Effectiveness of Elastic Chains Versus Elastics in Maxillary Canine Retraction
CREST
Evaluation of the Effectiveness ff Elastic Chains Versus Elastics in Maxillary Canine Retraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
33
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of Elastics and Elastic chains in maxillary canine retraction. Participants of this study were patients undergoing maxillary canine retraction after first premolar extraction. The study aimed to determine an effective method for better controlling tooth movement. This study was initiated on 01-2024. Initially, I was not aware of the importance of early registration on ClinicalTrials.gov. Registration was completed after the study began to ensure transparency and adherence to ethical guidelines. All study procedures and protocols have been conducted under the supervision of the academic advisor. All study procedures and protocols have been followed according to institutional and ethical guidelines
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 30, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 11, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 26, 2025
CompletedSeptember 2, 2025
August 1, 2025
1.2 years
August 15, 2025
August 25, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Rate of maxillary canine retraction by elastics and elastic chains on each side
The canine retraction rate was measured on superimposed digital casts of pre and post retraction models.
Difference between pe and post retraction canine position during 15 weeks
Measurement of the Tipping movement occurred by each method
Tipping angle on each side was measured on Orthopantomograms (OPG).
Pre and post retraction during 15 weeks
Measurements of rotation resulted by elastic and elastic chain
The rotational angle was measured on each side by the digital models
Pre and post-retraction during 25 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Elastic chains
EXPERIMENTALThis side received maxillary canine retraction using elastic chains
Elastics
EXPERIMENTALThis side received maxillary canine retraction with Elastics on the contralateral side of the arch
Interventions
Elastic chain used to apply force that is capable of canine retraction. The chains were attached between canine bracket and molar band on the side that selected Randomly.
Elastics were used to bring a continuous force for maxillary canine retraction in orthodontic patients. Elastics were stretched between the canine bracket and the molar band to retract the canine distally
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients' treatment required 1st premolar extractions in the maxillary arch and space closure involving canine retraction.
- Teeth in the buccal segments were without any gross anatomic root anomalies as determined by panoramic radiographs.
- There is no gross evidence of asymmetric bone loss in the buccal segments of a given arch as determined by panoramic radiographs.
- Crown/root ratios of contralateral canines and premolars are within 3 mm of one another as determined by panoramic radiographs.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with gross anatomical anomalies in upper maxillary canines
- Patients with growth and development problems.
- Evidence of bone loss.
- Presence of Impacted Canine.
- History of long-term use of NSAIDs and corticosteroids or drugs affect bone metabolism. Patients who reported any medication interfering with bone metabolism or patients with severe skeletal discrepancies indicated for orthognathic treatment.
- Patients with latex materials allergy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Deparyment of Orthodontics - Faculty of Dentistry- Sana'a University
Sanaa, 967, Yemen
Related Publications (1)
Jagtap SB, Bhosale VI, Patil AS. Comparative evaluation of interrupted and intermittent forces on canine retraction: an in vivo study. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2021 Oct 31;63(5):686-691. doi: 10.3897/folmed.63.e54247.
PMID: 35851202RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Asraa H Taha, MSc Student
Faculty of Dentistry - Sana'a University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Reema A Al-Eriani, PhD of Pedodontics
Faculty of Dentistry- Sana'a University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ghamdan A Al-Harazi, PhD of Orthodontics
Faculty of Dentistry- Sana'a University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Due to the nature of the clinical intervention, neither the patients nor the investigator could be blinded to the treatment. However, researcher blinding was implemented at the data measurement stage through coding of OPG images and dental models by inter examiner, before measurements began. The researcher was blinded to patient identities and the type of retraction method used on each side (elastic chain vs. elastics).
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Resident in orthodontics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 15, 2025
First Posted
August 26, 2025
Study Start
January 30, 2024
Primary Completion
April 11, 2025
Study Completion
May 1, 2025
Last Updated
September 2, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Start Date: 01-Jan-2026 End Date: 31-Dec-2030
- Access Criteria
- Qualified researchers who submit a valid research proposal will be able to access de-identified individual participant data, including digital models and treatment outcome measurements. Data will be available through a secure online repository upon approval of the research proposal.
I plan to share de-identified individual participant data (IPD) related to the main outcomes of this study. The data will be available upon reasonable request and after the results are published. Only researchers with valid proposals will be allowed access. Data will be shared through secure methods and only for academic purposes