will perform the procedure, as per standard care measures.

Artificial Intelligence Feedback

EXPERIMENTAL

Surgeons or fellows in the intervention group will have access to two AI models during their procedure. A research coordinator will operate and monitor the AI models, which are displayed on a single monitor in the operating room. Participants may request to toggle between models or turn them off at any point during the procedure, as per their needs.

Device: Artificial Intelligence Guidance Models

Interventions

The intervention will involve the use of two artificial intelligence (AI) models to provide surgical guidance during laparoscopic cholecystectomy procedures. The AI models will provide real-time feedback based on the live surgical feed (internal patient anatomy captured by laparoscopic camera) displayed on an operating room monitor. The GoNoGoNet model identifies safe and unsafe zones of dissection. This is done by showcasing a green overlay over safe zones of dissection, and a red overlay over unsafe zones of dissection. The DeepCVS model provides text-based feedback based on its assessment of the following three criteria defining the Critical View of Safety: 1) complete clearance of the hepatocystic triangle from fat and fibrous tissue, 2) only two structures visible entering the gallbladder (cystic artery and duct) and 3) the lower third of the gallbladder must be dissected off the liver bed, exposing the cystic plate.

Artificial Intelligence Feedback

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Surgeon participants: Attending surgeons or fellows that perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy at University Health Network.
  • Patients participants: Adults 18 years of age and over, scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery.

You may not qualify if:

  • Surgeon participants: Anyone who is not a surgeon or fellow at University Health Network or that does not perform laparoscopic cholecystectomies.
  • Patient participants: Any patient who is not having a laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Toronto General Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada

RECRUITING

Toronto Western Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2S8, Canada

RECRUITING

Central Study Contacts

Ariana Walji, BSc, MSc Candidate

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Parallel Cluster Design with Stratified Randomization. Each cluster will consist of one surgeon attending or fellow. Clusters are stratified based on professional characteristics (Eg. experience level) before randomization to the intervention or control group.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Endocrine and Acute Care Surgeon and Researcher at The Institute for Education Research

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2025

First Posted

September 22, 2025

Study Start

September 17, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 30, 2026

Last Updated

January 13, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Locations