NCT07182188

Brief Summary

This study aims to conduct a post-market, multicenter clinical trial utilizing an interventional robotic system for cerebral angiography. By comparing it with traditional angiography procedures, the study will systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted angiography in real clinical settings. Researchers will compare the ordinary angiography to assess the clinical success rate, operation time, radiation absorption, complication rate, etc.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
660

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
7mo left

Started Sep 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress79%
Sep 2024Apr 2027

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 11, 2025

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 19, 2025

Completed
1.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2027

Last Updated

September 4, 2026

Status Verified

September 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.7 years

First QC Date

September 11, 2025

Last Update Submit

September 1, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Angiography Success Rate

    Assessment of the success rate of the surgeon in completing cerebral angiography examination through the operation of vascular interventional robotic system or manual way.

    At the end of surgery

  • Complication Rate

    Potential complications include: ① Directly related to the interventional procedure: Vascular injury (vessel rupture, perforation, spasm, gas embolism, and thrombosis); ② Neurological complications: New-onset neurological deficits (transient/permanent), new-onset cerebral ischemia, or new-onset intracerebral hemorrhage, confirmed by postoperative imaging; ③ Systemic complications: Cardiac events, gastrointestinal bleeding, renal dysfunction, etc.

    At the day after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Operation Time

    At the end of surgery

  • Super-selective Success Rate

    At the end of surgery

  • Super-selective Catheterization Time for Vessels

    At the end of surgery

  • Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) Fluoroscopy Time

    At the end of surgery

  • Primary Operator Radiation Absorbed Dose

    At the end of surgery

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Traditional Manual Endovascular Angiography

NO INTERVENTION

Vascular Interventional Robotic System Assisted Angiography

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: Vascular Interventional Robotic System

Interventions

The cerebral angiography will be performed by using the vascular interventional robotic system

Vascular Interventional Robotic System Assisted Angiography

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age between 18 and 75 years;
  • Suspected vascular lesions in the head and neck, or other conditions involving head and neck vessels requiring whole-brain angiography for definitive diagnosis or to aid treatment decisions. Including but not limited to: intracranial aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations, cavernous malformations, arteriovenous fistulas, Moyamoya disease, Moyamoya syndrome, subarachnoid hemorrhage, symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis/occlusion, stenosis/occlusion of the carotid/subclavian/vertebral arteries, acute/ chronic subdural hematoma, etc;
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I-III (no severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction);
  • Patients who voluntarily participate in this study and sign an informed consent form.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who are to undergo surgery at the same time as cerebral angiography;
  • Renal dysfunction (serum creatinine \> 133 μmol/L or estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 60 mL/min/1.73 m²);
  • Patients with known allergy to iodinated contrast media;
  • Coagulation disorders (prothrombin time \>16s, activated partial thromboplastin time \>45s, or platelet count \<100×10⁹/L);
  • Severe infection, skin ulceration, or vascular anatomical abnormalities at the puncture site (e.g., bilateral femoral artery occlusion);
  • Pregnant or lactating women;
  • Patients with severe cognitive impairment;
  • Patients with psychiatric disorders;
  • Patients unable to undergo head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), e.g., those with metallic implants, claustrophobia, or other contraindications;
  • Patients with other severe advanced or terminal illnesses;
  • Patients currently participating in other clinical trials.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100070, China

Location

Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730, China

Location

Related Publications (3)

  • Liu H, Li C, Ren S, Li T, Zhong H, Jia J, Yang H, Qi Y, Feng J, Li Y, Wang Y. Efficacy and safety of a neurointerventional operation robotic assistance system in cerebral angiography. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2024 Jun 21;9(3):243-251. doi: 10.1136/svn-2022-002260.

  • Zhang Y, Xu H, Sun J, Chen WH, Zhang Y, Chen M, Yi T, Wu YM, Cheng G, Guo J, Yang P, Guo S, Liu J. Safety and efficacy of cerebral robot assisted angiography: randomized comparison of robotic versus manual procedures. J Neurointerv Surg. 2026 Apr 16;18(5):1330-1336. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2025-023412.

  • Beaman C, Gautam A, Peterson C, Kaneko N, Ponce L, Saber H, Khatibi K, Morales J, Kimball D, Lipovac JR, Narsinh KH, Baker A, Caton MT, Smith ER, Nour M, Szeder V, Jahan R, Colby GP, Cord BJ, Cooke DL, Tateshima S, Duckwiler G, Waldau B; Robotics Working Group; Robotic Working Group. Robotic Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography: A Multicenter Experience of 113 Patients. J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Jun 17;16(7):726-730. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020448.

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Director of the Department of Neurosurgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2025

First Posted

September 19, 2025

Study Start

September 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2027

Last Updated

September 4, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The vascular interventional robotic system includes proprietary technical features that are integral to the IPD. Publicly sharing IPD would inadvertently disclose proprietary information, which could compromise the manufacturer's intellectual property rights and hinder future development of the technology for broader clinical use.

Locations