Small Bites Vs Large Bites Abdominal Midline Incisional Closure
Abdominal Midline Incisional Closure With Small Bites Vs Large Bites in Emergency Settings
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this trial is to compare the effectiveness of small bite versus large bite abdominal incision closure in emergency settings. It will also evaluate the safety and outcomes of each technique. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does small bite closure reduce the incidence of superficial surgical site infections (SSI), wound dehiscence, and incisional hernia compared to large bite closure? What are the associated complications of each closure technique? Participants will: Undergo either a small bite or large bite abdominal incision closure during emergency laparotomy Visit the clinic for follow-up assessments at 7 days, 15 days, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months post-operatively Have their wound healing and complications documented and analyzed during respective visits.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2
Started Nov 2023
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 23, 2023
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 12, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 4, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 24, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 24, 2025
CompletedSeptember 4, 2025
December 1, 2024
2.1 years
July 12, 2024
August 26, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Number of participants with Wound Dehiscence
Wound dehiscence as seen by the surgeon.
1 month
Number of participants with Surgical Site Infections
As per CDC guidelines and seen by the surgeon
1 month
Study Arms (2)
Large Bite Closure of midline laparotomy wound
ACTIVE COMPARATORStandard closure: Suture bite should be 1 cm away from wound margin and 1 cm apart from the previous suture bite
Small Bite Closure of midline laparotomy wound
EXPERIMENTALSmall Bite closure: Suture bite should be 0.5 cm away from wound margin and 0.5 cm apart from the previous suture bite
Interventions
Small bite suturing is small tissue bite of 0.5cm depth x 0.5cm travel x 0.5cm apart, on the aponeurosis away from midline using Prolene 2/0
Large bite closure is defined as tissue bite of 1cm depth x 1 cm travel x 1cm apart, on the aponeurosis away from midline using Prolene 0
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults ages in between 18-60 year old
- All emergency laparotomies (Except trauma)
You may not qualify if:
- Previous surgery with midline incision
- Pregnancy
- Current immunosuppressive or chemotherapy
- Previous incisional hernia after midline incision
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Dr. Ruth K. M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi
Karachi, Sindh, 74400, Pakistan
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Omer Bin Khalid Jamil
Ruth K.M. Pfau Civil Hospital Karachi
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Masking is done only for outcome assessor as it is not possible for others to be masked.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 12, 2024
First Posted
September 4, 2025
Study Start
November 23, 2023
Primary Completion
December 24, 2025
Study Completion
December 24, 2025
Last Updated
September 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2024-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share