NCT07138248

Brief Summary

This study aims to evaluate the position of intrauterine devices (IUDs) six weeks after insertion using transvaginal three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound. Women aged 18-45 who undergo postpartum IUD insertion, either vaginally or during cesarean delivery, will be included. The study will compare the accuracy of 3D ultrasound versus conventional two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound in detecting IUD displacement, including partial expulsion, embedment, or perforation. Participants will receive a copper T380A IUD, and all procedures will follow standard clinical protocols. Ultrasound assessments will be conducted six weeks after insertion to confirm proper placement. Data collected will include demographic information, reproductive history, and ultrasound findings. The primary outcome is the prevalence of IUD displacement at six weeks. Secondary outcomes include the diagnostic accuracy of 3D versus 2D ultrasound. This study is designed to improve early detection of malpositioned IUDs, enhancing patient safety and contraceptive effectiveness.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
138

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
7mo left

Started Sep 2025

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress55%
Sep 2025Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 16, 2025

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 22, 2025

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2025

Completed
11 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2026

Expected
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

August 22, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

11 months

First QC Date

August 16, 2025

Last Update Submit

August 16, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Intrauterine Device3D Transvaginal UltrasoundPostpartum Contraception

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Prevalence of IUD displacement 6 weeks after insertion

    The proportion of postpartum women whose copper T380A IUD is malpositioned, partially expelled, embedded, or perforated as determined by transvaginal ultrasound at 6 weeks post-insertion

    6 weeks after IUD insertion

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Accuracy of 3D vs 2D transvaginal ultrasound in detecting IUD displacement

    6 weeks after IUD insertion

  • Accuracy of 3D vs 2D transvaginal ultrasound in detecting IUD displacement

    6 weeks after IUD insertion

Study Arms (1)

Postpartum Women Receiving IUD

Women aged 18-45 who undergo postpartum copper T380A IUD insertion, either vaginally or during cesarean delivery, and who consent to follow-up ultrasound at 6 weeks to assess IUD position.

Biological: 2D Transvaginal Ultrasound

Interventions

Three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound used to assess the same outcomes as 2D, providing volumetric imaging and coronal reconstruction to detect displacement or malposition of the IUD

Postpartum Women Receiving IUD

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Postpartum women aged 18-45 undergoing copper T380A IUD insertion at Assiut General Hospital or Women's Health Hospital, Assiut, Egypt, who consent to follow-up ultrasound assessment six weeks after insertion.

You may qualify if:

  • Females aged 18-45 years
  • Postpartum women receiving copper T380A IUD insertion, either vaginal or cesarean
  • Agree to participate and provide written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Uterine anomalies (e.g., bicornuate uterus)
  • Significant uterine pathology (e.g., large fibroids)
  • Puerperal sepsis
  • Refusal to insert IUD
  • Past history of IUD complications

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Women's Health Hospital, Assiut

Asyut, 17155, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (10)

  • Abuhamad AZ, Singleton S, Zhao Y, Bocca S. The Z technique: an easy approach to the display of the mid-coronal plane of the uterus in volume sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2006 May;25(5):607-12. doi: 10.7863/jum.2006.25.5.607.

    PMID: 16632784BACKGROUND
  • Benacerraf BR, Shipp TD, Bromley B. Three-dimensional ultrasound detection of abnormally located intrauterine contraceptive devices which are a source of pelvic pain and abnormal bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Jul;34(1):110-5. doi: 10.1002/uog.6421.

    PMID: 19565532BACKGROUND
  • Nosseir MA, et al. Role of 3D-Ultrasound in Patients with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding for Detection of IUCD Malposition. Benha Med J. 2024;41(4):1-9.

    BACKGROUND
  • Thonneau P, Goulard H, Goyaux N. Risk factors for intrauterine device failure: a review. Contraception. 2001 Jul;64(1):33-7. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(01)00215-3.

    PMID: 11535211BACKGROUND
  • Benacerraf BR, Shipp TD, Lyons JG, Bromley B. Width of the normal uterine cavity in premenopausal women and effect of parity. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;116(2 Pt 1):305-310. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181e6cc10.

    PMID: 20664389BACKGROUND
  • Wildemeersch D, Pett A, Jandi S, Hasskamp T, Rowe P, Vrijens M. Precision intrauterine contraception may significantly increase continuation of use: a review of long-term clinical experience with frameless copper-releasing intrauterine contraception devices. Int J Womens Health. 2013 Apr 30;5:215-25. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S42784. Print 2013.

    PMID: 23658502BACKGROUND
  • Teal SB, Sheeder J. IUD use in adolescent mothers: retention, failure and reasons for discontinuation. Contraception. 2012 Mar;85(3):270-4. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.001.

    PMID: 22067773BACKGROUND
  • Lopez LM, Bernholc A, Zeng Y, Allen RH, Bartz D, O'Brien PA, Hubacher D. Interventions for pain with intrauterine device insertion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 29;2015(7):CD007373. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007373.pub3.

    PMID: 26222246BACKGROUND
  • Goldstuck ND, Wildemeersch D. Role of uterine forces in intrauterine device embedment, perforation, and expulsion. Int J Womens Health. 2014 Aug 7;6:735-44. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S63167. eCollection 2014.

    PMID: 25143756BACKGROUND
  • Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology, Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Work Group. Practice Bulletin No. 186: Long-Acting Reversible Contraception: Implants and Intrauterine Devices. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;130(5):e251-e269. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002400.

    PMID: 29064972BACKGROUND

Central Study Contacts

Amira Khaled Khafaga, resident

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
CASE ONLY
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Resident, Obstetric and Gynecology Department

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2025

First Posted

August 22, 2025

Study Start

September 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

August 22, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations