Comparison of EXperts and IA-assisted Residents

NCT07133165 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: 25-5050
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 60
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Obstetric ultrasound is the cornerstone of fetal growth assessment. It provides essential biometric measurements for estimating fetal weight, monitoring growth and identifying conditions such as intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) or macrosomia. The accuracy of these measurements depends largely on the expertise of the operator. Experienced practitioners excel at positioning the probe, identifying anatomical landmarks and obtaining reproducible measurements. In contrast, novice operators, such as medical residents, may find it difficult to capture optimal images or identify precise landmarks, resulting in significant variability. This inter-observer variability, well documented even among experts, can have an impact on clinical decisions and obstetric management. For novices, variability is more pronounced, which can affect diagnostic reliability and patient care. Improving resident training is therefore essential to reduce this variability. Traditional solutions to minimizing variability, such as increased supervision, face limitations due to time constraints and resource availability. Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) could help in the training of residents. In obstetrics, AI could potentially automate biometric measurements by identifying key anatomical landmarks and performing precise, consistent measurements. These systems might standardize acquisition and reduce variability, making measurements less dependent on operator experience. AI technologies could significantly improve novice performance by potentially shortening the learning curve and enhancing measurement reliability. This might enable residents to work more independently while maintaining accuracy. Despite these potential advantages, few studies would have rigorously compared AI-assisted novice performance with that of expert practitioners under real-world conditions.This study aims to assess the possible effectiveness of AI in supporting novice operators during obstetric biometric measurements. The primary objective would be to determine whether AI assistance could enable novices to achieve measurement accuracy comparable to that of experienced practitioners, while potentially improving reproducibility and reducing inter-observer variability.

Conditions

Obstetric Ultrasound Biometric Measurements With or Without IA

Keywords

Ultrasound; Biometric measurements; Artificial intelligence; Obstetrics; Expert vs. novice

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Accuracy of biometric measurements: Assessment of agreement between manual and AI-assisted measurements.

  The parameters assessed will be biparietal diameter (BPD), head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL).Concordance will be determined by comparing the accuracy and reproducibility of the measurements, providing a better understanding of the reliability of AI-assisted biometric measurements.

  During the procedure

Study Arms (1)

Routine Follow-Up: Patients scheduled for a standard biometric ultrasound.

Maternal Age: Pregnant women aged between 18 and 45 years. Pregnancy Type: Singleton viable pregnancy (excluding twin or multiple gestations). Gestational Age: Between 17 weeks and 38 weeks of gestation.

Other: standard biometric ultrasound

Interventions

standard biometric ultrasound OTHER

In this study, biometric measurements were systematically performed for each patient using both manual methods and an artificial intelligence (AI) system (Live View Assist, Samsung). The AI system provided real-time guidance by identifying anatomical landmarks and assisting in the measurement of key biometric parameters, including Femur Length (FL), Abdominal Circumference (AC), Head Circumference (HC), and Biparietal Diameter (BPD). This dual approach ensured that both manual and AI-assisted methods were applied uniformly as part of routine clinical care.

Routine Follow-Up: Patients scheduled for a standard biometric ultrasound.

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 45 Years
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64)
• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Pregnant women

You may qualify if:

• Pregnant women aged between 18 and 40 years. Singleton or twin ongoing pregnancies. Gestational age between 20 and 36 weeks of amenorrhea (WA). Patients scheduled for a biometric ultrasound (standard follow-up).

You may not qualify if:

• Known major fetal anomalies that could affect biometric measurements. Technical difficulties during the ultrasound (e.g., maternal obesity, complex abdominal scars).
• History of severe maternal conditions affecting biometric measurements (e.g., uterine malformations)

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Hospices Civils de Lyon: lead

Study Sites (1)

Hospices Civils de Lyon, Maternité Croix Rousse

Lyon, France, 69004, France

Location

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: COHORT
• Time Perspective: RETROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: August 13, 2025
• First Posted: August 20, 2025
• Study Start: January 1, 2025
• Primary Completion: February 20, 2025
• Study Completion: March 1, 2025
• Last Updated: August 20, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Locations

FR (1)