NCT07178535

Brief Summary

Unilateral motor deficits, such as paresis and tone disorders, are frequent consequences of stroke and lead to gait impairments. Among these, spatial asymmetry is characterized by differences in step length between the paretic and non-paretic limbs, resulting in balance problems and an increased risk of falls. Conventional rehabilitation has shown limited effectiveness in addressing this issue, highlighting the need for innovative approaches. Real-time feedback interventions, particularly through augmented reality (AR), may help improve gait asymmetry by providing a more natural and interactive learning environment. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of two types of real-time visual feedback, an avatar-based system and visual bars, in improving gait symmetry and other locomotor parameters in individuals post-stroke. It will also assess the acceptability and usability of the intervention, participants' sense of presence, and the potential for cybersickness induced by these systems. A repeated-measures design will be used to evaluate the immediate effectiveness of the two types of visual feedback on gait asymmetry and other locomotor parameters in adults in the subacute phase after stroke. Participants, aged 18 to 65 and presenting spatial asymmetry, will perform walking trials in an AR environment while being exposed to both feedback modalities in randomized order. Spatiotemporal and kinematic data will be collected using inertial sensors, while questionnaires will assess acceptability, usability, sense of presence, and cybersickness. Participants will be evaluated in a 45-m long corridor (free of traffic) and will perform nine walking trials (three per condition) under three randomized conditions: (1) a lateral view avatar displayed on the paretic side, previously shown to provide optimal feedback on step length; (2) a visual bar feedback representing bilateral step lengths; and (3) a "control" condition with no additional feedback. Each walking trial, lasting 2.5 minutes, will consist of a pre-adaptation phase without feedback (30 s), followed by an adaptation phase with feedback (1 min), and a post-adaptation phase without feedback (1 min). The investigators expect that avatar-based feedback will be more effective than visual bars in improving spatial symmetry. The investigators also anticipate that both feedback modalities will be well accepted and usable by participants without inducing cybersickness, but that the sense of presence will be higher with avatar-based feedback. This study will shed light on locomotor adjustment mechanisms and may lay the groundwork for future clinical trials. By offering a personalized, evidence-based approach, these results could help transform post-stroke rehabilitation through the integration of innovative tools to optimize functional recovery.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable stroke

Timeline
16mo left

Started Apr 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress7%
Apr 2026Sep 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 3, 2025

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 17, 2025

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 15, 2026

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 15, 2026

Expected
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 15, 2027

Last Updated

February 19, 2026

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

September 3, 2025

Last Update Submit

February 18, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Post-stroke locomotor deficitsSpatial gait asymmetryReal-time visual feedbackAugmented reality

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Step length ratio

    For the ratio calculation, the mean step length values from the left and right sides will be used, with the larger value placed in the numerator to ensure that all individual ratios are \>1.0. A ratio of 1.0 will indicate perfect symmetry. We will compare the step length ratio (SLR)

    For each condition the step length ratio will be assessed at each trial: before the pre-adaptation phase (T1: 0 s), after the pre-adaptation phase (T2: 0.5 min), after the adaptation phase (T3: 1.5 min), and after the post-adaptation phase (T4: 2.5 min).

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Walking speed

    For each condition : before the pre-adaptation phase (T1: 0 s), after the pre-adaptation phase (T2: 0.5 min), after the adaptation phase (T3: 1.5 min), and after the post-adaptation phase (T4: 2.5 min).

  • Step width

    For each condition : before the pre-adaptation phase (T1: 0 s), after the pre-adaptation phase (T2: 0.5 min), after the adaptation phase (T3: 1.5 min), and after the post-adaptation phase (T4: 2.5 min).

  • Gait cycle duration percentages

    For each condition : before the pre-adaptation phase (T1: 0 s), after the pre-adaptation phase (T2: 0.5 min), after the adaptation phase (T3: 1.5 min), and after the post-adaptation phase (T4: 2.5 min).

  • Trunk and pelvis maximum range of motion

    For each condition : before the pre-adaptation phase (T1: 0 s), after the pre-adaptation phase (T2: 0.5 min), after the adaptation phase (T3: 1.5 min), and after the post-adaptation phase (T4: 2.5 min).

  • Hip and knee range of motion

    For each condition : before the pre-adaptation phase (T1: 0 s), after the pre-adaptation phase (T2: 0.5 min), after the adaptation phase (T3: 1.5 min), and after the post-adaptation phase (T4: 2.5 min).

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Participant

EXPERIMENTAL
Device: Feasibility of Two Types of Real-Time Visual Feedback in an Augmented Reality

Interventions

Participants will walk in a corridor (45 m), equipped with "Xsens" inertial sensors recording their kinematics and an "HTC Vive Elite-XR" AR headset superimposing virtual feedback onto the real world. Three real-time feedback conditions (3 trials/condition) will be evaluated randomly: (1) an avatar reflecting the participant's movements; (2) visual bars indicating step lengths; (3) control condition without feedback. Participants take part in an evaluation/intervention session.

Participant

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • All participants must be in the subacute phase, between 14 days and 6 months following a first supratentorial stroke
  • able to walk with or without an assistive device for at least 2.5 minutes
  • present spatial asymmetry (step length ratio, SLR \> 1.08)

You may not qualify if:

  • Abnormal or no-corrected visual acuity (EDTRS \< 50/20)
  • visual field deficits (Goldmann or computerized perimetry)
  • cognitive impairment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment score \< 22
  • not being able to provide informed consent
  • present other conditions besides stroke that limit walking.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital - CISSS Laval

Laval, Quebec, H7V 1R2, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Stroke

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cerebrovascular DisordersBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesVascular DiseasesCardiovascular Diseases

Central Study Contacts

Anouk Lamontagne, Associate Professor

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 3, 2025

First Posted

September 17, 2025

Study Start

April 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 15, 2027

Last Updated

February 19, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-09

Locations