NCT07185087

Brief Summary

Comparison between two bracket prescription systems, MBT and DAMON Ultima brackets and evaluate whether the changes incorporated in DAMON Ultima brackets can drive earlier improvement on teeth position, clinically visual progression of treatment, during initial stage of treatment. Another aim of this study is the effect of chosen bracket system on patient compliance.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
34

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 21, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 22, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 25, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 24, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

August 21, 2025

Last Update Submit

September 19, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Damon UltimaPatient ComplianceMBT bracketleveling and alignment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Degree of orthodontic treatment improvement assessed using ABO Discrepancy Index

    Description: Evaluation of improvement in tooth rotation/alignment, overjet, overbite, occlusal relationship, interproximal contact, and cephalometric parameters. Time Frame: At multiple time intervals during the alignment stage (up to 6 months). Method: American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index scoring system. Unit of Measure: DI points

    6 months

  • Reduction in Malocclusion Assessed by Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index

    Description: Measurement of the rate of dental alignment during treatment. Time Frame: At multiple time intervals during the alignment stage (up to 6 months). Method: Standardized PAR scoring applied to digital dental casts. Unit of Measure: PAR score

    6 months

  • Improvement in Malocclusion Severity Assessed by Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN-DHC)

    Description: Comparison of treatment need improvement before treatment and after completion of the alignment stage. Time Frame: Baseline and after alignment stage (approximately 6 months). Method: IOTN-DHC assessment. Unit of Measure: IOTN grade.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Changes in Oral Hygiene and Gingival Health During Treatment

    6 months

  • Incidence of Bracket Bonding Failures During Treatment

    6 months

  • Patient Pain Perception During Orthodontic Treatment

    6 months

  • Patient-Reported Smile Attractiveness and Confidence

    6 months

Study Arms (2)

Damon

EXPERIMENTAL

Damon Ultima Self-ligating Brackets

Device: passive self-ligating, Damon Ultima brackets

MBT

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

MBT Mini Diamond Conventional brackets

Device: Conventional ligation, MBT brackets

Interventions

Patients will receive Damon Ultima self-ligating brackets (Ormco Corp., Glendora, California, USA) bonded from the second molar to the second molar in each arch. Archwires will follow a standardized sequence: 0.014-inch CuNiTi, 0.018-inch CuNiTi, and 0.014 × 0.0275-inch CuNiTi (Ormco Corp., Glendora, California, USA). All bonding procedures will follow a standardized protocol, including enamel cleaning, acid etching, primer application (Ortho Solo), and adhesive curing (Green Glow).

Damon

Patients will receive MBT Mini Diamond brackets (Ormco Corp., Glendora, California, USA) bonded in the same manner, with the same archwire sequence.

MBT

Eligibility Criteria

Age16 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Both gender
  • Age range between 16-40years of age.
  • ANB angle not \<1° and not \>5°.
  • Mild to moderate crowding, spacing and rotation.
  • Requiring non-extraction treatment.
  • The patient agreed to be part of this study.

You may not qualify if:

  • A history of previous orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance.
  • Permanent teeth extraction except third molar.
  • Congenital anomaly.
  • Cleft lip and palate patients.
  • Patients with ectopic canine or other teeth.
  • Patients with severe crowding (\<6mm).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Baghdad/ Collage of Dentistry

Baghdad, Iraq, 10047, Iraq

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Moyano J, Montagut D, Perera R, Fernandez-Bozal J, Puigdollers A. Comparison of changes in the dental transverse and sagittal planes between patients treated with self-ligating and with conventional brackets. Dental Press J Orthod. 2020 Jan-Feb;25(1):47-55. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.25.1.047-055.oar.

    PMID: 32215477BACKGROUND
  • Coenen FA, Bartz JR, Niederau C, Craveiro RB, Knaup I, Wolf M. Orthodontic treatment quality evaluated by partially automated digital IOTN and PAR index determination: a retrospective multicentre study. Eur J Orthod. 2023 May 31;45(3):308-316. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjac064.

    PMID: 36308300BACKGROUND
  • Barbosa IV, Ladewig VM, Almeida-Pedrin RR, Cardoso MA, Santiago Junior JF, Conti ACCF. The association between patient's compliance and age with the bonding failure of orthodontic brackets: a cross-sectional study. Prog Orthod. 2018 May 1;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40510-018-0209-1.

    PMID: 29713922BACKGROUND
  • Jahanbin A, Hasanzadeh N, Khaki S, Shafaee H. Comparison of self-ligating Damon3 and conventional MBT brackets regarding alignment efficiency and pain experience: A randomized clinical trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2019 Fall;13(4):281-288. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2019.043.

    PMID: 32190212BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Patient Compliance

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Patient Acceptance of Health CareTreatment Adherence and ComplianceHealth BehaviorBehavior

Study Officials

  • Jehan F. IBrahim

    University of Baghdad

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Hadeel A. Al-lami, Asst Prof.

    University of Baghdad

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator, Orthodontics Department, University of Baghdad

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2025

First Posted

September 22, 2025

Study Start

April 1, 2025

Primary Completion

October 25, 2025

Study Completion

December 1, 2025

Last Updated

September 24, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

No Plan to Share IPD because this trial is a prospective study and yet we can't promise for any sharing

Locations