NCT07143253

Brief Summary

Dental caries remains one of the most prevalent oral diseases today. The risk of caries development is highest during the first few years following tooth eruption. Therefore, preventive strategies for dental caries continue to be of great importance. In particular, permanent second molars are highly susceptible to caries during their eruption phase, as the enamel has not yet completed its physiological maturation. This vulnerability is especially pronounced in partially erupted teeth, where the risk of caries formation increases significantly in the absence of effective preventive measures. In this context, fissure sealants are widely used as a preventive approach, particularly in children and adolescents, due to their proven efficacy in caries prevention. In this study, the 12-month clinical performance of resin-based hydrophilic and glass ionomer-based fissure sealants applied to partially erupted permanent first and/or second molars will be evaluated comparatively. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to their inclusion in the study. The aim of this research is to provide scientific evidence to support material selection in the field of preventive dentistry. Previous studies (Ahovuo-Saloranta et al., 2013) have emphasized that long-term clinical success rates have a direct impact on material selection, highlighting the importance of conducting prospective clinical trials. This study is designed as a split-mouth, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial. The reporting of the study will adhere to the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) guidelines. The study will be conducted at the Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, İnönü University. Healthy children aged between 7 and 15 years will be included in the study. Randomization will be performed using a computer-assisted program. Two different fissure sealants will be applied to different teeth in each patient. Application Procedure: All fissure sealants will be applied by a single experienced operator in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Resin-based sealants will be polymerized for 20 seconds using an LED light source. Group A: Hydrophilic fissure sealant Group B: Glass ionomer-based fissure sealant Evaluation Time Points: Immediately after application At 3 months At 6 months At 12 months The following parameters will be assessed by two independent blinded evaluators according to modified USPHS criteria: Retention of the fissure sealant (Complete / Partial / Total loss) Marginal discoloration Development of secondary caries Data will be entered into Microsoft Excel and analyzed using SPSS software. A p-value of \< 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
10mo left

Started Sep 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress45%
Sep 2025Mar 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 10, 2025

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 27, 2025

Completed
14 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 10, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 8, 2026

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2027

Expected
Last Updated

April 23, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

August 10, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 20, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

immature molarsFissure SealantPartially Erupted

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Modified Simonsen Criteria

    Score 0 Fissure sealant is completely in the mouth and there is no new caries. Score 1 Partial loss of fissure sealant, no new caries. Score 2 Partial loss of fissure sealant and new caries. Score 3 Complete loss of fissure sealant, no new caries. Score 4 Complete loss of fissure sealant and new caries

    Follow-up appointments were scheduled for children at 3, 6, and 12 months following the initial treatment.

  • Edge Integrity Evaluation Criteria

    0: The fissure sealant and tooth surface are intact and cannot be distinguished with a probe. 1. The edges of the fissure sealants can be distinguished with a probe. 2. There is a gap along the edge of the fissure sealant and deep cracks reaching the central fossa

    Follow-up appointments were scheduled for children at 3, 6, and 12 months following the initial treatment

  • Marginal Coloration Evaluation Criteria

    0 No color change between fissure sealant and tooth. 1. Color change in only one area. 2. Color change in many areas. 3. Severe color change indicating leakage.

    Follow-up appointments were scheduled for children at 3, 6, and 12 months following the initial treatment

  • Anatomical Form Evaluation Criteria

    0 Consistent with and continuous with occlusal form and structure. 1. Change in anatomical form but all pits and fissures covered. 2. a Partial loss of one or two pits or fissures but no need to repair or replace fissure sealant. 2b Partial loss of pits and fissures, fissure sealant needs to be replaced or repaired. 3 Loss of all pits and fissures. 7 Partial loss due to occlusion 9 Bleb not connected to margins

    Follow-up appointments were scheduled for children at 3, 6, and 12 months following the initial treatment.

