Evaluation of the STEP Intervention for Long-Term Care Residents Facing Hospital Transfer Decisions
STEP
A Pre-Post Trial Evaluating the Supporting Transitions and Empowering Preferences (STEP) Decision Support Intervention for Long-Term Care Residents Facing Hospital Transfer Decisions During Acute Health Crises
2 other identifiers
interventional
200
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This trial will evaluate whether the Supporting Transitions and Empowering Preferences (STEP) toolkit can improve decision-making about hospital transfers in long-term care residents and their substitute decision-makers and enhance decision self-efficacy in nursing staff. The trial will answer the questions:
- Does the STEP tool reduce decisional conflict in residents and care partners at the time of transfer decisions?
- Does it improve nurse self-efficacy related to hospital transfer decisions? Participants will:
- Use the STEP tool during key moments of care planning (admission, care conferences, and acute events)
- Complete a short survey measuring their decisional conflict
- Be supported by trained nurses who use STEP to guide hospital transfer discussions Researchers will compare data collected before and after the STEP tool is implemented at two long-term care homes to see if it improves shared decision-making related to hospital transfers by reducing decisional conflict.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 19, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 3, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 4, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2027
ExpectedFebruary 6, 2026
January 1, 2026
5 months
August 19, 2025
February 4, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Decisional Conflict
Measured using the Decisional Conflict Scale (16 items; each rated on a 5-point scale; standardized total score 0-100, with higher scores indicating greater decisional conflict and worse decision-making outcomes).
Administered by Research Assistant 1-6 weeks after a transition decision.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Decision Self-Efficacy
Administered by Research Assistant 1-6 weeks after a transition decision and periodically thereafter.
Transition Rate
Measured continuously during the 6 months pre-intervention and 6 months post-intervention periods.
Resident Health Outcomes Post-Transition
Measured continuously during the 6 months pre-intervention and 6 months post-intervention periods.
Study Arms (1)
STEP Intervention
EXPERIMENTALParticipants (resident-care partner dyads) in this arm will receive the STEP intervention. STEP is a decision aid designed to support shared decision-making about whether to transfer to hospital or remain in LTC during acute health events. It includes an educational booklet, a structured decision aid, and a staff phone script used at three points in the resident's care journey: (1) upon LTC admission, (2) during annual care conferences, and (3) at the time of an acute medical event. LTC nurses will receive training to deliver the STEP tool and support residents and care partners in making informed, values-based transition decisions.
Interventions
The STEP toolkit includes (1) an educational booklet provided upon admission and annually, (2) condition-specific decision aids addressing common clinical scenarios, and (3) structured phone scripts for staff. STEP empowers residents and care partners to actively engage in decision-making, promotes care aligned with personal values, and supports staff in facilitating advance care planning to reduce unnecessary or complex transitions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Residents-care partner dyads:
- Must be residents of either Perley Health or Bruyère Health Saint-Louis LTC home.
- Residents must be 55 years of age or older.
- Must be able to communicate in French or English.
- LTC staff:
- Must be a nurse, nurse practitioner, social service worker or physician actively involved in care planning, annual conferences, or managing acute health events at Perley Health or Bruyère Health.
- Must have been employed at the LTC home for at least 6 months to ensure familiarity with the care environment and residents.
- Must play a role in facilitating discussions, providing clinical input (where applicable), or guiding decision-making processes related to hospital transitions or acute care management.
- Must be able to communicate in French or English.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Bruyère Health Saint-Louis Long-Term Care
Ottawa, Ontario, K1C 2Z6, Canada
Perley Health
Ottawa, Ontario, K1G 4B2, Canada
Related Publications (8)
Tappen RM, Elkins D, Worch S, Weglinski M. Modes of Decision Making Used by Nursing Home Residents and Their Families When Confronted With Potential Hospital Readmission. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2016 Nov 1;9(6):288-299. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20160920-01. Epub 2016 Sep 27.
PMID: 27665753BACKGROUNDMarincowitz C, Preston L, Cantrell A, Tonkins M, Sabir L, Mason S. What influences decisions to transfer older care-home residents to the emergency department? A synthesis of qualitative reviews. Age Ageing. 2022 Nov 2;51(11):afac257. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac257.
PMID: 36413591BACKGROUNDGruneir A, Bronskill SE, Newman A, Bell CM, Gozdyra P, Anderson GM, Rochon PA. Variation in Emergency Department Transfer Rates from Nursing Homes in Ontario, Canada. Healthc Policy. 2016 Nov;12(2):76-88.
PMID: 28032826BACKGROUNDGruneir A, Anderson GM, Rochon PA, Bronskill S. Transitions in long-term care and potential implications for quality reporting in Ontario, Canada. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2010 Nov;11(9):629-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2010.07.007.
PMID: 21029997BACKGROUNDCummings GG, McLane P, Reid RC, Tate K, Cooper SL, Rowe BH, Estabrooks CA, Cummings GE, Abel SL, Lee JS, Robinson CA, Wagg A. Fractured Care: A Window Into Emergency Transitions in Care for LTC Residents With Complex Health Needs. J Aging Health. 2020 Mar;32(3-4):119-133. doi: 10.1177/0898264318808908. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
PMID: 30442040BACKGROUNDAbraham S, Menec V. Transitions Between Care Settings at the End of Life Among Older Homecare Recipients: A Population-Based Study. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2016 Dec 15;2:2333721416684400. doi: 10.1177/2333721416684400. eCollection 2016 Jan-Dec.
PMID: 28680944BACKGROUNDMenard A, Singh Y, Adams M, Bai JQA, Kobewka D, MacLeod KK. "We Didn't Ask to Be Sick:" Equipping Residents and Care Partners for Transitions From Long-Term Care to Hospital. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Aug;73(8):2410-2421. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19535. Epub 2025 May 30.
PMID: 40444661BACKGROUNDMenard A, Konikoff L, Adams M, Singh Y, Scott MM, Yin CY, Kimura M, Kobewka D, Fung C, Isenberg SR, Kaasalainen S, Kierulf J, Molnar F, Shamon S, Wilson K, Kehoe MacLeod K; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and Bruyere Health Research Institute. Supporting resident-centred decision-making about transitions from long-term care homes to hospital: a qualitative study protocol. BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 29;14(11):e086748. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086748.
PMID: 39615892BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 19, 2025
First Posted
September 3, 2025
Study Start
October 1, 2025
Primary Completion
March 4, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Last Updated
February 6, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Given the small sample size, the sensitive nature of data collected in long-term care settings, and the potential risk of participant re-identification, we do not plan to share IPD publicly. However, IPD may be shared on a case-by-case basis in response to reasonable, ethically approved requests. Aggregate results will be disseminated through publications and presentations.