NCT07174297

Brief Summary

The goal of this study is to "To compare the efficacy and safety of Acotiamide versus Itopride in patient with post prandial distress syndrome type of functional dyspepsia"

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
152

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3

Timeline
12mo left

Started Oct 2025

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress35%
Oct 2025Apr 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 12, 2025

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 15, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 30, 2025

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2026

Expected
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2027

Last Updated

September 23, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

September 12, 2025

Last Update Submit

September 18, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Difference in overall treatment effect between both groups by using Leuven Postprandial Distress Scale in 8 weeks

    Overall treatment effect will be assessed using the Leeds Postprandial Distress Scale, with change in total score from baseline before initiation of treatment end of treatment. The decreased score representing the treatment response.

    8 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Difference between both groups in symptoms of Postprandial Distress Syndrome (PDS) (including early satiety, abdominal bloating, postprandial fullness) by using Leuven Postprandial Distress Scale

    8 weeks

  • Difference between both groups in quality of life by using short form Nepean Dyspepsia Index scale

    8 weeks

  • Frequency of adverse events, serious adverse events and tolerability in both groups

    8 weeks

Study Arms (2)

assignment of participants to treatment group A (Acotiamide)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Acotiamide

assignment of participants to treatment group B (Itopride).

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Drug: Acotiamide

Interventions

Both these drugs are used for the management of PDS type of FD

Also known as: Itopride
assignment of participants to treatment group A (Acotiamide)assignment of participants to treatment group B (Itopride).

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects to provide written informed consent prior to any study procedures being performed
  • Subjects with age 18-70 both male and female
  • Diagnosed with FD (PDS) by using ROME IV criteria
  • Subjects naive to acotiamide and Itopride for last 2 weeks
  • Subjects must have a normal endoscopy result within the 6 months

You may not qualify if:

  • Without predominant symptoms of ulcer and GERD based on history \& endoscopy, IBS based on history \& Rome IV criteria and Chronic idiopathic nausea based on history only
  • Subjects taking drugs that affect gut motility, gut sensitivity, SSRI and/or acid secretion who are unable to discontinue these drugs before initiating the intervention
  • Subjects with chronic medical disorders potentially contributing to PDS such as chronic pancreatitis, hypothyroidism, CKD and CLD identified through clinical history, physical examination, or previous medical records
  • Subjects with Type I or Type II diabetes
  • Pregnant \& lactating mothers

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Z 338itopride

Study Officials

  • Prof. Dr. Muahmmad Umar, MBBS, FCPS, FACG, AGAF, FRCP

    Rawalpindi Medical University/College

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Mahaveer MR Maheshwari, MBBS

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Model Details: Open-label, comparative randomized, parallel, two-arms, multi-center study. A permuted block randomization technique was applied to generate an individual list of random assignment of participants to treatment group A (Acotiamide) and treatment group B (Itopride). A block represents a separate center/site of enrollment, and each center will enroll total 50 - 55 participants as per protocol. There will be total 3 recruitment centers, and each recruiting center will follow the provided list of random assignments (Annexure). An online software (https://www.sealedenvelope.com/simple-randomiser/v1/lists) was used to generate a random sequence for total 152 subjects with balanced distribution method.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2025

First Posted

September 15, 2025

Study Start

October 30, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2027

Last Updated

September 23, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09