Evaluation of the Survival of Fissure Sealants Applied With Different Pretreatment Methods on Permanent First Molars: A One-Year Follow-Up

NCT07136051 | Active Not Recruiting

• 1 other identifier: 7706
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 40
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effect of two different pretreatment protocols-enamel deproteinization and bonding agent application-on the one-year survival of fissure sealants applied to permanent first molars in children. Background: Dental caries is a preventable yet highly prevalent multifactorial disease. Deep pits and fissures are particularly susceptible to caries development, especially in newly erupted molars. Although fissure sealants are considered one of the most effective preventive methods, their clinical success is largely dependent on long-term retention. Contamination of etched enamel surfaces with saliva or gingival fluid is a primary cause of sealant failure. To improve sealant adhesion, several pretreatment methods have been suggested, including bonding agents and enamel deproteinization. Methods: This randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial with a split-mouth design was conducted on healthy children aged 7-14 years. Each child contributed at least three permanent first molars to the study, randomly assigned to one of three groups: Group A - Acid etching + sealant; Group B - Acid etching + deproteinization + sealant; Group C - Acid etching + bonding agent + sealant. Clinical evaluations were performed at 3, 6, and 12 months using visual and tactile methods. Sealant retention, caries incidence, and marginal discoloration were recorded based on standardized criteria. Results \& Conclusion: This study seeks to clarify whether bonding agent or deproteinization pretreatment significantly improves sealant retention and reduces caries incidence compared to the conventional approach. Findings may contribute to defining the most effective clinical protocol for fissure sealant application, ultimately enhancing caries prevention and long-term treatment success in pediatric dental care.

Conditions

Fissure Sealant; Deproteinization; Bonding Agent; Molar Teeth; Etching

Keywords

fissure sealant; deproteinization; bonding agent; etching

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

• Modified Simonsen Criteria

  Score 0 Fissure sealant is completely in the mouth and there is no new caries. Score 1 Partial loss of fissure sealant, no new caries. Score 2 Partial loss of fissure sealant and new caries. Score 3 Complete loss of fissure sealant, no new caries. Score 4 Complete loss of fissure sealant and new caries

  Follow-up appointments were scheduled for children at 3, 6, and 12 months following the initial treatment.

• Edge Integrity Evaluation Criteria

  0: The fissure sealant and tooth surface are intact and cannot be distinguished with a probe. 1: The edges of the fissure sealants can be distinguished with a probe. 2: There is a gap along the edge of the fissure sealant and deep cracks reaching the central fossa

  Follow-up appointments were scheduled for children at 3, 6, and 12 months following the initial treatment

• Marginal Coloration Evaluation Criteria

  0 No color change between fissure sealant and tooth. 1:Color change in only one area. 2:Color change in many areas. 3:Severe color change indicating leakage.

  Follow-up appointments were scheduled for children at 3, 6, and 12 months following the initial treatment.

• Anatomical Form Evaluation Criteria

  0 Consistent with and continuous with occlusal form and structure. 1 Change in anatomical form but all pits and fissures covered. 2a Partial loss of one or two pits or fissures but no need to repair or replace fissure sealant. 2b Partial loss of pits and fissures, fissure sealant needs to be replaced or repaired. 3 Loss of all pits and fissures. 7 Partial loss due to occlusion 9 Bleb not connected to margins

  Follow-up appointments were scheduled for children at 3, 6, and 12 months following the initial treatment.

Study Arms (3)

Group A: Acid etching + sealant

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Sealant application is a preventive conservative approach involving the introduction of sealants into the pits and fissures of caries prone teeth; this sealant then bonds to the tooth micromechanically, providing a physical barrier that keeps bacteria away from their source of nutrients. Acid pretreatment of the enamel to enhance retention is considered a standard procedure prior to the application of resin-based fissure sealants. Currently, the most commonly used phosphoric acid concentrations are 35% and 37%.

Procedure: Ethcing; Procedure: Application of resin-based fissure sealant

Group B: Acid etching + deproteinization + sealant

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The use of phosphoric acid is a well-accepted, conventional method used to create micro-porosities, which are the key in providing sealant retention. However, organic remnants as well as fissure morphology and aprismatic enamel structure can decrease etching ability and thus prevent adequate adhesion.Conventional phosphoric acid can only demineralize the inorganic component of enamel and cannot completely remove the protein content within the enamel. Some proteins are also embedded within the enamel crystals. The inadequate penetration of resin into enamel may also result from the Type 3 etching pattern observed after conventional etching. Studies have shown that after using sodium hypochlorite to remove enamel proteins, Type 1 and Type 2 etching patterns are more frequently observed. The literature indicates that the enamel deproteinization technique with sodium hypochlorite is an effective method for removing organic material from the occlusal enamel surfaces of teeth.

