Peroneal Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Pregnancy for Restless Legs Syndrome
PENS-P
PENS-P: Peroneal Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Pregnancy for Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS)
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The goal of this study is to evaluate whether peroneal electrical nerve stimulation (PNS) using the TOMAC™ device is a feasible, acceptable, and safe non-pharmacologic intervention for managing Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) during pregnancy. This pilot study will also collect preliminary information on symptom relief, sleep quality, and maternal-fetal safety associated with device use. The main questions the study aims to answer are: Is TOMAC™ PNS a feasible and acceptable intervention for RLS in pregnant individuals? Are there any maternal, fetal, or neonatal safety concerns with PNS use during pregnancy? What are the patterns of adherence, tolerance, and usability of the TOMAC™ device in this population? Participants will: Use a non-invasive TOMAC™ peroneal nerve stimulator during 30-minute sessions as needed, for 8 weeks. Complete questionnaires assessing feasibility, acceptability, symptom severity, and sleep quality (including AIM, IAM, FIM, IRLS, PGI-I, PSQI, ESS, FOSQ, and MOS-II). Wear an actigraphy monitor to collect objective sleep data at baseline and at 4 weeks. Attend scheduled follow-up visits and phone check-ins for maternal vital signs, uterine contraction and fetal monitoring, and neonatal outcome assessment. This is a prospective, open-label, single-arm pilot study enrolling 15 pregnant participants between 21 and 26 weeks' gestation. Findings will provide the first dataset on the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of TOMAC™ PNS in pregnancy and inform the design of a future randomized controlled trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2025
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 11, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 27, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 31, 2026
November 12, 2025
October 1, 2025
12 months
August 11, 2025
November 10, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) Score
The Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) is a validated 4-item questionnaire assessing participants' perceptions of how acceptable the intervention is. Scores range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.
Baseline to 8 weeks of intervention
Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) Score
The Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) is a validated 4-item questionnaire assessing participants' perceptions of how appropriate the intervention is for their condition. Scores range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater appropriateness.
Baseline and Week 8 of intervention
Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) Score
The Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) is a validated 4-item questionnaire assessing participants' perceptions of how feasible it is to use the intervention. Scores range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate greater feasibility.
Baseline and Week 8 of intervention
Secondary Outcomes (15)
Adherence to Maximum Allowed Device Sessions
Throughout 8 weeks of intervention
Mean Session Duration
Continuous during 8-week intervention
Mean Stimulation Voltage Used During Device Sessions
Continuous during 8-week intervention
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events (AEs)
Throughout 8-week intervention
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Throughout 8-week intervention
- +10 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
TOMAC™ Peroneal Nerve Stimulation
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive TOMAC™ peroneal nerve stimulation (PNS) therapy for Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) during pregnancy. Following a supervised in-clinic titration session with uterine contraction and fetal monitoring at ≥28 weeks' gestation, participants will use the device at home for 8 weeks. Each therapy session lasts 30 minutes and can be performed as many times as needed daily, prioritizing periods of high symptom burden or before bedtime. Outcomes include feasibility, acceptability, adherence and maternal-fetal safety.
Interventions
The TOMAC™ system is a non-invasive, wearable peroneal nerve stimulator that delivers high-frequency electrical stimulation to the common peroneal nerves at the fibular head. It is FDA-cleared for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) in adults but has not been studied in pregnancy. In this trial, pregnant participants will undergo an in-clinic titration session with uterine contraction and fetal monitoring at ≥28 weeks' gestation to determine comfortable therapeutic intensity. They will then use the device at home for 8 weeks, up to four 30-minute sessions daily, prioritizing periods of high symptom burden or before bedtime. Outcomes will assess feasibility, acceptability, adherence, symptom improvement, sleep quality, and maternal-fetal safety.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18 years
- Pregnant individuals between 21 and 26 weeks' gestation at enrollment
- Singleton pregnancy without known fetal anomalies
- Confirmed clinical diagnosis of Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) according to International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG) criteria, confirmed by a sleep medicine specialist to exclude RLS mimics
- Able and willing to provide informed consent
