Effects of tDCS on Cognitive Flexibility and EEG Oscillations in Orthorexia Nervosa
1 other identifier
interventional
48
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Orthorexia Nervosa (ON); is a condition characterized by individuals being overly focused on healthy eating habits, constantly checking and classifying the foods they will consume. ON has not yet been clinically defined as an eating disorder or in a different category, and has not been included in DSM-5. Cognitive flexibility can be defined as a person's ability to quickly change their thinking and behaviors to adapt to different situations and changing conditions. It has been reported that cognitive flexibility skills are impaired in ON. There is evidence that tDCS, a neuromodulation method, increases cognitive flexibility skills. On the other hand, although there are EEG studies on eating disorders, there is no EEG study directly studying ON, and there is no information on the EEG profiles of individuals with high ON scores. For this reason, EEG studies on eating disorders and obsessive behaviors are generally generalized to orthorexia nervosa and are interpreted. This study aims to compare the EEG oscillations and cognitive flexibility skills of individuals with high ON scores with a control group and to examine the effects of anodal tDCS application on these two variables. For this purpose, a total of 48 individuals, 24 healthy and 24 high ON scores, will be included in the study. Participants will be randomly assigned to tDCS experimental and control groups. Therefore, 48 participants will be divided into 4 different subgroups of 12 people each. Data collection tools will be Informed Consent Form, Demographic Information Form, Beck Depression Inventory, Orthorexia Nervosa Test (TON-17), Cognitive flexibility task. First, participants will be subjected to a cognitive flexibility task by taking simultaneous EEG recordings, then tDCS stimulation will be initiated (active or sham) and after stimulation, a cognitive flexibility task will be performed by taking simultaneous EEG recordings again. EEG analyses will be performed using the Brain-Vision Analyzer program. Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance (within-group and between-groups) will be used in statistical analyses.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 18, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 26, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2027
April 1, 2026
March 1, 2026
1.2 years
August 18, 2025
March 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in EEG Oscillations in individuals with Orthorexia Nervosa for active vs. sham stimulation
The EEG oscillations recording the event brain oscillations during the cognitive flexibility task from pre and post measurements. There are the five frequencies band which are Delta (0.5-3,5 Hz), Theta (4-7 Hz), Alpha (8-13 Hz), Beta (15-30 Hz) and Gamma (30-100 Hz). Data will be record simultaneously and analyzed. The analysis will be done with the BrainVisionAnalyzer program and power analysis will be made in Delta, Theta, Alpha, Beta, Gamma bands and the averages will be compared. Oscillations will be evaluated in terms of averages changing as an indicator of the effect of the neuromodulation preceding it.
Baseline, 5 minutes after completion of the active/sham stimulation
Change in Cognitive Flexibility Task score in individuals with Orthorexia Nervosa for active vs. sham stimulation
A structured task-switching paradigm will be used to measure cognitive flexibility skills from pre and post test score in individuals with Orthorexia Nervosa \* The paradigm consists of two conditions: trials with a task switch and trials without a task switch. The experiment will include two blocks, with a total of 320 trials. Each block will contain 160 phases, consisting of 80 trials with a task switch and 80 trials without a task switch. Score averages will compare between pre and post test. Data will be record Excel by Psychopy program simultaneously. Performance will be evaluated for accuracy as an indicator of the effect of the neuromodulation preceding it.
Baseline, 20 minutes after completion of the active/sham stimulation
Study Arms (2)
Experimental group
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will take active tDCS stimulation
Control group
SHAM COMPARATORParticipants will take sham tDCS stimulation
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being between the ages of 18-40,
- Having a score of 17 or less on the Beck Depression Inventory
- Having a score of 61 or more on the Test for Orthorexia Nervosa (TON-17) for the orthorexia group
You may not qualify if:
- Having a history of serious neurological and psychiatric illness,
- Currently taking medication that alters the cortical excitability level,
- Having visual defects that cannot be corrected with glasses
- Use of intracranial metal objects, implanted stimulating devices or pacemakers
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Istanbul Medipol University
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (11)
Emek Savas DD, Yerlikaya D, G Yener G, Oktem Tanor O. Validity, Reliability and Normative Data of the Stroop Test Capa Version. Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2020 Spring;31(1):9-21. doi: 10.5080/u23549. English, Turkish.
PMID: 32594475RESULTDu M, Peng Y, Li Y, Zhu Y, Yang S, Li J, Zou F, Wang Y, Wu X, Zhang Y, Zhang M. Effect of trait anxiety on cognitive flexibility: Evidence from event-related potentials and resting-state EEG. Biol Psychol. 2022 Apr;170:108319. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108319. Epub 2022 Mar 22.
PMID: 35331781RESULTDong G, Wang Y, Chen X. Anodal occipital tDCS enhances spontaneous alpha activity. Neurosci Lett. 2020 Mar 16;721:134796. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.134796. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
PMID: 32006627RESULTDonaldson PH, Kirkovski M, Yang JS, Bekkali S, Enticott PG. High-definition tDCS to the right temporoparietal junction modulates slow-wave resting state power and coherence in healthy adults. J Neurophysiol. 2019 Oct 1;122(4):1735-1744. doi: 10.1152/jn.00338.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
PMID: 31461371RESULTDarna M, Stolz C, Jauch HS, Strumpf H, Hopf JM, Seidenbecher CI, Schott BH, Richter A. Frontal theta oscillations and cognitive flexibility: Age-related modulations in EEG activity. Aging Brain. 2025 Jun 24;8:100142. doi: 10.1016/j.nbas.2025.100142. eCollection 2025.
PMID: 40620518RESULTChrysikou EG, Hamilton RH, Coslett HB, Datta A, Bikson M, Thompson-Schill SL. Noninvasive transcranial direct current stimulation over the left prefrontal cortex facilitates cognitive flexibility in tool use. Cogn Neurosci. 2013;4(2):81-9. doi: 10.1080/17588928.2013.768221.
PMID: 23894253RESULTCavinato M, Genna C, Formaggio E, Gregorio C, Storti SF, Manganotti P, Casanova E, Piperno R, Piccione F. Behavioural and electrophysiological effects of tDCS to prefrontal cortex in patients with disorders of consciousness. Clin Neurophysiol. 2019 Feb;130(2):231-238. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.10.018. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
PMID: 30580246RESULTBorwick C, Lal R, Lim LW, Stagg CJ, Aquili L. Dopamine depletion effects on cognitive flexibility as modulated by tDCS of the dlPFC. Brain Stimul. 2020 Jan-Feb;13(1):105-108. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.08.016. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
PMID: 31494070RESULTBerchio C, Annen LC, Bouamoud Y, Micali N. Temporal dynamics of cognitive flexibility in adolescents with anorexia nervosa: A high-density EEG study. Eur J Neurosci. 2023 Mar;57(6):962-980. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15921. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
PMID: 36683346RESULTAlizadehgoradel J, Nejati V, Sadeghi Movahed F, Imani S, Taherifard M, Mosayebi-Samani M, Vicario CM, Nitsche MA, Salehinejad MA. Repeated stimulation of the dorsolateral-prefrontal cortex improves executive dysfunctions and craving in drug addiction: A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study. Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):582-593. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.12.028. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
PMID: 32289681RESULTAboulafia-Brakha T, Manuel AL, Ptak R. Prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates affective flexibility. Neuropsychologia. 2016 Jun;86:13-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.03.030. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
PMID: 27039163RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- Participants will not know that which group they will be in
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof. Dr., Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 18, 2025
First Posted
August 26, 2025
Study Start
November 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2027
Last Updated
April 1, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share