NCT07171853

Brief Summary

With global warming intensifying, GI endoscopy is among the top three greenhouse gas-emitting medical procedures. Colonoscopy, a cornerstone for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, significantly contributes to the carbon footprint (CF). This study quantifies CO₂ emissions in different steps of colonoscopy and evaluates the environmental impact of common polypectomy techniques to establish baseline CF data and identify opportunities for mitigation. This study included patients undergoing colonoscopy for CRC screening. CO₂ emissions were comprehensively measured at each step of the procedure (pre-, during, and post-colonoscopy), including energy consumption, all equipment and medications, waste management, and endoscopy reprocessing. Emission data were also collected for common polypectomy techniques, including cold forceps biopsy (CFB), cold snare polypectomy (CSP), hot snare polypectomy (HSP), and hot snare endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), all performed according to standard polypectomy protocols.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
150

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2025

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 6, 2025

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 15, 2025

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 18, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

September 6, 2025

Last Update Submit

September 13, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Carbon footprintColonoscopyColonic polypectomy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Carbon footprint of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening and various techniques of colonic polypectomy

    To calculate carbon footprint from colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening and various techniques of colonic polypectomy

    4 months after start this study

Study Arms (2)

Diagnostic Colonoscopy

Patient receiving diagnostic colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening without therapeutic intervention

Colonoscopy with colonic polypectomy

Patient receiving colonoscopy with various techniques of colonic polypectomy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients aged 18-80 years who received a colonoscopy at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged 18-80 years

You may not qualify if:

  • Patient status grade III-V according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA)
  • Poor bowel preparation (grade \<6 in the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale \[BBPS\])
  • Endoscopic JNET type III or suspicion of malignancy
  • Hematologic or coagulation disorders, Plt\<140,000/mcL, INR\>1.5
  • anti-platelet/anticoagulant medication that could not be paused as recommended in the current guideline
  • Emergency colonoscopy, GI bleeding, unstable vital sign, critical ill patient
  • Inflammatory bowel disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Severe cardiopulmonary disease
  • Severe infection
  • Malignancy
  • History of allergy to IV sedative medication

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital

Bangkok, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand

RECRUITING

Related Publications (22)

  • Steubing B, de Koning A, Merciai S, Tukker A. How do carbon footprints from LCA and EEIOA databases compare? A comparison of ecoinvent and EXIOBASE. Journal of Industrial Ecology. 2022;26(4):1406-22.

    BACKGROUND
  • Turner DA, Williams ID, Kemp S. Greenhouse gas emission factors for recycling of source-segregated waste materials. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2015;105:186-97.

    BACKGROUND
  • McGinnis S, Johnson-Privitera C, Nunziato JD, Wohlford S. Environmental Life Cycle Assessment in Medical Practice: A User's Guide. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2021 Jul;76(7):417-428. doi: 10.1097/OGX.0000000000000906.

    PMID: 34324694BACKGROUND
  • Sevigne-Itoiz E, Mwabonje O, Panoutsou C, Woods J. Life cycle assessment (LCA): informing the development of a sustainable circular bioeconomy? Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2021 Sep 20;379(2206):20200352. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2020.0352. Epub 2021 Aug 2.

    PMID: 34334023BACKGROUND
  • Yu X, Tan C. China's process-related greenhouse gas emission dataset 1990-2020. Sci Data. 2023 Jan 25;10(1):55. doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-01957-y.

    PMID: 36697420BACKGROUND
  • Rodriguez de Santiago E, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Pohl H, Agrawal D, Arvanitakis M, Baddeley R, Bak E, Bhandari P, Bretthauer M, Burga P, Donnelly L, Eickhoff A, Hayee B, Kaminski MF, Karlovic K, Lorenzo-Zuniga V, Pellise M, Pioche M, Siau K, Siersema PD, Stableforth W, Tham TC, Triantafyllou K, Tringali A, Veitch A, Voiosu AM, Webster GJ, Vienne A, Beilenhoff U, Bisschops R, Hassan C, Gralnek IM, Messmann H. Reducing the environmental footprint of gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Nurses and Associates (ESGENA) Position Statement. Endoscopy. 2022 Aug;54(8):797-826. doi: 10.1055/a-1859-3726. Epub 2022 Jul 8.

    PMID: 35803275BACKGROUND
  • Vaccari M, Tudor T, Perteghella A. Costs associated with the management of waste from healthcare facilities: An analysis at national and site level. Waste Manag Res. 2018 Jan;36(1):39-47. doi: 10.1177/0734242X17739968. Epub 2017 Nov 14.

    PMID: 29132259BACKGROUND
  • Ferlitsch M, Hassan C, Bisschops R, Bhandari P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Risio M, Paspatis GA, Moss A, Libanio D, Lorenzo-Zuniga V, Voiosu AM, Rutter MD, Pellise M, Moons LMG, Probst A, Awadie H, Amato A, Takeuchi Y, Repici A, Rahmi G, Koecklin HU, Albeniz E, Rockenbauer LM, Waldmann E, Messmann H, Triantafyllou K, Jover R, Gralnek IM, Dekker E, Bourke MJ. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2024. Endoscopy. 2024 Jul;56(7):516-545. doi: 10.1055/a-2304-3219. Epub 2024 Apr 26.