- Able and willing to comply with study procedures, including device usage, questionnaires, adherence diaries, and follow-up assessments up to 3 months postpartum
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy-related:
- History of preterm labor
- Known fetal anomalies identified prior to enrollment
- Neurological and neuromuscular disorders:
- Pre-existing neuromuscular disorders affecting balance or gait
- Severe peripheral neuropathy involving the lower legs
- Epilepsy or history of seizures
- Cardiovascular and circulatory conditions:
- History of deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
- Circulatory conditions contraindicating peroneal nerve stimulation (PNS) device use
- Dermatological conditions:
- Skin conditions at device application sites
- Known allergy to device materials
- Other sleep disorders:
- Inadequately treated severe primary sleep disorders other than RLS (e.g., untreated severe sleep apnea, severe insomnia unrelated to RLS)
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Rhode Island Hospitallead
- American College of Chest Physicianscollaborator
Study Sites (2)
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, United States
Rhode Island Hospital
Providence, Rhode Island, 02903, United States
Related Publications (30)
Yoshimura C, Arima H, Amagase H, Takewaka M, Nakashima K, Imaoka C, Miyanaga N, Obama H, Fujita M, Ando SI. Idiopathic and secondary restless legs syndrome during pregnancy in Japan: Prevalence, clinical features and delivery-related outcomes. PLoS One. 2021 May 11;16(5):e0251298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251298. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 33974646BACKGROUNDYaiesh SM, Al-Terki AE, Al-Shaiji TF. Safety of Sacral Nerve Stimulation in Pregnancy: A Literature Review. Neuromodulation. 2016 Oct;19(7):770-779. doi: 10.1111/ner.12450. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
PMID: 27286484BACKGROUNDWinkelman JW, Berkowski JA, DelRosso LM, Koo BB, Scharf MT, Sharon D, Zak RS, Kazmi U, Falck-Ytter Y, Shelgikar AV, Trotti LM, Walters AS. Treatment of restless legs syndrome and periodic limb movement disorder: an American Academy of Sleep Medicine clinical practice guideline. J Clin Sleep Med. 2025 Jan 1;21(1):137-152. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.11390.
PMID: 39324694BACKGROUNDWeiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, Boynton MH, Halko H. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3.
PMID: 28851459BACKGROUNDWalters AS, LeBrocq C, Dhar A, Hening W, Rosen R, Allen RP, Trenkwalder C; International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group. Validation of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group rating scale for restless legs syndrome. Sleep Med. 2003 Mar;4(2):121-32. doi: 10.1016/s1389-9457(02)00258-7.
PMID: 14592342BACKGROUNDVahdat M, Sariri E, Miri S, Rohani M, Kashanian M, Sabet A, Zamani B. Prevalence and associated features of restless legs syndrome in a population of Iranian women during pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Oct;123(1):46-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.04.023. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
PMID: 23886452BACKGROUNDTeresi JA, Yu X, Stewart AL, Hays RD. Guidelines for Designing and Evaluating Feasibility Pilot Studies. Med Care. 2022 Jan 1;60(1):95-103. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001664.
PMID: 34812790BACKGROUNDSzymanski JK, Slabuszewska-Jozwiak A, Jakiel G. Sacral Neuromodulation in Pregnant Women-A Case Report and Literature Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 8;19(14):8340. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148340.
PMID: 35886191BACKGROUNDSteinweg K, Nippita T, Cistulli PA, Bin YS. Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with restless legs syndrome in pregnancy: A systematic review. Sleep Med Rev. 2020 Dec;54:101359. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2020.101359. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
PMID: 32805557BACKGROUNDSrivanitchapoom P, Pandey S, Hallett M. Restless legs syndrome and pregnancy: a review. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014 Jul;20(7):716-22. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2014.03.027. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
PMID: 24768121BACKGROUNDSilber MH, Buchfuhrer MJ, Earley CJ, Koo BB, Manconi M, Winkelman JW; Scientific and Medical Advisory Board of the Restless Legs Syndrome Foundation. The Management of Restless Legs Syndrome: An Updated Algorithm. Mayo Clin Proc. 2021 Jul;96(7):1921-1937. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2020.12.026.
PMID: 34218864BACKGROUNDSawatari H, Yoshimura C, Amagase H, Takewaka M, Nakashima K, Imaoka C, Obama H, Miyanaga N, Ando SI. Relationship between Restless legs syndrome associated symptoms and presence of depression during pregnancy. Women Health. 2022 Mar;62(3):265-271. doi: 10.1080/03630242.2022.2055698. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
PMID: 35354362BACKGROUNDSalehi-Pourmehr H, Atayi M, Mahdavi N, Aletaha R, Kashtkar M, Sharifimoghadam S, Hassanzadeh R, Hajebrahimi S. Is sacral neuromodulation effective and safe in pregnancy? A systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn. 2023 Aug;42(6):1329-1343. doi: 10.1002/nau.25224. Epub 2023 Jun 8.
PMID: 37288591BACKGROUNDRoy A, Ojile J, Kram J, Olin J, Rosenberg R, Hudson JD, Bogan RK, Charlesworth JD. Long-term efficacy and safety of tonic motor activation for treatment of medication-refractory restless legs syndrome: A 24-Week Open-Label Extension Study. Sleep. 2023 Oct 11;46(10):zsad188. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsad188.
