Fast Track to Fertility
FTFRCT
1 other identifier
interventional
160
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The Fast Track to Fertility (FTF) program is an algorithmic text messaging communication and patient education platform designed to improve the efficiency the fertility workup. The initial pilot program resulted in an approximately 50% reduction in the time taken to complete the diagnostic workup. Since the pilot program, the investigators have enhanced the FTF Program (v2.0) beyond the texting platform, incorporating educational videos to increase patient knowledge and autonomy in the workup and treatment of infertility. This protocol pertains to a randomized controlled quality improvement initiative to measure the impact of the FTF v2.0 Program on fertility workup completion, efficiency, and patient outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 25, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 4, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 22, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 25, 2027
ExpectedJanuary 23, 2026
January 1, 2026
6 months
June 30, 2025
January 21, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Infertility workup completion
Number of subjects that completed all components of their personalized work-up with 60 days of the new patient visit
60 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Days taken to complete the infertility workup
One year following participant recruitment
Days between new patient and return visit
One year following participant recruitment
Percentage of patients who completed 3, 4, or 5 components of the work-up
One year following participant recruitment
Other Outcomes (5)
Number of patients initiating any fertility treatment
One year following participant recruitment
Number of patients specifically initiating IVF
One year following participant recruitment
Time to initiate fertility treatment
One year following participant recruitment
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Fast Track to Fertility Algorithmic Text Messaging Platform
EXPERIMENTALPatients randomized to the FTF arm will have a personalized algorithm selected on the W2H platform to send text messaging prompts about the next steps and provide educational materials. Patients in this arm will also receive text links to educational videos on the following subjects: * Diagnostic testing * Fertility awareness methods * Menstrual cycle * Optimizing natural fertility * Nutrition * Lifestyle modifications * Supplements * COVID and fertility * Mental health and fertility
Standard of Care
NO INTERVENTIONPatients randomized to the standard of care receive printed and/or electronic information about diagnostic tests and infertility treatments. A link to all video patient educational materials is included in this printed/electronic information. These educational materials will be provided at the first patient visit.
Interventions
The Fast Track to Fertility algorithmic text messaging platform uses branching logic based on our standard workup protocol to text patients to schedule blood tests and an ultrasound timed to their menstrual cycle, as well as remind male partners to schedule blood and semen analyses. The platform will use an algorithmic approach to facilitate two-way communication, and any queries with no available responses will be escalated to the clinical team. Patients are not dependent on structured messages to progress through their journey; they can ask relevant questions in real time, and they are supported with fewer reminders. Response categories include clinical guidance and FAQs (e.g., how to determine cycle start or uterine cavity evaluation pre-appointment instructions), administrative guidance and FAQs (when to schedule test/appointment or clinic locations or phone numbers), and conversational pleasantries.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female new patients seen at Penn Fertility Care for the workup of infertility
- Patients who have yet to complete at least 3 components of the fertility workup, including:
- Laboratory blood tests
- Tubal patency testing / uterine cavity assessment (hysterosalpingogram (HSG) or sonohysterogram (Femvue))
- Pelvic ultrasound
- Semen analysis
- Genetic carrier screening.
- Patients must be willing to be randomized to FTF versus standard of care
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy
- Age \<18 years
- Patients with no access to texting or unable to engage via a text messaging service
- Patients requiring fewer than three components of the infertility work-up
- Patients presenting for second opinion with work-up completed
- Patients seeking IVF for oocyte cryopreservation, PGT-M, or embryo banking
- Non-English speaking
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Pennsylvanialead
- Ferring Pharmaceuticalscollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Penn Fertility Care
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Related Publications (12)
Acker A, Senapati S, Dokras A. Barriers to access: findings from an implementation study of an artificial intelligence-augmented 2-way chatbot for fertility care. Fertil Steril. 2023 Jul;120(1):199-201. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.04.016. Epub 2023 Apr 20. No abstract available.
PMID: 37085095BACKGROUNDHirshberg A, Sammel MD, Srinivas SK. Text message remote monitoring reduced racial disparities in postpartum blood pressure ascertainment. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Sep;221(3):283-285. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 May 20. No abstract available.
PMID: 31121137BACKGROUNDLerma K, Reyes G, Tiwari S, Tewari A, Hastings C, Blumenthal PD. Acceptability of a text message-based fertility awareness application for family planning in Lucknow, India. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018 Jul;142(1):104-107. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12488. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
PMID: 29574716BACKGROUNDSenapati S, Asch DA, Merchant RM, Rosin R, Seltzer E, Mancheno C, et al. The Fast Track to Fertility Program: Rapid Cycle Innovation to Redesign Fertility Care. NEJM Catalyst 2022;3(10):CAT.22.0065.
BACKGROUNDFallahzadeh H, Zareei Mahmood Abadi H, Momayyezi M, Malaki Moghadam H, Keyghobadi N. The comparison of depression and anxiety between fertile and infertile couples: A meta-analysis study. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2019 May 5;17(3):153-62. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v17i3.4514. eCollection 2019 Mar.
PMID: 31435599BACKGROUNDDomar AD. Impact of psychological factors on dropout rates in insured infertility patients. Fertil Steril. 2004 Feb;81(2):271-3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.08.013.
PMID: 14967355BACKGROUNDEisenberg ML, Smith JF, Millstein SG, Nachtigall RD, Adler NE, Pasch LA, Katz PP; Infertility Outcomes Program Project Group. Predictors of not pursuing infertility treatment after an infertility diagnosis: examination of a prospective U.S. cohort. Fertil Steril. 2010 Nov;94(6):2369-71. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.03.068. Epub 2010 May 14.
PMID: 20471010BACKGROUNDBrandes M, van der Steen JO, Bokdam SB, Hamilton CJ, de Bruin JP, Nelen WL, Kremer JA. When and why do subfertile couples discontinue their fertility care? A longitudinal cohort study in a secondary care subfertility population. Hum Reprod. 2009 Dec;24(12):3127-35. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep340. Epub 2009 Sep 26.
PMID: 19783833BACKGROUNDThoma ME, McLain AC, Louis JF, King RB, Trumble AC, Sundaram R, Buck Louis GM. Prevalence of infertility in the United States as estimated by the current duration approach and a traditional constructed approach. Fertil Steril. 2013 Apr;99(5):1324-1331.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.11.037. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
PMID: 23290741BACKGROUNDPractice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org; Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Fertility evaluation of infertile women: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2021 Nov;116(5):1255-1265. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.08.038. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
PMID: 34607703BACKGROUNDPractice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Electronic address: asrm@asrm.org. Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2020 Mar;113(3):533-535. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.025. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
PMID: 32115183BACKGROUNDZegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, de Mouzon J, Ishihara O, Mansour R, Nygren K, Sullivan E, Vanderpoel S; International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology; World Health Organization. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology, 2009. Fertil Steril. 2009 Nov;92(5):1520-4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.009. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
PMID: 19828144BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anuja Dokras, MD, MHCI, PhD
University of Pennsylvania
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 30, 2025
First Posted
September 4, 2025
Study Start
April 25, 2025
Primary Completion
October 22, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
April 25, 2027
Last Updated
January 23, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- The data will be made available beginning 6 months after publication and will be accessible for 2 years.
- Access Criteria
- Data will be shared with qualified researchers upon request and with appropriate data use agreements. Interested researchers must submit a proposal outlining the research question and analysis plan.
The IPD that will be shared includes de-identified individual-level data related to primary and secondary outcome measures and baseline characteristics.