Procedure: Ethcing; Procedure: Deproteinization; Procedure: Application of resin-based fissure sealant

Group C: Acid etching + bonding agent + sealant

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Various methods for preparing fissures, such as pumice prophylaxis, bonding agents, lasers, air abrasion, and sodium hypochlorite deproteinization, have been recommended to improve sealant retention The use of adhesive systems prior to fissure sealant application had a positive effect on increasing penetration and improving the retention rate. It also appears that the use of bonding-agents that involve a separate acid-etching step (fourth and fifth generations) provides better sealant retention than self-etching adhesives (sixth and seventh generations).

Procedure: Ethcing; Procedure: Bonding; Procedure: Application of resin-based fissure sealant

Interventions

Ethcing PROCEDURE

Etching: After polishing all teeth included in the study with a polishing brush, Vococid (Voca, Germany) etching gel will be applied to the surface and left for 15 seconds, then rinsed and dried.

Group A: Acid etching + sealant; Group B: Acid etching + deproteinization + sealant; Group C: Acid etching + bonding agent + sealant

Deproteinization PROCEDURE

The teeth randomly assigned to Group B will receive 5.25% NaOCl applied with a sterile cotton pellet for 60 seconds after acid etching, followed by rinsing and drying.

Group B: Acid etching + deproteinization + sealant

Bonding PROCEDURE

The teeth randomly assigned to Group C will receive Futurabond® M+ (Voco, Germany) applied with a brush following acid etching. After gently drying with air for 5 seconds, the bonding step will be completed by light-curing for 10 seconds.

Group C: Acid etching + bonding agent + sealant

Application of resin-based fissure sealant PROCEDURE

After completing the pretreatment steps for all groups, Grandio Seal (Voco GmbH, Germany) will be applied to the pits and fissures on the tooth surface and light-cured for 20 seconds. The procedure will be completed after checking the surface.

Group A: Acid etching + sealant; Group B: Acid etching + deproteinization + sealant; Group C: Acid etching + bonding agent + sealant

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 8 Years - 15 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Child (0-17)

You may qualify if:

• Healthy children aged 8-15 years.
• Fully erupted or completely impacted teeth that are clinically and radiographically confirmed to be caries-free or present with demineralized fissures scored as ICDAS 1-2.
• Children demonstrating cooperative behavior, with a Frankl Behavior Rating Scale score of 3 or 4.
• Oral Hygiene Index (OHI-S) score ≤ 3
• Written informed consent obtained from the parent or legal guardian.

You may not qualify if:

• Partially erupted second permanent molars
• Teeth presenting with severe hypoplasia, hypomineralization, extensive restorations, or cavitated carious lesions.
• History of systemic disease or long-term medication use.
• Known allergy to resin-based or glass ionomer materials.
• Presence of parafunctional habits.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Handan Vural: lead
• Inonu University: collaborator

Study Sites (1)

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University

Battalgazi, Malatya, 44200, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (2)

• Khare M, Suprabha BS, Shenoy R, Rao A. Evaluation of pit-and-fissure sealants placed with four different bonding protocols: a randomized clinical trial. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017 Nov;27(6):444-453. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12281. Epub 2016 Dec 26.

  PMID: 28024165 BACKGROUND

• Nair SM, Nene KS, Tirupathi S, Mathur AA, Khan HA, Godbole NM, Patil PP, Deolikar SA. Effect of Enamel Deproteinization Prior to Etching on the Clinical Performance of Resin-based Pit and Fissure Sealants: A Split-mouth Double-blinded Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2025 Feb;18(2):119-125. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3051. Epub 2025 Mar 20.

  PMID: 40417445 BACKGROUND

Study Officials

• handan vural, Assistant Professor

  Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Inonu University

  STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: PREVENTION
• Intervention Model: CROSSOVER
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Assistant Professor

Model Details: In this split-mouth design study, at least three fully erupted permanent molars from each participant will be included. The teeth will be randomly allocated into groups, and fissure sealants will be applied with the appropriate pretreatments according to the assigned group.

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: August 19, 2025
• First Posted: August 22, 2025
• Study Start: August 3, 2025
• Primary Completion (Estimated): February 1, 2027
• Study Completion (Estimated): May 1, 2027
• Last Updated: August 28, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will share
• Shared Documents: STUDY PROTOCOL, CSR
• Time Frame: Beginning 6 months and ending 1 years after the publication of results
• Access Criteria: Access to individual participant data (IPD) and supporting materials will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request. The following details apply: Who can access the data: Qualified academic researchers with a valid scientific purpose. What can be accessed: De-identified IPD, study protocol, statistical analysis plan, informed consent forms, and ethics approval documents. How to access: Interested researchers must submit a written request, including a brief research proposal and documentation of ethics committee approval. Requests should be sent to the corresponding author via email. Data sharing will be conducted in accordance with ethical guidelines and applicable data protection regulations.

Locations

TU (1)