PMID: 37439365BACKGROUNDRosen H, Yogev Y. Assessment of uterine contractions in labor and delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 May;228(5S):S1209-S1221. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.09.003. Epub 2023 Mar 19.
PMID: 37164494BACKGROUNDOzer I, Guzel I, Orhan G, Erkilinc S, Oztekin N, Ak F, Tasci Y. A prospective case control questionnaire study for restless leg syndrome on 600 pregnant women. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Dec;30(24):2895-2899. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2016.1170801. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
PMID: 27019150BACKGROUNDRamirez JO, Cabrera SA, Hidalgo H, Cabrera SG, Linnebank M, Bassetti CL, Kallweit U. Is preeclampsia associated with restless legs syndrome? Sleep Med. 2013 Sep;14(9):894-6. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
PMID: 23891236BACKGROUNDLiu G, Li L, Zhang J, Xue R, Zhao X, Zhu K, Wang Y, Xiao L, Shangguan J. Restless legs syndrome and pregnancy or delivery complications in China: a representative survey. Sleep Med. 2016 Jan;17:158-62. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2015.02.541. Epub 2015 May 4.
PMID: 26847992BACKGROUNDMiller MA, Mehta N, Clark-Bilodeau C, Bourjeily G. Sleep Pharmacotherapy for Common Sleep Disorders in Pregnancy and Lactation. Chest. 2020 Jan;157(1):184-197. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.09.026. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
PMID: 31622589BACKGROUNDKatsura D, Tsuji S, Hayashi K, Tokoro S, Hoshiyama T, Kita N, Murakami T. Maternal and foetal physiological response of sacral surface electrical stimulation during pregnancy: A preliminary study. Exp Physiol. 2022 May;107(5):508-514. doi: 10.1113/EP090187. Epub 2022 Apr 3.
PMID: 35293045BACKGROUNDJia YJ, Ghi T, Pereira S, Gracia Perez-Bonfils A, Chandraharan E. Pathophysiological interpretation of fetal heart rate tracings in clinical practice. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jun;228(6):622-644. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.05.023.
PMID: 37270259BACKGROUNDJahani Kondori M, Kolla BP, Moore KM, Mansukhani MP. Management of Restless Legs Syndrome in Pregnancy and Lactation. J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720905950. doi: 10.1177/2150132720905950.
PMID: 32054396BACKGROUNDHarrison EG, Keating JL, Morgan PE. Non-pharmacological interventions for restless legs syndrome: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Disabil Rehabil. 2019 Aug;41(17):2006-2014. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1453875. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
PMID: 29561180BACKGROUNDFrenken MWE, van der Woude DAA, Dieleman JP, Oei SG, van Laar JOEH. The association between uterine contraction frequency and fetal scalp pH in women with suspicious or pathological fetal heart rate tracings: A retrospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Apr;271:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.01.023. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
PMID: 35131629BACKGROUNDEvans MI, Britt DW, Worth J, Mussalli G, Evans SM, Devoe LD. Uterine contraction frequency in the last hour of labor: how many contractions are too many? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022 Dec;35(25):8698-8705. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2021.1998893. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
PMID: 34732091BACKGROUNDCharlesworth JD, Adlou B, Singh H, Buchfuhrer MJ. Bilateral high-frequency noninvasive peroneal nerve stimulation evokes tonic leg muscle activation for sleep-compatible reduction of restless legs syndrome symptoms. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023 Jul 1;19(7):1199-1209. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.10536.
PMID: 36856064BACKGROUNDBuysse DJ, Reynolds CF 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. 1989 May;28(2):193-213. doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.
PMID: 2748771BACKGROUNDBuchfuhrer MJ, Baker FC, Singh H, Kolotovska V, Adlou B, Anand H, de Zambotti M, Ismail M, Raghunathan S, Charlesworth JD. Noninvasive neuromodulation reduces symptoms of restless legs syndrome. J Clin Sleep Med. 2021 Aug 1;17(8):1685-1694. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9404.
PMID: 33949942BACKGROUNDBogan RK, Roy A, Kram J, Ojile J, Rosenberg R, Hudson JD, Scheuller HS, Winkelman JW, Charlesworth JD. Efficacy and safety of tonic motor activation (TOMAC) for medication-refractory restless legs syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. Sleep. 2023 Oct 11;46(10):zsad190. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsad190.
PMID: 37458698BACKGROUNDArnold JJ, Gawrys BL. Intrapartum Fetal Monitoring. Am Fam Physician. 2020 Aug 1;102(3):158-167.
PMID: 32735438BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 11, 2025
First Posted
August 27, 2025
Study Start
October 15, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 31, 2026
Last Updated
November 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because the study is a small pilot with a limited sample size and data will only be used for the purposes outlined in the approved protocol. The IRB-approved consent form does not include provisions for external data sharing.