POPQ Associated With Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
POP-LAP
1 other identifier
observational
2,000
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The goal of this observational study is to evaluate the impact of different hysterectomy (removal of the uterus) techniques on the risk of pelvic organ prolapse (situation when one or more of your pelvic organs like your bladder, uterus, or rectum have dropped down or slipped out of their normal position, sometimes even bulging into the vagina) and urinary incontinence (leaking urine unexpectedly) in women aged 18-85 who underwent hysterectomy or supracervical hysterectomy (removing of the uterus without its cervix) for benign (not cancer) conditions. The main question is: to check how different surgical technique (laparoscopic, with opening the abdomen, vaginal and robotic) increase the risk of pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence There is no randomization or control group; comparisons will be made between surgery types based on clinical and questionnaire data. Participants will:
- Receive an invitation to participate if they underwent hysterectomy between 2021-2025.
- Fill out validated quality of life questionnaires (P-QOL, POPDI-6, PFIQ-7) every two years.
- Attend follow-up clinical pelvic exams every two years to assess vaginal cuff healing, pelvic organ prolapses (POP-Q system), and urinary symptoms. This prospective, non-commercial, multicenter study plans to enroll 2,000 women and will run from July 1, 2025, to July 1, 2036
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Oct 2025
Longer than P75 for all trials
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 22, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2036
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2037
August 22, 2025
August 1, 2025
10.8 years
August 2, 2025
August 15, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Assessment of the impact of different types of hysterectomy/uterine amputation on the incidence of urinary incontinence
Ingelmann-Sundberg scale for symptoms of stress urinary incontinence. The Ingelmann-Sundberg scale is a grading system used to assess the severity of stress urinary incontinence (SUI). It categorizes SUI based on the degree of physical activity that provokes urine leakage. The scale has three grades, with Grade I being the mildest and Grade III the most severe. Grade I - Urine leakage occurs with a relevant increase in abdominal pressure, such as during coughing, sneezing, or laughing. Grade II - Urine leakage occurs with a lesser increase in abdominal pressure, such as during activities like running, picking up objects from the floor, or walking. Grade III - Urine leakage occurs with minimal physical exertion, such as during walking, stair climbing, or even while standing or lying down. The assessment is based on medical interview with the patient performed during clinical visit.
At baseline and at 2-year intervals (Year 2, Year 4, Year 6, Year 8, and Year 10) through study completion; on average of 10 years.
Assessment of the impact of different types of hysterectomy/uterine amputation on the incidence of overactive bladder.
OABSS Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) was used to assess symptoms of overactive bladder. The scale consists of 7 questions on a five-point Likert scale that refer to every symptom of OAB: 1 for nocturia, 1 for urinary frequency, 3 for urgency, 1 for urge incontinence, and 1 generic question about bladder control. The total result is scored from 0 to 28, with patients with higher scores reporting worse symptoms.
At baseline and at 2-year intervals (Year 2, Year 4, Year 6, Year 8, and Year 10) through study completion; on average of 10 years.
Assessment of the impact of different types of hysterectomy/uterine amputation on the incidence of pelvic organ prolapse
POPQ - Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Quantification. The assessment is based on gynecological examination. The system measures the position of the most distal portion of the prolapse to the hymen level. 5 stages are described: * Stage 0: No prolapse * Stage I: Most distal prolapse is more than 1 cm above the hymen * Stage II: Most distal prolapse is between 1 cm above and 1 cm below the hymen * Stage III: Most distal prolapse is more than 1 cm below hymen but 2 cm shorter than total vaginal length * Stage IV: Complete eversion
At baseline and at 2-year intervals (Year 2, Year 4, Year 6, Year 8, and Year 10) through study completion; on average of 10 years.
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Complications
up to 30 days postoperatively
Assessment of the impact of different types of hysterectomy/uterine amputation on quality of life - by using P-QOL
At baseline and at 2-year intervals (Year 2, Year 4, Year 6, Year 8, and Year 10) through study completion; on average of 10 years.
Assessment of the impact of different types of hysterectomy/uterine amputation on quality of life - by using POPDI-6
At baseline and at 2-year intervals (Year 2, Year 4, Year 6, Year 8, and Year 10) through study completion; on average of 10 years.
Assessment of the impact of different types of hysterectomy/uterine amputation on quality of life - by using PFIQ-7
At baseline and at 2-year intervals (Year 2, Year 4, Year 6, Year 8, and Year 10) through study completion; on average of 10 years.
Study Arms (6)
Lap-hyst
Women who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign conditions
Robot-hyst
Women who underwent robotic hysterectomy for benign conditions
Vaginal-Hyst
Women who underwent vaginal hysterectomy for benign conditions
Abdom-Hyst
Women who underwent abdominal hysterectomy for benign conditions
SAH
Women who underwent supracervical abdominal hysterectomy for benign conditions
LASH
Women who underwent Laparoscopic Assisted Supracervical Hysterectomy for benign conditions
Interventions
All study participants will be evaluated to assess: * Healing of the vaginal stump in the case of a total hysterectomy (normal/abnormal), * Symptoms of stress urinary incontinence (Ingelmann-Sundber scale, where 0 - no symptoms, Grade I - symptoms with coughing, pressure on the suprapubic area, laughing, or strenuous exertion, Grade II - loss of urine when levering, running, or climbing stairs, Grade III - loss of urine when lying down or standing without physical exertion) * Symptoms of an overactive bladder - present, absent * Symptoms of prolapse in the anterior and posterior compartments (assessed based on the POPQ scale) with an assessment of the defect site based on the de Lancey classification The examination will be performed by or with the assistance of a specialist in obstetrics and gynecology
Eligibility Criteria
All women operated in selected time-frame in study centers for benign conditions
You may qualify if:
- persons who underwent total or subtotal hysterectomy for benign conditions regardless of the type of surgery
- agree to participate and to follow-up
You may not qualify if:
- having uterus
- health state - ECOG \>2
- pelvic organ prolapse prior to the surgery
- surgery due to malignant conditions (ovarian, cervical or endometrial cancer)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Department of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Gynaecological Oncology, University Clinical Centre, Medical University of Silesia
Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship, 40-752, Poland
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Szpital Zakonu Bonifratrów pw. Aniołów Stróżów
Katowice, Poland
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Warsaw
Warsaw, Poland
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Szpital Bielański
Warsaw, Poland
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 10 Years
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Prof.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 2, 2025
First Posted
August 22, 2025
Study Start
October 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2036
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2037
Last Updated
August 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- 01.07.2026 - indefinitely
- Access Criteria
- All academic researches on request
Anonymized data (all) will be shared on request