Sub-threshold DRG Stimulation vs Sham in Established Responders
DRG-SHAM
Efficacy of Sub-Threshold Dorsal Root Ganglion (DRG) Stimulation Versus Sham in Established Responders: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Two-Period Crossover Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if sub-threshold dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation provides pain relief beyond placebo in adults with chronic neuropathic pain who already have an implanted DRG stimulator. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does sub-threshold DRG stimulation reduce daily pain intensity compared with sham stimulation?
- How does sub-threshold stimulation affect sleep, mood, and daily activity? Researchers will compare active sub-threshold DRG stimulation to sham (device switched off) to see if stimulation has a genuine effect on pain and wellbeing. Participants will:
- Be randomly assigned to receive either active sub-threshold DRG stimulation or sham stimulation for 5 days, followed by the opposite condition for another 5 days.
- Complete short electronic diaries twice daily about their pain, sleep, mood, and activity.
- Attend study visits for safety checks and assessments.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 26, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 12, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 30, 2025
CompletedDecember 5, 2025
August 1, 2025
3 months
August 26, 2025
December 4, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Average daily pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale, 0-10)
Self-reported pain intensity recorded twice daily (morning and evening) using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst pain imaginable). Daily scores will be averaged across each treatment and washout period.
Twice daily (morning and evening) from Day 0 through Day 11 (includes both 5-day treatment periods and the two 24-hour washout periods on Day 0 and Day 6).
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Sleep quality (Patient Global Impression of Change, PGIC)
Daily in the morning from Day 0 through Day 11.
Mood (Patient Global Impression of Change, PGIC)
Daily in the evening from Day 0 through Day 11.
Daily activity (Patient Global Impression of Change, PGIC)
Daily in the evening from Day 0 through Day 11.
Adverse events
From day 0 through end of study (day 11).
Study Arms (2)
Subtreshhold DRG-S
ACTIVE COMPARATORActive Sub-threshold DRG Stimulation Participants receive sub-threshold dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation. Device amplitude is individually titrated to 80% of the perception threshold, ensuring no paresthesia is felt. Frequency and pulse width remain unchanged from each participant's established clinical settings. Stimulation is delivered continuously for 5 days.
Sham
SHAM COMPARATORSham Stimulation Participants receive sham stimulation. The implanted DRG stimulator is switched off, with device interrogation logs masked to maintain blinding. The sham condition lasts for 5 days.
Interventions
Continuous electrical stimulation delivered through an implanted DRG neurostimulator. Amplitude is set individually to 80% of each participant's perception threshold, ensuring no paresthesia is produced. Frequency and pulse width remain unchanged from the participant's established therapeutic settings. This sub-threshold programming distinguishes the intervention from suprathreshold (paresthesia-based) DRG stimulation used in earlier studies.
The implanted DRG stimulator remains switched off for the entire 5-day period. Device interrogation logs are masked to maintain blinding. No electrical stimulation is delivered, allowing a placebo-controlled comparison with active sub-threshold stimulation.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults, age 18 years or older
- Implanted with a dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulator for chronic neuropathic pain
- Have experienced at least 50% reduction in pain for 3 months or longer on standard DRG therapy
- Stable pain medication regimen for at least 4 weeks before enrollment
- Able and willing to complete electronic diaries and attend study visits
You may not qualify if:
- Active infection or wound complication at the stimulator implant site
- Significant psychiatric illness (for example, uncontrolled depression or psychosis)
- Planned surgery, device reprogramming, or medication changes during the study period
- Currently pregnant or breastfeeding
- Occurrence of any adverse event that meets predefined withdrawal criteria during the study (such as intolerable pain or device-related complications)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Umeå Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Neurokirurgiska kliniken. Neuromodulationsenheten
Umeå, Västerbotten County, 90185, Sweden
Related Publications (5)
Huygen FJPM, Kallewaard JW, Nijhuis H, Liem L, Vesper J, Fahey ME, Blomme B, Morgalla MH, Deer TR, Capobianco RA. Effectiveness and Safety of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: A Pooled Analysis. Neuromodulation. 2020 Feb;23(2):213-221. doi: 10.1111/ner.13074. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
PMID: 31730273BACKGROUNDD'Souza RS, Kubrova E, Her YF, Barman RA, Smith BJ, Alvarez GM, West TE, Abd-Elsayed A. Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Lower Extremity Neuropathic Pain Syndromes: An Evidence-Based Literature Review. Adv Ther. 2022 Oct;39(10):4440-4473. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02244-9. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
PMID: 35994195BACKGROUNDDeer TR, Levy RM, Kramer J, Poree L, Amirdelfan K, Grigsby E, Staats P, Burton AW, Burgher AH, Obray J, Scowcroft J, Golovac S, Kapural L, Paicius R, Kim C, Pope J, Yearwood T, Samuel S, McRoberts WP, Cassim H, Netherton M, Miller N, Schaufele M, Tavel E, Davis T, Davis K, Johnson L, Mekhail N. Dorsal root ganglion stimulation yielded higher treatment success rate for complex regional pain syndrome and causalgia at 3 and 12 months: a randomized comparative trial. Pain. 2017 Apr;158(4):669-681. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000814.
PMID: 28030470BACKGROUNDChapman KB, Sayed D, Lamer T, Hunter C, Weisbein J, Patel KV, Dickerson D, Hagedorn JM, Lee DW, Amirdelfan K, Deer T, Chakravarthy K. Best Practices for Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for Chronic Pain: Guidelines from the American Society of Pain and Neuroscience. J Pain Res. 2023 Mar 14;16:839-879. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S364370. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 36942306BACKGROUNDPiedade GS, Gillner S, McPhillips PS, Vesper J, Slotty PJ. Effect of low-frequency dorsal root ganglion stimulation in the treatment of chronic pain. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Apr;165(4):947-952. doi: 10.1007/s00701-023-05500-1. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
PMID: 36705762BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pedram Tabatabaei Tabatabaei, M.D, Ph.D
Univeristy hospital of northern sweden
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2025
First Posted
September 12, 2025
Study Start
September 1, 2025
Primary Completion
November 30, 2025
Study Completion
November 30, 2025
Last Updated
December 5, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- 12 months after publication, with no end date.
- Access Criteria
- De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the published results, along with the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and analytic code, will be made available. Access will be provided to qualified researchers affiliated with academic institutions, healthcare organizations, or non-profit entities. Requests must include a research proposal and be approved by the study investigators. Access will be granted under a data use agreement that ensures compliance with GDPR and institutional policies. Data will be hosted in an open-access repository (OSF) 12 months after publication of the primary results.
De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the published results will be made available. This will include outcome data reported in the manuscript. Data will be available beginning 12 months after publication, with no end date. Access will be granted to qualified researchers upon reasonable request, subject to approval of a proposal and completion of a data use agreement. Data and statistical code will also be deposited in an open repository (OSF)