LIMA Protocol Towards Palatal Fistula and Maxillary Growth in Cleft Palate
1 other identifier
interventional
35
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized controlled trial compared palatoplasty outcomes using the LIMA protocol (Hybrid and one-flap techniques) versus the RSCM protocol (two-flap technique) in patients with unilateral Veau III-IV cleft palate at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital from January 2022 to December 2024.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2022
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2022
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 8, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 22, 2025
CompletedAugust 22, 2025
August 1, 2025
3 years
August 8, 2025
August 14, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Maxillary Size Indicators Observed From Dental Casts
Maxillary growth is assessed by measuring its size based on indicators obtained from dental casts before surgery, 1 month post-surgery, and 6 months post-surgery. There will be 4 indicators, namely: 1. 'CC = primary inter-canine width 2. 'TT = inter-tuberosity width 3. 'ICC = length from incisivus to the 'CC line (indicating anterior palatal length) 4. 'ITT = length from incisivus to the 'TT line (indicating overall palatal length)
From the time of surgery until 6 months post-operatively
Palatal Fistula by Pittsburgh Classification
A palatal fistula is an abnormal opening in the palate that persists or develops after cleft palate repair, creating a connection between the oral and nasal cavities, excluding openings due to wound/ suture dehiscence. The location of opening will be Classified using Pittsburgh Classification; Type I: uvula; Type II: soft palate; Type III: junction between the soft and hard palate; Type IV: hard palate; Type V: junction between the primary and secondary palate; Type VI: lingual-alveolar; Type VII: labial-alveolar.
From the time of surgery until 6 months post-operatively
Study Arms (2)
LIMA Protocol
EXPERIMENTALLIMA Protocol classifies cases of cleft palate based on the cleft severity (using palatal index), and guide which method of cleft palate repair surgery should be done
RSCM Protocol
ACTIVE COMPARATORRSCM Protocol guide which method of cleft palate repair surgery should be done in a cleft palate (without classifying based on cleft palate severity/ palatal index)
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate aged 9 months to 2 years who agreed to be research subjects
- Patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate who underwent palatoplasty surgery at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who refuse to be research subjects and do not want to sign consent form
- Patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate who have previously undergone cleft palate repair/ palatoplasty
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital
Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta, 10430, Indonesia
Related Publications (12)
Chiu YT, Liao YF. Is cleft severity related to maxillary growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate? Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012 Sep;49(5):535-40. doi: 10.1597/10-044. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
PMID: 21214323BACKGROUNDFarronato G, Kairyte L, Giannini L, Galbiati G, Maspero C. How various surgical protocols of the unilateral cleft lip and palate influence the facial growth and possible orthodontic problems? Which is the best timing of lip, palate and alveolus repair? literature review. Stomatologija. 2014;16(2):53-60.
PMID: 25209227BACKGROUNDParwaz MA, Sharma RK, Parashar A, Nanda V, Biswas G, Makkar S. Width of cleft palate and postoperative palatal fistula--do they correlate? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2009 Dec;62(12):1559-63. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.05.048. Epub 2008 Oct 5.
PMID: 18838320BACKGROUNDTodorov AB, Bolling DR. A computerized file for studying growth development in achondroplasia. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1974;10(9):241-4. No abstract available.
PMID: 4422204BACKGROUNDHui BK, Lai LH, Nguyen PD, Yee KS, Martz MG, Bradley JP, et al. Maxillary Hypoplasia in the Cleft Patient: Contribution of Dental Agenesis to Le Fort I Advancement Surgery. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2014;72(9):e56-e7.
BACKGROUNDSmith DM, Vecchione L, Jiang S, Ford M, Deleyiannis FW, Haralam MA, Naran S, Worrall CI, Dudas JR, Afifi AM, Marazita ML, Losee JE. The Pittsburgh Fistula Classification System: a standardized scheme for the description of palatal fistulas. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2007 Nov;44(6):590-4. doi: 10.1597/06-204.1.
PMID: 18177198BACKGROUNDRossell-Perry P, Caceres Nano E, Gavino-Gutierrez AM. Association between palatal index and cleft palate repair outcomes in patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014 May-Jun;16(3):206-10. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2013.2537.
PMID: 24652124BACKGROUNDLima Protocol for Cleft Palate Repair in Cleft and Craniofacial Centre Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Indonesia: A Preliminary Study. J Plast Rekons. 2024;9(1):7-12.
BACKGROUNDRossell-Perry P, Cotrina-Rabanal O, Figallo-Hudtwalcker O, Gonzalez-Vereau A. Effect of Relaxing Incisions on the Maxillary Growth after Primary Unilateral Cleft Palate Repair in Mild and Moderate Cases: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Jan 16;5(1):e1201. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001201. eCollection 2017 Jan.
PMID: 28203502BACKGROUNDRossell-Perry P, Cotrinal-Rabanal O, Caceres-Nano E. One-flap Palatoplasty: A Cohort Study to Evaluate a Technique for Unilateral Cleft Palate Repair. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015 May 7;3(4):e373. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000342. eCollection 2015 Apr.
PMID: 25973351BACKGROUNDRossell-Perry P, Luque-Tipula M. The Lima Surgical Protocol for Cleft Palate Repair. J Craniofac Surg. 2020 Sep;31(6):1533-1538. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000006331.
PMID: 32195838BACKGROUNDKreshanti P, Sari VA, Wangge G, Wahyuni LK. Speech Outcome Evaluation Of Cleft Palate Patients Underwent Palatoplasty In Plastic Surgery Division Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Indonesia. J Plast Rekonst. 2018;5(1):160-70.
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, Head of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Division
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 8, 2025
First Posted
August 22, 2025
Study Start
January 1, 2022
Primary Completion
December 31, 2024
Study Completion
December 31, 2024
Last Updated
August 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to concerns regarding patient privacy and confidentiality, as well as institutional policies that limit the sharing of sensitive clinical data without additional ethical approvals and data use agreements