Development and Usability Evaluation of an Arm Circumference Measurement Tool For Patients Undergoing Breast Surgery
1 other identifier
interventional
35
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to develop an arm circumference measurement device that can be used by both patients and nurses in the follow-up of upper extremity lymphedema, which may occur as a result of breast cancer surgery, and to evaluate its usability. This study also seeks to determine whether the developed device can offer a more accurate, faster, and more practical alternative compared to traditional tape measurements. The main questions it aims to answer are: Is there a significant difference in intra-observer reliability between the measurements taken by nurses and patients using the arm circumference measurement device and those taken using a traditional tape measure? Is there a significant difference in inter-observer reliability between the measurements taken by nurses and patients using the arm circumference measurement device and those taken using a traditional tape measure? Is there a significant difference in the measurement results obtained by nurses and patients when using the arm circumference measurement device compared to a traditional tape measure? Do nurses and patients experience a difference in the duration of arm circumference measurements when using the measurement device versus a traditional tape measure? Is there a difference in the satisfaction levels of nurses and patients regarding arm circumference measurements performed with the measurement device versus a traditional tape measure? This study will be conducted in two phases: the first phase involves the development of the arm circumference measurement tool, and the second phase involves the evaluation of its usability through a double-blind, two-group, crossover randomized controlled trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 21, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 4, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 20, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 20, 2025
CompletedSeptember 4, 2025
August 1, 2025
2 months
July 21, 2025
August 26, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Intra-rater Reliability
The consistency of repeated measurements performed by the same individual (nurse, patient, or researcher) using different methods (tape measure and the newly developed arm circumference measurement device). Evaluated separately for the right and left arms. Comparisons will be made between the two measurement methods.
Preoperative period (Same day, within 30 minutes between repeated measurements.) The same rater (nurse/patient/researcher) performs repeated measurements on the same arm with both methods within a short interval to assess consistency.
Inter-rater Reliability
The agreement between different raters (nurse-patient, nurse-researcher, patient-researcher) using the same method (either tape measure or the new measurement device). Evaluated for both arms and both measurement tools. Inter-rater agreement will be assessed across all rater combinations.
Preoperative period (Same day, sequential measurements within 1 hour by different raters.) Measurements by different raters (nurse, patient, researcher) are conducted on the same day in a fixed sequence.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Measurement Duration
Preoperative period (all measurements for both arms; each method's duration recorded separately and immediately)
User Satisfaction - Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Preoperative period (each participant completes both measurement methods; immediately after finishing all measurements for both arms, the participant completes the same-day questionnaire without delay)
User Satisfaction - Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0)
Preoperative period (questionnaire completed immediately after all measurements on both arms using both methods)
Open-ended Feedback (Interview Forms)
Preoperative period (open-ended feedback collected immediately after completing both measurement methods and satisfaction scales during the same session) Türkçe:
Study Arms (4)
İntervention-control group (Patient)
OTHERThe intervention-control group will first perform circumference measurements using the arm circumference measurement device, followed by measurements with the tape measure. The measurement values obtained by the patients will be recorded in the Anthropometric Measurement and Time Tracking Form. The researcher will use a stopwatch to record the duration of the measurements, which will also be documented in the form.
Control-Intervention Group (Patients)
OTHERThe control-intervention group will first perform circumference measurements using the tape measure, followed by measurements with the arm circumference measurement device. The measurement values obtained by the patients will be recorded in the Anthropometric Measurement and Time Tracking Form. The researcher will use a stopwatch to record the duration of the measurements, which will also be documented in the form. At the end of the procedure, all patients will complete the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST), and Patient Interview Form.
Intervention-Control Group (Nurses)
OTHERThe intervention-control group will first perform circumference measurements using the arm circumference measurement device, followed by measurements with the tape measure. Nurses will record their measurement values in the Anthropometric Measurement and Time Tracking Form. The researcher will use a stopwatch to record the duration, which will also be noted in the form.
Control-Intervention Group (Nurses)
OTHERThe control-intervention group will first perform circumference measurements using the tape measure, followed by measurements with the arm circumference measurement device. Nurses will record their measurement values in the Anthropometric Measurement and Time Tracking Form. The researcher will use a stopwatch to record the duration, which will also be noted in the form. At the end of the procedure, all nurses will complete the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST), and Nurse Interview Form.
Interventions
Patients and nurses in this group will measure both arms (at four different anatomical reference points) first using the newly developed arm circumference measurement device, followed by the traditional tape measure.