    PMID: 38670139BACKGROUND
  • Iwatate M, Sano Y, Tanaka S, Kudo SE, Saito S, Matsuda T, Wada Y, Fujii T, Ikematsu H, Uraoka T, Kobayashi N, Nakamura H, Hotta K, Horimatsu T, Sakamoto N, Fu KI, Tsuruta O, Kawano H, Kashida H, Takeuchi Y, Machida H, Kusaka T, Yoshida N, Hirata I, Terai T, Yamano HO, Nakajima T, Sakamoto T, Yamaguchi Y, Tamai N, Nakano N, Hayashi N, Oka S, Ishikawa H, Murakami Y, Yoshida S, Saito Y; Japan NBI Expert Team (JNET). Validation study for development of the Japan NBI Expert Team classification of colorectal lesions. Dig Endosc. 2018 Sep;30(5):642-651. doi: 10.1111/den.13065. Epub 2018 Jun 26.

    PMID: 29603399BACKGROUND
  • The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Dec;58(6 Suppl):S3-43. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02159-x. No abstract available.

    PMID: 14652541BACKGROUND
  • ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Early DS, Ben-Menachem T, Decker GA, Evans JA, Fanelli RD, Fisher DA, Fukami N, Hwang JH, Jain R, Jue TL, Khan KM, Malpas PM, Maple JT, Sharaf RS, Dominitz JA, Cash BD. Appropriate use of GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jun;75(6):1127-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.01.011. No abstract available.

    PMID: 22624807BACKGROUND
  • Cunha Neves JA, Rodriguez de Santiago E, Aabakken L. Approaches for greening endoscopy and reducing waste. Gut. 2023 Nov 24;72(12):2204-2206. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330917. No abstract available.

    PMID: 37977580BACKGROUND
  • Brown JJ, Asumeng CK, Greenwald D, Weissman M, Zauber A, Striplin J, Weng O, List JM, Farley SM, Winawer SJ. Decreased colorectal cancer incidence and mortality in a diverse urban population with increased colonoscopy screening. BMC Public Health. 2021 Jun 30;21(1):1280. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11330-6.

    PMID: 34193094BACKGROUND
  • Doubeni CA, Corley DA, Quinn VP, Jensen CD, Zauber AG, Goodman M, Johnson JR, Mehta SJ, Becerra TA, Zhao WK, Schottinger J, Doria-Rose VP, Levin TR, Weiss NS, Fletcher RH. Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in reducing the risk of death from right and left colon cancer: a large community-based study. Gut. 2018 Feb;67(2):291-298. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-312712. Epub 2016 Oct 12.

    PMID: 27733426BACKGROUND
  • Han J, Tan Z, Chen M, Zhao L, Yang L, Chen S. Carbon Footprint Research Based on Input-Output Model-A Global Scientometric Visualization Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 9;19(18):11343. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811343.

    PMID: 36141618BACKGROUND
  • Maurice JB, Rochford A, Marshall S, Sebastian S, Dhar A, Hayee B; Green Endoscopy group. Green endoscopy: using quality improvement to develop sustainable practice. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun 7;13(4):342-345. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2021-101874. eCollection 2022. No abstract available.

    PMID: 35722605BACKGROUND
  • Park SB, Cha JM. Gastrointestinal endoscopy's carbon footprint. Clin Endosc. 2023 May;56(3):263-267. doi: 10.5946/ce.2023.003. Epub 2023 Mar 31.

    PMID: 36997185BACKGROUND
  • Lacroute J, Marcantoni J, Petitot S, Weber J, Levy P, Dirrenberger B, Tchoumak I, Baron M, Gibert S, Marguerite S, Huppertz J, Gronier O, Derlon A. The carbon footprint of ambulatory gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2023 Oct;55(10):918-926. doi: 10.1055/a-2088-4062. Epub 2023 May 8.

    PMID: 37156511BACKGROUND
  • Purohit A, Smith J, Hibble A. Does telemedicine reduce the carbon footprint of healthcare? A systematic review. Future Healthc J. 2021 Mar;8(1):e85-e91. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2020-0080.

    PMID: 33791483BACKGROUND
  • Zandalinas SI, Fritschi FB, Mittler R. Global Warming, Climate Change, and Environmental Pollution: Recipe for a Multifactorial Stress Combination Disaster. Trends Plant Sci. 2021 Jun;26(6):588-599. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.02.011. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

    PMID: 33745784BACKGROUND
  • https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/climate-change-and-health.

    BACKGROUND
  • Information NNCfE. Monthly global climate report for annual 2022. NOAA Washington, DC; 2023.

    BACKGROUND

Central Study Contacts

Phubaet Washrawirul, Medical

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assoc. Prof. Dr.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2025

First Posted

September 15, 2025

Study Start

June 1, 2025

Primary Completion

September 30, 2025

Study Completion

October 31, 2025

Last Updated

September 18, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Locations