A Study of the Impact of Penicillin Allergy on Antimicrobial Resistance and ouTcomes
IMPAART
1 other identifier
observational
214
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Penicillin allergy is one of the commonest reported allergies. The presence of a penicillin allergy record in a patients notes leads to the avoidance of recommended first-line penicillin antibiotics and the use of alternative non-penicillin antibiotics which can be less effective, have more side effects and have a greater propensity to drive antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Most patients with penicillin allergy records do not have a true allergy when they are tested by a specialist, so many patients are denied the best antibiotics because of an incorrect penicillin allergy record. The study will investigate how having a penicillin allergy impacts on treatment for patients who need antibiotics when they are hospitalised with COVID-19 and how penicillin allergy affects AMR. Antibiotic use is the main driver of AMR, antibiotic use can also disrupt the bacteria that normally live in our guts and mouths. These bacterial communities also known as the gastrointestinal (GI) and oral microbiome respectively, help us digest food and prevent infections. Antibiotic use can 'kill off' these harmless bacteria and lead to an increase in bacteria which have genes that make them resistant to antibiotics (antibiotic resistance genes). The study investigators believe that patients with penicillin allergy are likely to have a greater number of antibiotic resistance genes in their oral and GI microbiomes, ans that this will make it more likely that they will fail antibiotic treatment and will increase their risk of transmitting resistance to others. The study objectives are:
- 1.To determine how penicillin allergy impacts on clinical outcomes in patients admitted with COVID-19
- 2.To find out if AMR genes in the oral microbiome of people with a penicillin allergy record are different to those without a penicillin allergy record
- 3.To investigate whether AMR genes are lost in patients who have an incorrect penicillin allergy label removed
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Nov 2021
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 30, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 24, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 22, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 17, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedSeptember 17, 2025
September 1, 2025
2.4 years
July 22, 2025
September 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Workstream 1: 60 day mortality in patients with and without penicillin allergy
This outcome will measure mortality within 60 days of positive COVID-19 test. Comparative analysis will be conducted between patients with and without a documented penicillin allergy.
60 days from the date of positive COVID 19 test
Workstream 2: The prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in the mouth of patients with and without a penicillin allergy record.
The prevalence of ARGs will be assessed using shotgun metagenomic sequencing of saliva samples. Comparative analysis will be conducted between patients with and without a documented penicillin allergy.
At enrolment
Workstream 3: Change in abundance of antibiotic resistance genes in saliva samples collected from participants enrolled in the ALABAMA trial
This outcome will determine the change in antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) abundance over time in patients who received the ALABAMA trial intervention (penicillin allergy assessment) compared to those in the control group (no penicillin allergy assessment). This analysis will focus on the subset of ALABAMA trial patients with at least one antibiotic prescription prior to their second saliva sampling. Comparative analysis will be conducted between the penicillin allergy assessment group and the no penicillin allergy assessment group.
At enrolment (first sample collection) and 6 to 12 months post-enrolment (second sample collection)
Secondary Outcomes (13)
Workstream 1: Length of hospital stay in patients with and without a penicillin allergy.
Time of hospital admission to discharge or inpatient death for each patient, assessed up to 600 days
Workstream 1: Number of AMR bacterial infections in patients with and without a penicillin allergy.
Time of hospital admission to discharge or inpatient death for each patient, assessed up to 600 days
Workstream 1: Total antibiotic usage in patients with and without a penicillin allergy.
Time of hospital admission to discharge or inpatient death for each patient, assessed up to 600 days
Workstream 1: Rates of treatment failure in patients with and without a penicillin allergy.
Time of hospital admission to discharge or inpatient death for each patient, assessed up to 600 days
Workstream 1: ICU admission rates in patients with and without a penicillin allergy.
Time of hospital admission to discharge or inpatient death for each patient, assessed up to 600 days
- +8 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (5)
Workstream 3: To determine the number of patients from the ALABAMA trial who consented to participate in this sub-study.
From the start of recruitment until the end of the recruitment period, estimated to last up to 5 years
Workstream 3: To determine the number of patients who provide baseline samples
At enrolment
Workstream 3: To determine the number of patients who provide a second sample
Six to twelve months post-enrolment
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (5)
Workstream 1: PEACH Study participants
Adults and adolescents 16 years old and older, admitted to hospital between 1/2/20 and 30/06/20 with a positive SARS-CoV-2 test.
Workstream 2 exposure group
Adult patients with a penicillin allergy attending immunology clinics at Leeds Teaching Hospitals, UK
Workstream 2 comparator group
Adult patients without a penicillin allergy attending immunology clinics at Leeds Teaching Hospitals, UK
Workstream 3 exposure group
Participants enrolled in the ALABAMA trial who underwent penicillin allergy testing
Workstream 3 comparator group
Participants enrolled in the ALABAMA trial who had usual care only (i.e. did not undergo penicillin allergy testing)
Eligibility Criteria
\- Workstream 1 population: Participants included in the Procalcitonin Evaluation of Antibiotic use in COVID-19 Hospitalised patients (PEACH) study (ISRCTN66682918) \- Workstream 2 population: Participants will be recruited from patients attending outpatient clinics at Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom. \- Workstream 3 population: Participants will be recruited from the population of patients participating in the he Allergy Antibiotics and Microbial Resistance (ALABAMA) trial (NCT04108637).
You may qualify if:
- Workstream 1
- Adult (\>16 years) with confirmed COVID-19 (positive PCR test)
- Admitted to participating NHS Trusts/hospitals between 01/02/2020 to 30/06/2020
- Workstream 2
- Adult (≥18 years) patients with a penicillin allergy or a matched patients (by age and sex) without a penicillin allergy
- Received antibiotics in the 24 months prior to recruitment
- Willing to provide saliva +/- stool samples
- Workstream 3
- Patients enrolled into the ALABAMA trial
You may not qualify if:
- Workstream 1
- a. Patients with their allergy status missing will be excluded.
- Workstream 2
- Patients unable to give informed consent or who are unwilling/unable to provide saliva samples
- Unwilling/unable to provide saliva samples
- Workstream 3
- Patients unable to give informed consent or who are unwilling/unable to provide saliva samples
- Unwilling/unable to provide saliva samples
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS trust
Leeds, United Kingdom
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shadia Ahmed, MBChB
Univeristy of Leeds
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Clinical Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 22, 2025
First Posted
September 17, 2025
Study Start
November 30, 2021
Primary Completion
April 24, 2024
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
September 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09