Patients and nurses in this group will measure both arms (at four different anatomical reference points) first using the traditional tape measure, and then using the newly developed arm circumference measurement device.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Nurses:
- Currently working in General Surgery or Surgical Oncology clinics
- Patients:
- Aged 18 years or older
- Newly diagnosed with breast cancer confirmed by histopathology
- Planned to undergo radical mastectomy, modified radical mastectomy, or breast-conserving surgery
- Scheduled for axillary lymph node dissection (at least two lymph nodes to be dissected)
- Able to understand information related to circumference measurement and perform the required skills
You may not qualify if:
- Patients:
- Patients who have undergone bilateral lymph node dissection
- Patients with a prior diagnosis and treatment for breast cancer (surgery, chemotherapy, etc.)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (24)
Zou L, Liu FH, Shen PP, Hu Y, Liu XQ, Xu YY, Pen QL, Wang B, Zhu YQ, Tian Y. The incidence and risk factors of related lymphedema for breast cancer survivors post-operation: a 2-year follow-up prospective cohort study. Breast Cancer. 2018 May;25(3):309-314. doi: 10.1007/s12282-018-0830-3. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
PMID: 29397555BACKGROUNDYusof KM, Avery-Kiejda KA, Ahmad Suhaimi S, Ahmad Zamri N, Rusli MEF, Mahmud R, Saini SM, Abdul Wahhab Ibraheem S, Abdullah M, Rosli R. Assessment of Potential Risk Factors and Skin Ultrasound Presentation Associated with Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema in Long-Term Breast Cancer Survivors. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jul 21;11(8):1303. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11081303.
PMID: 34441238BACKGROUNDYakut, Y., Yurt, Y., Yağci, G., & Şimşek, İ. E. (2021). Quebec Yardımcı Teknoloji Kullanıcı Memnuniyeti Değerlendirme 2.0 Anketi'nin protez ve ortez kullanan bireylerde Türkçe adaptasyonu. Journal of Exercise Therapy and Rehabilitation, 7(3), 284-295. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jetr/issue/59488/706401
BACKGROUNDTurna, I. F. (2020). Lenfödem Tanı ve Tedavisine Güncel Bakış. Acibadem Universitesi Saglik Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(1), 0-0. https://doi.org/10.31067/0.2020.238
BACKGROUNDTidhar D, Armer JM, Deutscher D, Shyu CR, Azuri J, Madsen R. Measurement Issues in Anthropometric Measures of Limb Volume Change in Persons at Risk for and Living with Lymphedema: A Reliability Study. J Pers Med. 2015 Sep 30;5(4):341-53. doi: 10.3390/jpm5040341.
PMID: 26437431BACKGROUNDTaghian NR, Miller CL, Jammallo LS, O'Toole J, Skolny MN. Lymphedema following breast cancer treatment and impact on quality of life: a review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014 Dec;92(3):227-34. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2014.06.004. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
PMID: 25085806BACKGROUNDSun F, Hall A, Tighe MP, Brunelle CL, Sayegh HE, Gillespie TC, Daniell KM, Taghian AG. Perometry versus simulated circumferential tape measurement for the detection of breast cancer-related lymphedema. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 Nov;172(1):83-91. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4902-z. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
PMID: 30062571BACKGROUNDShi B, Lin Z, Shi X, Guo P, Wang W, Qi X, Zhou C, Zhang H, Liu X, Iv A. Effects of a lymphedema prevention program based on the theory of knowledge-attitude-practice on postoperative breast cancer patients: A randomized clinical trial. Cancer Med. 2023 Jul;12(14):15468-15481. doi: 10.1002/cam4.6171. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
PMID: 37329176BACKGROUNDPappalardo M, Starnoni M, Franceschini G, Baccarani A, De Santis G. Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Recent Updates on Diagnosis, Severity and Available Treatments. J Pers Med. 2021 May 12;11(5):402. doi: 10.3390/jpm11050402.
PMID: 34065795BACKGROUNDOstby PL, Armer JM, Smith K, Stewart BR. Patient Perceptions of Barriers to Self-Management of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema. West J Nurs Res. 2018 Dec;40(12):1800-1817. doi: 10.1177/0193945917744351. Epub 2017 Nov 30.
PMID: 29191123BACKGROUNDOstby PL, Armer JM, Dale PS, Van Loo MJ, Wilbanks CL, Stewart BR. Surveillance recommendations in reducing risk of and optimally managing breast cancer-related lymphedema. J Pers Med. 2014 Aug 18;4(3):424-47. doi: 10.3390/jpm4030424.