Study Arms (2)

Gruop A:UltraSeal XT hydro sealant / hydrophillic pit and fissure sealent

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The presence of moisture and saliva-contamination during the placement of the sealant compromise the quality of adhesion at the sealant-enamel interface, which impacts the ongoing resistance to microleakage of microorganisms. Hydrophilic sealants, which bond effectively to moist enamel surfaces, present a distinct advantage in paediatric dentistry where patient-compliance, isolation, and moisture-control can be particularly challenging.UltraSeal XT® hydro™ is a new moisture-tolerant, self-adhesive, light-cured, acrylate-based, hydrophilic pit, and fissure sealant which has been developed by Ultradent Products, USA. The sealant comprises a 53 wt% mixture of inorganic filler particles that confer radiopacity. This material is reported to "chase" moisture into the pits and fissures, thus eliminating moisture-related failure associated with hydrophobic sealants

Procedure: Preventive pit and fissure sealant application

Gruop B: GC Fuji Triage- glassionomer pit and fissure sealent

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Glass ionomer (GI)-based fissure sealants are considered a valuable treatment alternative, particularly in pediatric dentistry for patients at high risk of caries, due to their ability to chemically bond to dental tissues, release fluoride, exhibit biocompatibility, provide antibacterial effects, and promote the remineralization of hydroxyapatite crystals. The self-bonding, high-fluoride-releasing GC Fuji TRIAGE® is frequently reported in the literature as a fissure sealant, particularly for immature and partially erupted teeth. The use of glass ionomers as fissure sealants is especially emphasized in cases where isolation is difficult.

Procedure: Preventive pit and fissure sealant application

Interventions

Preventive pit and fissure sealant application is a preventive procedure involving the use of flowable resin-based or glass ionomer-based materials to physically cover the occlusal surfaces of teeth, particularly in pits and fissures at high risk of caries development. This barrier prevents plaque accumulation and protects the enamel surface. In this study, no procedures beyond the routine clinical application of the materials will be performed. However, partially erupted permanent teeth with challenging isolation will be specifically selected. Both materials will be applied using a split-mouth design to the teeth of the same participant. This approach will allow for an effective and comparative evaluation of the clinical retention of the material.

Gruop A:UltraSeal XT hydro sealant / hydrophillic pit and fissure sealentGruop B: GC Fuji Triage- glassionomer pit and fissure sealent

Eligibility Criteria

Age10 Years - 15 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Healthy children aged 10-15 years.
  • Partially erupted second permanent molars that are clinically and radiographically confirmed to be caries-free or present with demineralized fissures scored as ICDAS 1-2.
  • Children demonstrating cooperative behavior, with a Frankl Behavior Rating Scale score of 3 or 4.
  • Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S) score ≤ 3
  • Written informed consent obtained from the parent or legal guardian.

You may not qualify if:

  • Fully erupted or completely impacted teeth.
  • Teeth presenting with severe hypoplasia, hypomineralization, extensive restorations, or cavitated carious lesions.
  • History of systemic disease or long-term medication use.
  • Known allergy to resin-based or glass ionomer materials.
  • Presence of parafunctional habits.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University

Malatya, Malatya, 44200, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Penha KJS, Roma FRVO, Filho EMM, Ribeiro CCC, Firoozmand LM. Bioactive self-etching sealant on newly erupted molars: A split-mouth clinical trial. J Dent. 2021 Dec;115:103857. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103857. Epub 2021 Oct 24.

  • Antonson SA, Antonson DE, Brener S, Crutchfield J, Larumbe J, Michaud C, Yazici AR, Hardigan PC, Alempour S, Evans D, Ocanto R. Twenty-four month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants on partially erupted permanent first molars: glass ionomer versus resin-based sealant. J Am Dent Assoc. 2012 Feb;143(2):115-22. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0121.

Study Officials

  • handan vural, Assistant Professor

    Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: In this split-mouth designed study, at least two partially erupted molar teeth from each patient will be included. A random group allocation will be performed, and the appropriate fissure sealant will be applied according to the assigned group.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
assistant professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2025

First Posted

August 27, 2025

Study Start

September 10, 2025

Primary Completion

February 8, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Last Updated

April 23, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

IPD used in the results publication

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, CSR
Time Frame
Beginning 6 months and ending 1 years after the publication of results"
Access Criteria
Access to individual participant data (IPD) and supporting materials will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request. The following details apply: Who can access the data: Qualified academic researchers with a valid scientific purpose. What can be accessed: De-identified IPD, study protocol, statistical analysis plan, informed consent forms, and ethics approval documents. How to access: Interested researchers must submit a written request, including a brief research proposal and documentation of ethics committee approval. Requests should be sent to the corresponding author via email. Data sharing will be conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines and applicable data protection regulations.

Locations