The Diagnostic Value of Subharmonic Imaging Technology Combined With Liver Stiffness and Platelet Count for High-risk Esophageal and Gastric Varices in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis
1 other identifier
interventional
380
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To evaluate the diagnostic value of the combined model of subharmonic-assisted pressure estimation (SHAPE), liver stiffness (LSM), and platelet count (PLT) for high-risk esophageal and gastric varices (HRV)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 26, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 31, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 3, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2028
May 5, 2026
July 1, 2025
2.9 years
August 26, 2025
April 29, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
HV-PV (dB)
The difference in the average harmonic signal between the hepatic vein and the portal vein
Within two weeks of admission
Measurement of liver stiffness(kPa)
The patient lies on their back, with their right hand placed behind their head. The right upper limb is fully abducted to expose the intercostal Spaces in the right lobe of the liver. The area usually enclosed by the horizontal line of the xiphoid process, the midline of the right axilla and the lower edge of the rib is taken as the testing area. The probe is vertically and closely attached to the skin, and the measurement position is selected in the intercostal space.
Within two weeks of admission
blood platelet count(×10⁹/L)
The peripheral blood of the patient was tested by a conventional blood analyzer to obtain the platelet count.
Within two weeks of admission
sensitivity and specificity
The sensitivity measures the ability of the model to correctly identify patients with HRV (i.e., the true positive rate), and the specificity measures the ability of the model to correctly exclude patients without HRV (i.e., the true negative rate).
The one-year period from enrollment to the end of the group
Positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV)
PPV represents the probability that patients identified as high-risk by the model actually have HRV, while NPV represents the probability that patients identified as low-risk by the model do not actually have HRV
The one-year period from enrollment to the end of the group
AUC
Comprehensively reflect the overall discriminative ability of the model under different thresholds
The one-year period from enrollment to the end of the group
Study Arms (1)
SHAPE
EXPERIMENTALUse an ultrasound probe to scan the liver to locate the portal vein and hepatic vein. In the angiography mode, the portal vein and hepatic vein of the same depth were selected for measurement respectively. Ultrasound contrast agent was injected through the elbow vein to observe the changes of sub-harmonic signals in the portal vein and hepatic vein. Collect the sub-harmonic signal data of the portal vein and hepatic vein, and calculate the difference between the two, that is, the SHAPE gradient.
Interventions
Use an ultrasound probe to scan the liver to locate the portal vein and hepatic vein. In the angiography mode, the portal vein and hepatic vein of the same depth were selected for measurement respectively. Ultrasound contrast agent was injected through the elbow vein to observe the changes of sub-harmonic signals in the portal vein and hepatic vein. Collect the sub-harmonic signal data of the portal vein and hepatic vein, and calculate the difference between the two, that is, the SHAPE gradient.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ① Be at least 18 years old② Clinically diagnosed as liver cirrhosis (based on medical history, physical signs, laboratory tests, imaging or liver biopsy)③ Underwent a gastroscopy④ The informed consent form has been signed
You may not qualify if:
- ① Previous EV bleeding or having received TIPS/ endoscopic treatment.② History of concurrent liver cancer, portal vein thrombosis, and splenectomy.③ Having used drugs that affect platelet count, liver function or coagulation function in the body within one week, and having a recent history of blood product infusion.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The First Hospital of Jilin University
Changchun, Jilin, 130021, China
Related Publications (8)
de Franchis R, Bosch J, Garcia-Tsao G, Reiberger T, Ripoll C; Baveno VII Faculty. Baveno VII - Renewing consensus in portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2022 Apr;76(4):959-974. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.12.022. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
PMID: 35120736BACKGROUNDWang H, Wen B, Chang X, Wu Q, Wen W, Zhou F, Guo Y, Ji Y, Gu Y, Lai Q, He Q, Li J, Chen J, Hou J. Baveno VI criteria and spleen stiffness measurement rule out high-risk varices in virally suppressed HBV-related cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2021 Mar;74(3):584-592. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.09.034. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
PMID: 33039403BACKGROUNDDing NS, Nguyen T, Iser DM, Hong T, Flanagan E, Wong A, Luiz L, Tan JY, Fulforth J, Holmes J, Ryan M, Bell SJ, Desmond PV, Roberts SK, Lubel J, Kemp W, Thompson AJ. Liver stiffness plus platelet count can be used to exclude high-risk oesophageal varices. Liver Int. 2016 Feb;36(2):240-5. doi: 10.1111/liv.12916. Epub 2015 Sep 6.
PMID: 26212020BACKGROUNDVorobioff JD, Groszmann RJ. Prevention of portal hypertension: from variceal development to clinical decompensation. Hepatology. 2015 Jan;61(1):375-81. doi: 10.1002/hep.27249. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
PMID: 24913395BACKGROUNDStefanescu H, Marasco G, Cales P, Fraquelli M, Rosselli M, Ganne-Carrie N, de Ledinghen V, Ravaioli F, Colecchia A, Rusu C, Andreone P, Mazzella G, Festi D. A novel spleen-dedicated stiffness measurement by FibroScan(R) improves the screening of high-risk oesophageal varices. Liver Int. 2020 Jan;40(1):175-185. doi: 10.1111/liv.14228. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
PMID: 31444849BACKGROUNDYu S, Chen W, Jiang Z. Platelet count/spleen volume ratio has a good predictive value for esophageal varices in patients with hepatitis B liver cirrhosis. PLoS One. 2021 Dec 2;16(12):e0260774. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260774. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34855845BACKGROUNDDiaz-Soto MP, Garcia-Tsao G. Management of varices and variceal hemorrhage in liver cirrhosis: a recent update. Ther Adv Gastroenterol. 2022 Jun 20;15:17562848221101712. doi: 10.1177/17562848221101712. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 35757384BACKGROUNDLiang H, Si H, Liu M, Yuan L, Ma R, Zhang G, Yang J, Mo Z, Zhao Q. Non-Invasive Prediction Models for Esophageal Varices and Red Signs in Patients With Hepatitis B Virus-Related Liver Cirrhosis. Front Mol Biosci. 2022 Jul 12;9:930762. doi: 10.3389/fmolb.2022.930762. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 35911970BACKGROUND
Related Links
- Related Info
- Liang H, Si H, Liu M, et al. Non-invasive prediction models for esophageal varices and red signs in patients with hepatitis B virus-related liver Cirrhosis\[J\]. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences, 2022, 9: 930762.
- Yu S, Chen W, Jiang Z. Platelet count/spleen volume ratio has a good predictive value for esophageal varices in patients with hepatitis B liver Cirrhosis\[J\]. PLOS One, 2021, 16(12): e0260774.
- Vorobioff J D, Groszmann R J. Prevention of portal hypertension: From variceal development to clinical Decompensation\[J\]. Hepatology, 2015, 61(1): 375~381.
- \] De Franchis R, Bosch J, Garcia-Tsao G, et al. Baveno VII - renewing consensus in portal Hypertension\[J\]. Journal of Hepatology, 2022, 76(4): 959~974.
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- The SHAPE operator and the analyst, the LSM operator, and the gastroscopy operator blinded each other (unaware of each other's results and clinical data), and the SHAPE images were independently analyzed by two ultrasound physicians.
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, PI
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2025
First Posted
September 3, 2025
Study Start
August 31, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2028
Last Updated
May 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share