NCT07154589

Brief Summary

Patients who underwent an abdominal surgery and had the abdomen remain open are called to have an "open abdomen". To limit the risk of further widening of their wounds, surgeons can use AbClo, which is a non-invasive abdominal binding device, to keep the abdominal wall together (i.e., approximate the fascia). However, as the device also compresses on the abdomen and adjacent lungs, this study aims:

  • To assess whether the abdominal binding device causes changes in the pressure compressing the lungs, the lung volume, and the function of the lungs.
  • To assess whether adjusting the breathing machine can mitigate such negative changes. Participants will already be on the abdominal binding device when joining the study. Measurements on various aspects of the lung function (including its physical properties and capability to oxygenate the blood) will be done before and after adjustment of the abdominal binding device to the pressure (measured in the device itself) recommended by the manufacturer, as well as after the surgery to close the abdomen.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
18

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
1mo left

Started Jun 2025

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress93%
Jun 2025Jun 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 10, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 26, 2025

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 4, 2025

Completed
9 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2026

Last Updated

April 22, 2026

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

12 months

First QC Date

August 26, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 16, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

open abdomenmechanical ventilationtranspulmonary pressure

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Changes in End-expiratory Transpulmonary Pressure

    Calculated by the difference between airway pressure and the value measured by an esophageal catheter at the end of expiration. Measurements are made once before the adjustment of the fascial approximation device to the optimal pressure, after the adjustment, and again after the surgery to close the abdomen.

    On the day of enrolment and on the day of surgery to close the abdomen

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Changes in Lung Volume

    On the day of enrolment

  • Changes in oxygenation function

    On the day of enrolment and on the day of surgery to close the abdomen

  • Response in End-expiratory Transpulmonary Pressure to PEEP Increase

    On the day of enrolment

Study Arms (1)

Abdominal fascial approximation device

All patients are already on the device before starting the study

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Adult patients admitted the ICU with open abdomen treated with AbClo device, and undergoing mechanical ventilation

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients aged 18 years or older
  • Patients admitted to an ICU
  • Patients with postoperative abdominal surgery with open abdomen
  • Patients treated with AbClo device
  • Patients intubated and mechanically ventilated
  • Patients treated with intravenous sedation with a sedation-agitation scale score of 1-3

You may not qualify if:

  • Transient criteria: Patients with severe hemodynamic instability, defined systolic blood pressure less than 75 mmHg or mean arterial pressure less than 60 mmHg despite vasopressor use
  • Transient criteria: Patients with severe bleeding diathesis, defined as the latest platelet count less than 20 · 109/L, or the latest INR higher than 2.0
  • Patients with concurrent injuries to upper gastrointestinal tract that would preclude esophageal balloon insertion
  • Patients with bronchopleural fistula
  • Patients with measured and uncontrolled increased intracranial pressure

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

St. Michael's Hospital

Toronto, Ontario, M5B1W8, Canada

RECRUITING

Related Publications (11)

  • Wauters J, Wilmer A, Valenza F. Abdomino-thoracic transmission during ACS: facts and figures. Acta Clin Belg. 2007;62 Suppl 1:200-5.

    PMID: 17469720BACKGROUND
  • Regli A, Pelosi P, Malbrain MLNG. Ventilation in patients with intra-abdominal hypertension: what every critical care physician needs to know. Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Apr 25;9(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0522-y.

    PMID: 31025221BACKGROUND
  • Beitler JR, Sarge T, Banner-Goodspeed VM, Gong MN, Cook D, Novack V, Loring SH, Talmor D; EPVent-2 Study Group. Effect of Titrating Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) With an Esophageal Pressure-Guided Strategy vs an Empirical High PEEP-Fio2 Strategy on Death and Days Free From Mechanical Ventilation Among Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 Mar 5;321(9):846-857. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.0555.

    PMID: 30776290BACKGROUND
  • Yoshida T, Amato MBP, Grieco DL, Chen L, Lima CAS, Roldan R, Morais CCA, Gomes S, Costa ELV, Cardoso PFG, Charbonney E, Richard JM, Brochard L, Kavanagh BP. Esophageal Manometry and Regional Transpulmonary Pressure in Lung Injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr 15;197(8):1018-1026. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201709-1806OC.

    PMID: 29323931BACKGROUND
  • Naveed A, Martin ND, Bawazeer M, Jastaniah A, Rezende-Neto JB. Early placement of a non-invasive, pressure-regulated, fascial reapproximation device improves reduction of the fascial gap in open abdomens: a retrospective cohort study. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2024 Oct 12;9(1):e001529. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2024-001529. eCollection 2024.

    PMID: 39411009BACKGROUND
  • Rezende-Neto JB, Camilotti BG. New non-invasive device to promote primary closure of the fascia and prevent loss of domain in the open abdomen: a pilot study. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2020 Nov 11;5(1):e000523. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2020-000523. eCollection 2020.

    PMID: 33225070BACKGROUND
  • Diaz JJ Jr, Cullinane DC, Dutton WD, Jerome R, Bagdonas R, Bilaniuk JW, Collier BR, Como JJ, Cumming J, Griffen M, Gunter OL, Kirby J, Lottenburg L, Mowery N, Riordan WP Jr, Martin N, Platz J, Stassen N, Winston ES. The management of the open abdomen in trauma and emergency general surgery: part 1-damage control. J Trauma. 2010 Jun;68(6):1425-38. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181da0da5.

    PMID: 20539186BACKGROUND
  • Roberts DJ, Leppaniemi A, Tolonen M, Mentula P, Bjorck M, Kirkpatrick AW, Sugrue M, Pereira BM, Petersson U, Coccolini F, Latifi R. The open abdomen in trauma, acute care, and vascular and endovascular surgery: comprehensive, expert, narrative review. BJS Open. 2023 Sep 5;7(5):zrad084. doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad084.

    PMID: 37882630BACKGROUND
  • Kreis BE, de Mol van Otterloo AJ, Kreis RW. Open abdomen management: a review of its history and a proposed management algorithm. Med Sci Monit. 2013 Jul 3;19:524-33. doi: 10.12659/MSM.883966.

    PMID: 23823991BACKGROUND
  • Kirkpatrick AW, Roberts DJ, De Waele J, Jaeschke R, Malbrain ML, De Keulenaer B, Duchesne J, Bjorck M, Leppaniemi A, Ejike JC, Sugrue M, Cheatham M, Ivatury R, Ball CG, Reintam Blaser A, Regli A, Balogh ZJ, D'Amours S, Debergh D, Kaplan M, Kimball E, Olvera C; Pediatric Guidelines Sub-Committee for the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. Intra-abdominal hypertension and the abdominal compartment syndrome: updated consensus definitions and clinical practice guidelines from the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Jul;39(7):1190-206. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2906-z. Epub 2013 May 15.

    PMID: 23673399BACKGROUND
  • Mahoney EJ, Bugaev N, Appelbaum R, Goldenberg-Sandau A, Baltazar GA, Posluszny J, Dultz L, Kartiko S, Kasotakis G, Como J, Klein E. Management of the open abdomen: A systematic review with meta-analysis and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Sep 1;93(3):e110-e118. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003683. Epub 2022 May 12.

    PMID: 35546420BACKGROUND

Central Study Contacts

Nattapat Wongtirawit, M.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2025

First Posted

September 4, 2025

Study Start

June 10, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Last Updated

April 22, 2026

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study will not be publicly available due participant confidentiality, according to the REB, but will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Locations