Autogenous Bone Ring Versus Split Bone Block for Management of Posterior Atrophic Mandible
1 other identifier
interventional
16
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Teeth loss in the posterior mandible initiates residual ridge resorption especially in vertical direction, this causes difficulty in implant placement so ridge augmentation must be done either simultaneous with implant placement or in a staged approach Aim: To evaluate the effect of bone ring technique versus split bone block technique with simultaneous implant clinically on primary and secondary
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 26, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 5, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 5, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 21, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 26, 2025
CompletedAugust 26, 2025
August 1, 2025
11 months
August 21, 2025
August 21, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change in implant stability
Implant stability will be recorded immediately after placement (1ry stability) and after 6 months (2ry stability ) by using osstell device. The result is presented in form of ISQ value from 1to 100, the higher the ISQ the higher the stability of implant(
Immediate and 6 months
Change in pain scores
Pain will be assessed for 7 days postoperatively using 10-point visual analouge scale (VAS) (0-1=None, 2-4=mild, 5-7=moderate, 8-10=severe ).
up to 7 days
Change in marginal bone level
At buccal, lingual, mesial, and distal sites will be evaluated radiographically from the shoulder of the implant to the alveolar crest.
6 and 9 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in bone density
6 months
Change in edema
up to 7 days
Study Arms (2)
Bone ring technique
EXPERIMENTALSplit bone block technique
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Patients in this group will be treated with the bone ring technique. An implant drill will be used next to prepare central osteotomies corresponding to the final implant diameter to be placed in the center of the disc converting it to a "bone ring".
Patients of this group will be treated with split bone block with simultaneous implant technique. The bone shell will be split into two bone shells each 1 \~ 2 mm in thickness using a disc.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with missing posterior mandibular teeth.
- Vertical bone defect from 3 to 4 mm.
- Adequate zone of keratinized tissue.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of infection or periapical lesions in adjacent teeth.
- Medically compromised patients with a condition that affects the procedure.
- Insufficient inter-arch distance.
- Bruxism or clenching.
- Alcoholism.
- Heavy Smokers.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Outpatient Clinic of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt
Alexandria, Azarita, 00203, Egypt
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 21, 2025
First Posted
August 26, 2025
Study Start
August 26, 2024
Primary Completion
August 5, 2025
Study Completion
August 5, 2025
Last Updated
August 26, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08