A Clinical Trial of Vascular Interventional Robotic System for Cerebral Angiography
Post-Market Application Study and Efficacy/Safety Evaluation of a Vascular Interventional Robotic System for Cerebral Angiography: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
660
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study aims to conduct a post-market, multicenter clinical trial utilizing an interventional robotic system for cerebral angiography. By comparing it with traditional angiography procedures, the study will systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted angiography in real clinical settings. Researchers will compare the ordinary angiography to assess the clinical success rate, operation time, radiation absorption, complication rate, etc.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 11, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 19, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 30, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2027
September 4, 2026
September 1, 2026
2.7 years
September 11, 2025
September 1, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Angiography Success Rate
Assessment of the success rate of the surgeon in completing cerebral angiography examination through the operation of vascular interventional robotic system or manual way.
At the end of surgery
Complication Rate
Potential complications include: ① Directly related to the interventional procedure: Vascular injury (vessel rupture, perforation, spasm, gas embolism, and thrombosis); ② Neurological complications: New-onset neurological deficits (transient/permanent), new-onset cerebral ischemia, or new-onset intracerebral hemorrhage, confirmed by postoperative imaging; ③ Systemic complications: Cardiac events, gastrointestinal bleeding, renal dysfunction, etc.
At the day after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Operation Time
At the end of surgery
Super-selective Success Rate
At the end of surgery
Super-selective Catheterization Time for Vessels
At the end of surgery
Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) Fluoroscopy Time
At the end of surgery
Primary Operator Radiation Absorbed Dose
At the end of surgery
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Traditional Manual Endovascular Angiography
NO INTERVENTIONVascular Interventional Robotic System Assisted Angiography
EXPERIMENTALInterventions
The cerebral angiography will be performed by using the vascular interventional robotic system
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 and 75 years;
- Suspected vascular lesions in the head and neck, or other conditions involving head and neck vessels requiring whole-brain angiography for definitive diagnosis or to aid treatment decisions. Including but not limited to: intracranial aneurysms, arteriovenous malformations, cavernous malformations, arteriovenous fistulas, Moyamoya disease, Moyamoya syndrome, subarachnoid hemorrhage, symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis/occlusion, stenosis/occlusion of the carotid/subclavian/vertebral arteries, acute/ chronic subdural hematoma, etc;
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification I-III (no severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction);
- Patients who voluntarily participate in this study and sign an informed consent form.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who are to undergo surgery at the same time as cerebral angiography;
- Renal dysfunction (serum creatinine \> 133 μmol/L or estimated glomerular filtration rate \< 60 mL/min/1.73 m²);
- Patients with known allergy to iodinated contrast media;
- Coagulation disorders (prothrombin time \>16s, activated partial thromboplastin time \>45s, or platelet count \<100×10⁹/L);
- Severe infection, skin ulceration, or vascular anatomical abnormalities at the puncture site (e.g., bilateral femoral artery occlusion);
- Pregnant or lactating women;
- Patients with severe cognitive impairment;
- Patients with psychiatric disorders;
- Patients unable to undergo head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), e.g., those with metallic implants, claustrophobia, or other contraindications;
- Patients with other severe advanced or terminal illnesses;
- Patients currently participating in other clinical trials.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Peking Union Medical College Hospitallead
- Beijing Tiantan Hospitalcollaborator
- The First Hospital of Hebei Medical Universitycollaborator
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou Universitycollaborator
- Tangshan Worker's Hospitalcollaborator
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical Universitycollaborator
- The First People's Hospital of Lianyungangcollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100070, China
Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College & Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100730, China
Related Publications (3)
Liu H, Li C, Ren S, Li T, Zhong H, Jia J, Yang H, Qi Y, Feng J, Li Y, Wang Y. Efficacy and safety of a neurointerventional operation robotic assistance system in cerebral angiography. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2024 Jun 21;9(3):243-251. doi: 10.1136/svn-2022-002260.
PMID: 37612055RESULTZhang Y, Xu H, Sun J, Chen WH, Zhang Y, Chen M, Yi T, Wu YM, Cheng G, Guo J, Yang P, Guo S, Liu J. Safety and efficacy of cerebral robot assisted angiography: randomized comparison of robotic versus manual procedures. J Neurointerv Surg. 2026 Apr 16;18(5):1330-1336. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2025-023412.
PMID: 40633938RESULTBeaman C, Gautam A, Peterson C, Kaneko N, Ponce L, Saber H, Khatibi K, Morales J, Kimball D, Lipovac JR, Narsinh KH, Baker A, Caton MT, Smith ER, Nour M, Szeder V, Jahan R, Colby GP, Cord BJ, Cooke DL, Tateshima S, Duckwiler G, Waldau B; Robotics Working Group; Robotic Working Group. Robotic Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography: A Multicenter Experience of 113 Patients. J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Jun 17;16(7):726-730. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020448.
PMID: 37468266RESULT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director of the Department of Neurosurgery
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 11, 2025
First Posted
September 19, 2025
Study Start
September 1, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 30, 2027
Last Updated
September 4, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The vascular interventional robotic system includes proprietary technical features that are integral to the IPD. Publicly sharing IPD would inadvertently disclose proprietary information, which could compromise the manufacturer's intellectual property rights and hinder future development of the technology for broader clinical use.