NCT07177313

Brief Summary

Ureteroscopy (URS) is a widely used minimally invasive procedure for the management of ureteral and renal stones (1). While the procedure is generally safe and effective, patient factors such as renal function, operative time, and ASA classification may influence outcomes (2). Ureteral stones were found to be associated with deteriorated kidney function in affected patients (3). In cases of elevated urea and creatinine levels, pre-stenting of ureteroscopy was indicated (4). Limited number of studies have directly assessed the primary ureteroscopy without preoperative stenting outcomes in patients with normal versus deteriorated renal function. Understanding the impact of renal function on URS outcomes can help. A single procedure translates to reduced patient burden through fewer hospital visits, less time spent in the operating room, and a quicker return to daily activities, thus improving comfort and convenience. This approach also yields cost savings by eliminating the expenses associated with a second procedure, including hospital stays, anesthesia, and surgical supplies. Moreover, immediate stone removal via primary URS offers faster symptom relief and avoids potential stent-related complications such as pain, infection, and migration. However, the decision to forego staging must be carefully weighed against individual patient risk factors and stone complexity, as those with severe obstruction, infection, or compromised renal function may still benefit from pre-stenting to optimize procedural safety and outcomes. This study aims to evaluate whether elevated creatinine levels influence stone-free rates, complication rates, and procedural success in patients undergoing primary URS.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
7mo left

Started Oct 2025

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress51%
Oct 2025Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 10, 2025

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 16, 2025

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2026

Expected
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

September 24, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

September 10, 2025

Last Update Submit

September 19, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • post operative complications

    3 month

Study Arms (2)

Group 1

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients presenting with acute obstructive uropathy and uremic renal impairment (defined as serum creatinine ≥1.3 mg/dL)

Procedure: Ureteroscopy

Group2

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients with normal renal function (eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73m²) undergoing primary URS for ureteral stones.

Procedure: Ureteroscopy

Interventions

UreteroscopyPROCEDURE

patients presenting with acute ureteral obstruction who undergo primary ureteroscopy (URS).

Group 1Group2

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults (\>18 years) with acute unilateral ureteral obstruction confirmed by:
  • Non-contrast CT (stone size ≥5mm)
  • Hydronephrosis on ultrasound
  • Planned for primary URS (no prior stenting/nephrostomy)
  • Renal function eligibility:
  • Acute deterioration (elevated serum Cr and urea) serum creatinine ≥1.3 mg/dL but less than 5 mg/dL

You may not qualify if:

  • Systemic contraindications to URS:
  • Uncorrected coagulopathy (INR \>1.5)
  • Active UTI/sepsis (requiring drainage-first approach)
  • Severe cardiopulmonary compromise (ASA class ≥IV)
  • Patients with hypercalcemia.
  • hyperkalemia \>6.5 mEq/L
  • Metabolic acidosis (pH \<7.1)
  • Patients with pulmonary edema.
  • Patients with uremic encephalopathy.
  • Bilateral obstruction
  • Known ureteral stricture distal to stone

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Ureteroscopy

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

EndoscopyDiagnostic Techniques, SurgicalDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisDiagnostic Techniques, UrologicalMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeUrologic Surgical ProceduresUrogenital Surgical Procedures

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Residant doctor at Assiut university hospital

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 10, 2025

First Posted

September 16, 2025

Study Start

October 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

September 24, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09