Damon vs MBT Braces: Patient Compliance and Treatment Efficiency
Evaluation of Treatment Progress and the Compliance of Patients Treated With DAMON Braces Versus Patients Treated With MBT Braces During Early Stage of Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
34
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Comparison between two bracket prescription systems, MBT and DAMON Ultima brackets and evaluate whether the changes incorporated in DAMON Ultima brackets can drive earlier improvement on teeth position, clinically visual progression of treatment, during initial stage of treatment. Another aim of this study is the effect of chosen bracket system on patient compliance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 21, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedSeptember 24, 2025
September 1, 2025
7 months
August 21, 2025
September 19, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Degree of orthodontic treatment improvement assessed using ABO Discrepancy Index
Description: Evaluation of improvement in tooth rotation/alignment, overjet, overbite, occlusal relationship, interproximal contact, and cephalometric parameters. Time Frame: At multiple time intervals during the alignment stage (up to 6 months). Method: American Board of Orthodontics Discrepancy Index scoring system. Unit of Measure: DI points
6 months
Reduction in Malocclusion Assessed by Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index
Description: Measurement of the rate of dental alignment during treatment. Time Frame: At multiple time intervals during the alignment stage (up to 6 months). Method: Standardized PAR scoring applied to digital dental casts. Unit of Measure: PAR score
6 months
Improvement in Malocclusion Severity Assessed by Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN-DHC)
Description: Comparison of treatment need improvement before treatment and after completion of the alignment stage. Time Frame: Baseline and after alignment stage (approximately 6 months). Method: IOTN-DHC assessment. Unit of Measure: IOTN grade.
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Changes in Oral Hygiene and Gingival Health During Treatment
6 months
Incidence of Bracket Bonding Failures During Treatment
6 months
Patient Pain Perception During Orthodontic Treatment
6 months
Patient-Reported Smile Attractiveness and Confidence
6 months
Study Arms (2)
Damon
EXPERIMENTALDamon Ultima Self-ligating Brackets
MBT
ACTIVE COMPARATORMBT Mini Diamond Conventional brackets
Interventions
Patients will receive Damon Ultima self-ligating brackets (Ormco Corp., Glendora, California, USA) bonded from the second molar to the second molar in each arch. Archwires will follow a standardized sequence: 0.014-inch CuNiTi, 0.018-inch CuNiTi, and 0.014 × 0.0275-inch CuNiTi (Ormco Corp., Glendora, California, USA). All bonding procedures will follow a standardized protocol, including enamel cleaning, acid etching, primer application (Ortho Solo), and adhesive curing (Green Glow).
Patients will receive MBT Mini Diamond brackets (Ormco Corp., Glendora, California, USA) bonded in the same manner, with the same archwire sequence.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Both gender
- Age range between 16-40years of age.
- ANB angle not \<1° and not \>5°.
- Mild to moderate crowding, spacing and rotation.
- Requiring non-extraction treatment.
- The patient agreed to be part of this study.
You may not qualify if:
- A history of previous orthodontic treatment with fixed appliance.
- Permanent teeth extraction except third molar.
- Congenital anomaly.
- Cleft lip and palate patients.
- Patients with ectopic canine or other teeth.
- Patients with severe crowding (\<6mm).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Baghdad/ Collage of Dentistry
Baghdad, Iraq, 10047, Iraq
Related Publications (4)
Moyano J, Montagut D, Perera R, Fernandez-Bozal J, Puigdollers A. Comparison of changes in the dental transverse and sagittal planes between patients treated with self-ligating and with conventional brackets. Dental Press J Orthod. 2020 Jan-Feb;25(1):47-55. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.25.1.047-055.oar.
PMID: 32215477BACKGROUNDCoenen FA, Bartz JR, Niederau C, Craveiro RB, Knaup I, Wolf M. Orthodontic treatment quality evaluated by partially automated digital IOTN and PAR index determination: a retrospective multicentre study. Eur J Orthod. 2023 May 31;45(3):308-316. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjac064.
PMID: 36308300BACKGROUNDBarbosa IV, Ladewig VM, Almeida-Pedrin RR, Cardoso MA, Santiago Junior JF, Conti ACCF. The association between patient's compliance and age with the bonding failure of orthodontic brackets: a cross-sectional study. Prog Orthod. 2018 May 1;19(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s40510-018-0209-1.
PMID: 29713922BACKGROUNDJahanbin A, Hasanzadeh N, Khaki S, Shafaee H. Comparison of self-ligating Damon3 and conventional MBT brackets regarding alignment efficiency and pain experience: A randomized clinical trial. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2019 Fall;13(4):281-288. doi: 10.15171/joddd.2019.043.
PMID: 32190212BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jehan F. IBrahim
University of Baghdad
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hadeel A. Al-lami, Asst Prof.
University of Baghdad
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, Orthodontics Department, University of Baghdad
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 21, 2025
First Posted
September 22, 2025
Study Start
April 1, 2025
Primary Completion
October 25, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
September 24, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
No Plan to Share IPD because this trial is a prospective study and yet we can't promise for any sharing