A Comparison Of Dental Arch Analysis Using 3d Digital Scanning Versus Conventional Methods In Children
Arch analysis
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A crossover study will be conducted on 20 pediatric patients aged 7-11 years. For each participant, the upper and lower study models will be processed using two methods: the conventional method, which involves alginate impressions, and the digital method, which utilizes a 3D intraoral digital scanner (CEREC Omnicam scanner or equivalent). Measurements of arch length, arch width, and arch depth will be taken from both model types using the conventional method with a brass wire and a digital caliper. At the same time, in the scan cast, they will be calculated digitally by 3D shape software. Statistical analysis will be done to compare the results of both methods.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 17, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 15, 2025
CompletedSeptember 17, 2025
September 1, 2025
2 months
September 1, 2025
September 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Subjective outcome
Patient acceptance will be recorded according to Modified Facial scale modified from the Maunuksela et al scale showing the 3 schematic faces representing: (A) satisfaction; (B) indifference; and (C) dissatisfaction, respectively.
2 months
Objective Outcome (Measurement)
arch width (inter canine and intermolar width) measured in mm
2 months
Patient acceptance
Frankl's behavior rating scale will be re-evaluated after each method used. Score 1-4. score 1=definitely positive, score 2=positive,score 3=negative,score 4=definitely negative.
2 months
Objective Outcome (Measurement)
Arch Length measured in mm
2 months
Objective Outcome (Measurement)
Arch depth measured in mm
2 months
Study Arms (2)
Conventional Measurement
EXPERIMENTALUsing brass wire and digital caliper
Digital Measurement
EXPERIMENTALIntraoral scanning using CEREC Omnicam scanner and digital models will be obtained
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Healthy Children aged 7-11 years old (ASA 1).
- Class I with normal development of occlusion .
- Absence of dental extractions.
- Absence of previous removable or fixed orthodontic treatments.
- Patients with fully erupted permanent first molars.
- Children with Frankel behavioral rating scale 2,3 and 4.
You may not qualify if:
- Delayed erupted 1st permanent molar.
- Teeth with severe rotation.
- Dental agenesis.
- Oligodontia.
- Frankel behavioral rating scale 1.
- Patients with special health care and medically compromised patients.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pharos University in Alexandria
Alexandria, Egypt
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- statistician
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer of Pediatric Dentistry department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 1, 2025
First Posted
September 17, 2025
Study Start
September 1, 2025
Primary Completion
November 1, 2025
Study Completion
November 15, 2025
Last Updated
September 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09