PMID: 25563360BACKGROUNDSheikhi-Mobarakeh Z, Yarmohammadi H, Mokhatri-Hesari P, Fahimi S, Montazeri A, Heydarirad G. Herbs as old potential treatments for lymphedema management: A systematic review. Complement Ther Med. 2020 Dec;55:102615. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102615. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
PMID: 33221590BACKGROUNDMcLaughlin SA, Brunelle CL, Taghian A. Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema: Risk Factors, Screening, Management, and the Impact of Locoregional Treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jul 10;38(20):2341-2350. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.02896. Epub 2020 May 22. No abstract available.
PMID: 32442064BACKGROUNDLi MM, Wu PP, Qiang WM, Li JQ, Zhu MY, Yang XL, Wang Y. Development and validation of a risk prediction model for breast cancer-related lymphedema in postoperative patients with breast cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Apr;63:102258. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2022.102258. Epub 2022 Dec 31.
PMID: 36821887BACKGROUNDKayiran O, De La Cruz C, Tane K, Soran A. Lymphedema: From diagnosis to treatment. Turk J Surg. 2017 Jun 1;33(2):51-57. doi: 10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3870. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28740950BACKGROUNDHarrington S, Gilchrist L, Sander A. Breast Cancer EDGE Task Force Outcomes: Clinical Measures of Pain. Rehabil Oncol. 2014;32(1):13-21.
PMID: 25346950BACKGROUNDHameeteman M, Verhulst AC, Vreeken RD, Maal TJ, Ulrich DJ. 3D stereophotogrammetry in upper-extremity lymphedema: An accurate diagnostic method. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016 Feb;69(2):241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.10.011. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
PMID: 26590631BACKGROUNDGandhi A, Xu T, DeSnyder SM, Smith GL, Lin R, Barcenas CH, Stauder MC, Hoffman KE, Strom EA, Ferguson S, Smith BD, Woodward WA, Perkins GH, Mitchell MP, Garner D, Goodman CR, Aldrich M, Travis M, Lilly S, Bedrosian I, Shaitelman SF. Prospective, early longitudinal assessment of lymphedema-related quality of life among patients with locally advanced breast cancer: The foundation for building a patient-centered screening program. Breast. 2023 Apr;68:205-215. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.02.011. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
PMID: 36863241BACKGROUNDFajdic J, Djurovic D, Gotovac N, Hrgovic Z. Criteria and procedures for breast conserving surgery. Acta Inform Med. 2013 Mar;21(1):16-9. doi: 10.5455/AIM.2013.21.16-19.
PMID: 23572855BACKGROUNDDonahue PMC, MacKenzie A, Filipovic A, Koelmeyer L. Advances in the prevention and treatment of breast cancer-related lymphedema. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2023 Jul;200(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s10549-023-06947-7. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
PMID: 37103598BACKGROUNDCau N, Galli M, Cimolin V, Grossi A, Battarin I, Puleo G, Balzarini A, Caraceni A. Quantitative comparison between the laser scanner three-dimensional method and the circumferential method for evaluation of arm volume in patients with lymphedema. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2018 Jan;6(1):96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.08.014.
PMID: 29248110BACKGROUNDBoyages J, Xu Y, Kalfa S, Koelmeyer L, Parkinson B, Mackie H, Viveros H, Gollan P, Taksa L. Financial cost of lymphedema borne by women with breast cancer. Psychooncology. 2017 Jun;26(6):849-855. doi: 10.1002/pon.4239. Epub 2016 Aug 21.
PMID: 27479170BACKGROUNDArmer JM, Hulett JM, Bernas M, Ostby P, Stewart BR, Cormier JN. Best Practice Guidelines in Assessment, Risk Reduction, Management, and Surveillance for Post-Breast Cancer Lymphedema. Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2013 Jun;5(2):134-144. doi: 10.1007/s12609-013-0105-0.
PMID: 26246870BACKGROUNDOzhanli Y, Akyolcu N. Satisfaction of Patients with Triage and Nursing Practice in Emergency Departments. Florence Nightingale J Nurs. 2020 Mar 6;28(1):49-60. doi: 10.5152/FNJN.2020.18041. eCollection 2020 Feb.
PMID: 34263185BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Hatice AYHAN, Professor
SBUniversite
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Both the participants (patients and nurses) and the statistician conducting the data analyses are blinded to the group assignments of the participants
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Assistant
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 21, 2025
First Posted
September 4, 2025
Study Start
July 10, 2025
Primary Completion
September 20, 2025
Study Completion
November 20, 2025
Last Updated
September 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
I do not intend to share individual participant data (IPD).