NCT07184346

Brief Summary

The current study aims to evaluate the accuracy of different techniques used to record the centric relation. The sample size was determined based on a previous study by Revilla-León et al. (2023), which indicated that 18 participants per group would provide sufficient power for statistical analysis. Eligible participants will be adults above 18 years of age with good oral health who are fully or partially dentate. Exclusion criteria include complete edentulism, absence of posterior stops, temporomandibular joint disorders, and limited mouth opening. Centric relation (CR) will be recorded for all participants using three methods. In Group 1 (Conventional), a 2 mm Lucia jig fabricated from pattern resin (Dura-lay) will be positioned intraorally with the participant reclined at 45°. Polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) bite registration material will be injected bilaterally from the canines to first molars and allowed to set. Alginate impressions, facebow records, and subsequent mounting on a semi-adjustable articulator will be performed, and the casts will be digitized with a laboratory scanner. In Group 2 (Intraoral Scanner), the iTero Element scanner (Align Technology, San Jose, CA) will be used to capture maxillary and mandibular arches. The same Lucia jig will be placed intraorally, and the bite will be digitally captured using the PVS record. In Group 3 (Optical Jaw Tracking), the Modjaw system will be used with previously acquired iTero scans. The Lucia jig will again standardize mandibular position during CR registration. All recordings will be performed by a single experienced prosthodontist to ensure consistency. For accuracy assessment, STL files from all recordings will be imported into Geomagic Control X (3D Systems). Six digital markers will be placed on maxillary and mandibular reference scans at standardized anatomical landmarks (buccal surfaces of first molars, canines, and central incisors). Thirty-six baseline inter-landmark distances will be calculated. Each experimental scan will then be aligned to the reference scan using a best-fit alignment protocol, with marker coordinates transferred from the reference scan to maintain consistency and avoid manual errors. Inter-landmark distances will be recalculated for each experimental scan. Accuracy will be assessed in terms of trueness (mean absolute deviation between reference and experimental measurements) and precision (consistency of distances within each group). Data will be statistically analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA), with significance set at p \< 0.05.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
1mo left

Started Sep 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress91%
Sep 2025Jun 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 3, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 19, 2025

Completed
11 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 30, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2026

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

September 19, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

May 3, 2025

Last Update Submit

September 14, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Accuracy of Centric Relation Recording (Trueness and Precision in millimeters)

    Accuracy will be assessed by evaluating trueness and precision of centric relation (CR) records obtained with three techniques: conventional, intraoral scanner, and ModJaw optical jaw tracker. Trueness will be calculated as the mean absolute deviation (mm) between inter-landmark distances on reference STL scans and experimental scans using Geomagic Control X software. Precision will be measured as the standard deviation of repeated inter-landmark distances within each group. Data will be reported as mean ± SD values

    Baseline (Day 5, immediately after centric relation recording).

Study Arms (3)

Accuracy of Centric Relation Record (Control)

EXPERIMENTAL

Centric relation will be recorded using a conventional method with a 2 mm Kois deprogrammer and polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) bite registration. Alginate impressions and facebow records will be taken, mounted on a semi-adjustable articulator, and digitized with a laboratory scanner.

Other: Control

Accuracy of Centric Relation record IOS

EXPERIMENTAL

Centric relation will be recorded using an intraoral scanner. Maxillary and mandibular arches will be scanned, and the Kois deprogrammer with PVS registration will be used to digitally capture mandibular position

Device: Intra Oral Scanner

Accuracy of Centric Relation record ModJaw

EXPERIMENTAL

Centric relation will be recorded using the ModJaw optical jaw tracking system (4D jaw tracker). Previously acquired scans will be imported into ModJaw, and the kois deprogrammer will standardize mandibular position during registration

Device: Mod Jaw

Interventions

ControlOTHER

Control Group

Accuracy of Centric Relation Record (Control)

Experimental group 1

Accuracy of Centric Relation record IOS
Mod JawDEVICE

4 D Jaw Tracker

Accuracy of Centric Relation record ModJaw

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults above the age of eighteen years
  • Presenting with good oral health
  • Fully or partially dentate

You may not qualify if:

  • Fully edentulous
  • Partially dentate with lack of posterior stops
  • Temporomandibular Joint Disorders (TMD)
  • Limited mouth opening

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (3)

  • Ries JM, Grunler C, Wichmann M, Matta RE. Three-dimensional analysis of the accuracy of conventional and completely digital interocclusal registration methods. J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Nov;128(5):994-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

    PMID: 33888327BACKGROUND
  • Revilla-Leon M, Subramanian SG, Ozcan M, Krishnamurthy VR. Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner. J Prosthodont. 2020 Feb;29(2):107-113. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13135. Epub 2019 Dec 30.

    PMID: 31860144BACKGROUND
  • Renne W, Ludlow M, Fryml J, Schurch Z, Mennito A, Kessler R, Lauer A. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. J Prosthet Dent. 2017 Jul;118(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.09.024. Epub 2016 Dec 23.

    PMID: 28024822BACKGROUND

Related Links

Central Study Contacts

Haitham Elbishari, BDS PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2025

First Posted

September 19, 2025

Study Start

September 30, 2025

Primary Completion

March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Last Updated

September 19, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share