NCT07133139

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to see if a body test called the NUN biomarker can track changes in chronic low back pain after dry needling and predict who will feel better. This study is for adults with chronic low back pain from muscle pain (Myofacial Pain). The main questions are:

  • Does the biomarker drop when pain improves?
  • Can it predict who benefits most?
  • Do higher starting levels mean better results with real dry needling? Investigators will compare real and fake (sham) dry needling using ultrasound, muscle pressure tests, and pain reports before and after treatment.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
16mo left

Started Oct 2025

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress31%
Oct 2025Aug 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 8, 2025

Completed
12 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 20, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 6, 2025

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 31, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 31, 2027

Last Updated

December 24, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.9 years

First QC Date

August 8, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 23, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Significant decrease in NUN biomarker levels in the dry needling treatment group compared to the sham (placebo) group.

    Relationships between changes in the biomarker and changes in the clinical condition

    1 week after treatment at the 2nd scan session

  • Correlations between changes in the biomarker and changes in the clinical assessment of myofascial pain: tender points, trigger points, and pressure algometry.

    relationships between changes in the biomarker and the quantitative measures on the structured clinical exam

    1 week after treatment at the 2nd exam session

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Average Pain Intensity

    3 days after treatment

  • Pain interference

    3 days after treatment

Study Arms (2)

Dry needling

ACTIVE COMPARATOR
Device: Dry NeedlingOther: NUN Biomarker

Sham Dry Needling

SHAM COMPARATOR
Device: Sham Dry NeedlingOther: NUN Biomarker

Interventions

The examiner will use the "repeated tapping" technique of Travel and Simmons in the active condition in the painful tender points and TPs. In the sham treatment, the needle tip retracts when pushed against the skin (like a ballpoint pen), and the subject feels a pointy object on their skin, which does not penetrate. Prior studies have shown that this is a credible placebo condition. Prior studies have also shown that one dry needling session is effective at least temporarily for 1-2 weeks, AND that US correlates of TPs improve as well

Dry needling

Half of the subjects will receive a sham needle instead which puts pressure on the skin but does not penetrate the skin (like a ballpoint pen with the tip retracted pushing on the skin). Since manual pressure over myofascial tender and trigger points is also an accepted treatment, the sham procedure could also be therapeutic, although we do not think it will be very effective.

Sham Dry Needling

A NUN biomarker measurement means checking the level of a certain substance (the "NUN" biomarker) in your body that can give investigators clues about your condition. Measuring the NUN biomarker helps investigators see if a treatment is working or if your condition is changing.

Dry needlingSham Dry Needling

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Ages 20-70;
  • Predominantly axial LBP (meeting NIH definition of cLBP with daily pain for at least 3 months) with a MP component as determined by the standardized examination for MP;
  • Average pain score of \> 3/10, with low back pain being the primary pain site;
  • CLBP meeting Quebec Task Force Classification System categories I-III (from axial pain only to pain radiating beyond the knee without neurological signs). Constant radicular pain associated with sensory loss is likely a confounder to dry needling treatment success;
  • NO HISTORY of receiving dry needling, to improve the effectiveness of the blind;
  • Demonstration of healthcare seeking at some point for LBP.

You may not qualify if:

  • Back surgery within the past six months;
  • Active workers' compensation or litigation claims, since these patients are more likely to have exaggerated pain behavior;
  • New pain treatments within 2 weeks of enrollment;
  • Any clinically unstable systemic illness or condition that is judged to interfere with the trial;
  • Non-ambulatory status;
  • Not able to complete the questionnaire
  • Currently pregnant or have intentions to become pregnant during the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kauffman Medical Building

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Facial Pain

Interventions

Dry Needling

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Complementary TherapiesTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy Modalities

Study Officials

  • Kang Kim, PhD

    University of Pittsburgh

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Ajay Wasan, MD, MSc

    University of Pittsburgh

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Ajay Wasan, MD, MSc

CONTACT

Kunal Lohana, MPH

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
BASIC SCIENCE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2025

First Posted

August 20, 2025

Study Start

October 6, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2027

Last Updated

December 24, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

A de-identified dataset can be shared with investigators upon request

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
Available after publication of the primary paper

Locations