Impact of a Single Versus Multiple Visits on the Cervical Cancer Screening Completeness, Feasibility and Acceptability Among Women Living With HIV in Cameroon
OptiTri_GC
Optimizing Cervical Cancer Screening Strategies With HPV Testing Among Women Living With HIV in Cameroon: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Impact of a Single-visit Test and Treat Approach in a Hospital Center With an HPV Testing Platform
Other study identifiers
Sponsor study identifier
Secondary identifiers
OTHER_GRANT · Initiative
OTHER_GRANT · ANRS-MIE
interventional
1,422
1 country
1
Study Start
December 12, 2024
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
April 2026
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
May 2027
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
Brief Summary
Context. Cervical cancer (CC) is a leading cause of death among women living with HIV (WLHIV) in resource-limited settings. Yet, effective methods for screening and preventing CC are available. The recommanded approach for CC screening is based on multiple steps, including initial test to detect human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, visual inspection to identify women with HPV at risk for precancerous lesion and treatment when required. Dropout may occur at these different steps, compromising the success of the CC elimination strategy. Performing the all screening and treatment sequence in a single visit has been recommanded based on the results of a large South African trial. Yet, in many contexts, including those with limited resources, the screening and treatment activities are performed in multiple visites for logistical reasons, resulting in many dropouts. Strategies based on the differentiated prestation approaches, which propose a simplified management centered on the patients preferences, could guide the adaptation of the single-visit approach to account for contextual constraints while maintaining high effectiveness. The OptiTri-GC study aims to design and assess the impact of a differentiated CC screen and treat strategy in a district hospital; It will assess both its implementation and its effectiveness based on the completeness at each stage of the screening cascade. In addition, it will also include three sub-studies designed to evaluate :
- The performance of urinary HPV testing.
- The performance of different methods to identify women requiring a treatment.
- The risk of post-treatment cervical disease. This study has two periods. During the first period, a single visit approach will be used while differentiated approach will be prepared using participatory research. During the second period, the differentiated approach will be implemented. The screening overall completeness will be compared between the two periods to assess the differentiated approach effectiveness. The study will also assess the implementation of each screening strategy in terms of :
- Success through the measure of fidelity, reach and completeness
- Identification of adaptation, barriers and facilitating/leverage factors
- Perception, feasibility and acceptability of the screening strategies (by patients and health care workers) It will assess the participants' stress levels during the screening process and to identify potential psychosocial support strategies and document the experience of WLHIV and health workers during the screening process and the post-treatment follow-up. Other study objectives include :
- To assess the performance of different methods to identify women requiring a treatment
- To assess the performance of HPV testing on a urine sample compared with vaginal self-collected or cervical (clinician-collected) samples
- To assess the efficacy of treatment in terms of post-treatment cervical lesions Methodology. Participants will be WLHIV aged 25 to 49 and eligible for CC screening. Health care workers will also be invited to participate to the implementation research. The data collected will be quantitative and qualitative.
Registry Overview
Registry-reported information. Elapsed time and enrollment totals alone do not measure study progress or recruitment pace.
- Recruitment status
- recruiting
- Estimated enrollment
- 1,422 participants
- Study completion date
May 2027
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
- Listed locations
- 1 countries · 1 sites
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Some registry-reported names shown below are not yet linked in this graph.
Study Timeline
Dates and qualifiers reported by the registry. Estimated dates do not confirm that a milestone has occurred.
Study Start
December 12, 2024
Actual (reported)First Submitted
August 22, 2025
Actual (reported)First Posted
September 16, 2025
Actual (reported)Primary Completion
April 2026
Estimated (date passed)This estimate has passed. The registry has not confirmed an actual date for this milestone.
Study Completion
May 2027
EstimatedPlanned date reported by the registry; this milestone is not confirmed as achieved.
- Last Updated
- September 16, 2025
- Status Verified
- September 2025
- Last Update Submitted
- September 12, 2025