Foam and Liquid Sclerotherapy With or Without Herbal Gel for Small Vein Treatment
ELF-HTR
Effectiveness of Liquid Versus Foam Sclerotherapy With or Without Herbal Gel in Treating Telangiectasia and Reticular Veins: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
508
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Telangiectasias (spider veins) and reticular veins represent early and common manifestations of chronic venous insufficiency . Telangiectasias are dilated intradermal venules or capillaries less than 1 mm in diameter and typically appear on the thighs, calves, or ankles in a red, pink, or purple hue. Reticular veins, measuring 1-3 mm, are dilated subdermal veins located slightly deeper and often function as feeder veins to telangiectasias. They are commonly blue or green and may cause discomfort or cosmetic concerns. According to the CEAP classification (Clinical-Etiology-Anatomy-Pathophysiology), telangiectasias and reticular veins fall under class C1. Chronic venous insufficiency of the lower extremities is increasingly prevalent, affecting nearly one-third of women and one-fifth of men, and can lead to symptoms such as leg fatigue, cramps, swelling, skin changes, or in advanced cases, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism. Telangiectasias are often the first visible signs of CVI and are frequently treated for cosmetic purposes. Sclerotherapy is a well-established treatment for C1 venous disease. It involves the injection of a sclerosant agent into abnormal veins, causing endothelial damage, inflammation, and eventual fibrosis and closure of the vein. Among the most commonly used sclerosants are detergent-type agents like sodium tetradecyl sulfate (STS) and polidocanol (POL), which have been used effectively in both liquid and foam forms. Liquid sclerotherapy has been employed for over 160 years, offering a minimally invasive approach to treat superficial veins. Foam sclerotherapy, introduced by Orbach and further popularized in recent decades, involves mixing the sclerosant with air or gas to form a microbubble foam. This form has increased surface area contact with the endothelium, potentially enhancing efficacy, particularly in larger veins. However, debate remains regarding the relative safety and effectiveness of foam versus liquid sclerotherapy, especially for small vessels such as telangiectasias and reticular veins. Several clinical studies, including those by Kaygin and Halici, have compared foam and liquid sclerotherapy in treating lower limb varicose veins. Both forms have demonstrated efficacy and acceptable safety profiles. Nonetheless, further research is needed to determine the optimal form of sclerotherapy, especially in relation to cosmetic outcomes, pain, patient satisfaction, and side effect profiles. This study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of liquid versus foam sclerotherapy, with or without herbal application in the treatment of telangiectasias and reticular veins.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 5, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 5, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 9, 2025
CompletedSeptember 9, 2025
August 1, 2025
11 months
August 25, 2025
August 31, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Appearance of Telangiectasia and Reticular Veins Assessed by the Physician and Patient Global Assessment Scale
Improvement from baseline in appearance of telangiectasia and reticular veins, assessed using a 5-point Global Assessment Scale (0 = no improvement, 4 = complete resolution). Both physician and patient will provide independent scores.
4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants with Treatment-Related Adverse Events
4 weeks after treatment
Study Arms (4)
liquid sclerotherapy injection without application of herbal gel after procedure
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will receive liquid polidocanol injection sclerotherapy without herbal gel application
liquid sclerotherapy injection with application of herbal gel after procedure
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will receive liquid polidocanol injection sclerotherapy, followed by the application of a herbal gel topically at the injection site. The gel is applied immediately post-procedure twice daily
foam sclerotherapy injection without application of herbal gel after procedure
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will receive foam polidocanol injection sclerotherapy without application of herbal gel
foam sclerotherapy injection with application of herbal gel after procedure
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this group will receive foam polidocanol injection sclerotherapy, followed by the application of a herbal gel topically at the injection site. The gel is applied immediately post-procedure twice daily
Interventions
Liquid sclerotherapy injection of polidocanol in telangectasia and reticular veins without application of herbal gel post procedure
Liquid sclerotherapy injection of polidocanol in telangectasia and reticular veins with application of herbal gel post procedure
foam sclerotherapy injection of polidocanol in telangectasia and reticular veins without application of herbal gel post procedure
foam sclerotherapy injection of polidocanol in telangectasia and reticular veins with application of herbal gel post procedure
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- telangiectasis on thigh or leg side
- Competent saphenofemoral and saphenopoliteal junction
- Patient post surgical stripping or post thermal ablation
- clinical classification of chronic venous disease C1(mild venous disease), -
- minimum age of 18 year-old and maximum age 65 year-old -
You may not qualify if:
- varicose disease in any quantity or location with clinical classification of chronic venous
- disease different of C1(mild venous disease)
- arterial insufficiency
- patient allergic to the sclerosant material or herbal gel
- dermatitis on application site
- patient with serious comorbidities like heart failure, respiratory failure, - uncontrolled hypertension with medication, and uncontrolled hypothyroidism - pregnancy - previous deep vein thrombosis (DVT) - family history of DVT - thrombophilia
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of medicine kfs university
Kafr ash Shaykh, Kafr el-Sheikh Governorate, 33511, Egypt
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
moustafa hassan mabrouk, lecturer
faculty of medicine kfs university
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Due to the visible and physical differences between foam and liquid polidocanol, as well as the use of adjunctive herbal gel in some arms, masking of participants and investigators was not feasible. Therefore, the study is conducted as an open-label trial with no blinding
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- director
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 25, 2025
First Posted
September 9, 2025
Study Start
September 5, 2024
Primary Completion
August 5, 2025
Study Completion
September 1, 2025
Last Updated
September 9, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share