NCT07154277

Brief Summary

The goal of this trial is to compare the effectiveness of small bite versus large bite abdominal incision closure in emergency settings. It will also evaluate the safety and outcomes of each technique. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does small bite closure reduce the incidence of superficial surgical site infections (SSI), wound dehiscence, and incisional hernia compared to large bite closure? What are the associated complications of each closure technique? Participants will: Undergo either a small bite or large bite abdominal incision closure during emergency laparotomy Visit the clinic for follow-up assessments at 7 days, 15 days, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-operatively Have their wound healing and complications documented and analyzed during respective visits.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2023

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 23, 2023

Completed
8 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 12, 2024

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 4, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 24, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 24, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 4, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.1 years

First QC Date

July 12, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 26, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

midline abdominal closureemergency laparotomysmall bite closurelarge bite closurewound closure

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Number of participants with Wound Dehiscence

    Wound dehiscence as seen by the surgeon.

    1 month

  • Number of participants with Surgical Site Infections

    As per CDC guidelines and seen by the surgeon

    1 month

Study Arms (2)

Large Bite Closure of midline laparotomy wound

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Standard closure: Suture bite should be 1 cm away from wound margin and 1 cm apart from the previous suture bite

Procedure: Large bite closure

Small Bite Closure of midline laparotomy wound

EXPERIMENTAL

Small Bite closure: Suture bite should be 0.5 cm away from wound margin and 0.5 cm apart from the previous suture bite

Procedure: Small bite closure

Interventions

Small bite suturing is small tissue bite of 0.5cm depth x 0.5cm travel x 0.5cm apart, on the aponeurosis away from midline using Prolene 2/0

Also known as: small bite suturing technique, small bite suture, 0.5*0.5*0.5 suturing technique
Small Bite Closure of midline laparotomy wound

Large bite closure is defined as tissue bite of 1cm depth x 1 cm travel x 1cm apart, on the aponeurosis away from midline using Prolene 0

Also known as: Large bite suturing technique, Large bite suture, Large suturing technique
Large Bite Closure of midline laparotomy wound

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults ages in between 18-60 year old
  • All emergency laparotomies (Except trauma)

You may not qualify if:

  • Previous surgery with midline incision
  • Pregnancy
  • Current immunosuppressive or chemotherapy
  • Previous incisional hernia after midline incision

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi

Karachi, Sindh, 74400, Pakistan

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Surgical Wound DehiscenceIncisional HerniaSurgical Wound Infection

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Postoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsHerniaPathological Conditions, AnatomicalWound InfectionInfections

Study Officials

  • Omer Bin Khalid Jamil

    Ruth K.M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Masking is done only for outcome assessor as it is not possible for others to be masked.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patients are randomly categorized into two different groups and treated differently and outcomes are assessed in the same manner in both groups.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2024

First Posted

September 4, 2025

Study Start

November 23, 2023

Primary Completion

December 24, 2025

Study Completion

December 24, 2025

Last Updated

September 4, 2025

Record last verified: 2024-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations