NCT07129395

Brief Summary

Single center study to evaluate the feasibility of using 3 different strategies to measure adherence among children, adolescents, and young adults prescribed an anticoagulation medication

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for all trials

Timeline
4mo left

Started Jan 2023

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress89%
Jan 2023Oct 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 9, 2023

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 4, 2024

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 4, 2025

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 19, 2025

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 4, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

August 19, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

August 4, 2025

Last Update Submit

August 11, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Measure adherence via electronic adherence monitoring device (EAMD)

    Participants will be provided with a MEMS® Cap if they are prescribed an oral medication and a MEMS® Injectable if they are prescribed an injectable medication. Patients and families will then be trained by study nurse coordinator (NC) or principal investigator (PI) regarding how to use the MEMS® for medication administration throughout the study.

    12 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Rate barriers to adherence.

    12 weeks

  • Self-reported barriers to adherence.

    12 weeks

Eligibility Criteria

AgeUp to 29 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Pediatric, adolescents and young adults prescribed an anticoagulation medication.

You may qualify if:

  • Anticoagulated CCHMC patients ages 0 to 29.9 years and their caregivers (where applicable for patients \< 18 years)
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Duration of anticoagulation planned for the outpatient setting is 4 weeks or longer
  • Willing and able to participate in telephone and in person study visits
  • For patients \< 18 years, both patient and caregiver agree to participate

You may not qualify if:

  • Unwilling or unable to provide informed consent
  • Duration of anticoagulation is planned for \< 4 weeks in the outpatient setting
  • Anticoagulant drug will not fit into the EAMD
  • Unable to participate in telephone study visit

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229, United States

Location

Related Publications (22)

  • Andrew M, David M, Adams M, Ali K, Anderson R, Barnard D, Bernstein M, Brisson L, Cairney B, DeSai D, et al. Venous thromboembolic complications (VTE) in children: first analyses of the Canadian Registry of VTE. Blood. 1994 Mar 1;83(5):1251-7.

    PMID: 8118029BACKGROUND
  • Gibson BES, Chalmers EA et al. Thromboembolism in childhood: a prospective 2-year BPSU study in the United Kingdom. February 2001-February 2003. Br J Haematol. 2004;1:OC422

    BACKGROUND
  • van Ommen CH, Heijboer H, Buller HR, Hirasing RA, Heijmans HS, Peters M. Venous thromboembolism in childhood: a prospective two-year registry in The Netherlands. J Pediatr. 2001 Nov;139(5):676-81. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2001.118192.

    PMID: 11713446BACKGROUND
  • Raffini L, Huang YS, Witmer C, Feudtner C. Dramatic increase in venous thromboembolism in children's hospitals in the United States from 2001 to 2007. Pediatrics. 2009 Oct;124(4):1001-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0768. Epub 2009 Sep 7.

    PMID: 19736261BACKGROUND
  • Kerlin BA. Current and future management of pediatric venous thromboembolism. Am J Hematol. 2012 May;87 Suppl 1(0 1):S68-74. doi: 10.1002/ajh.23131. Epub 2012 Feb 24.

    PMID: 22367975BACKGROUND
  • Monagle P, Newall F. Management of thrombosis in children and neonates: practical use of anticoagulants in children. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2018 Nov 30;2018(1):399-404. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2018.1.399.

    PMID: 30504338BACKGROUND
  • Monagle P, Chan AKC, Goldenberg NA, Ichord RN, Journeycake JM, Nowak-Gottl U, Vesely SK. Antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):e737S-e801S. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2308.

    PMID: 22315277BACKGROUND
  • Luchtman-Jones L. Venous thromboembolism and anticoagulation safety: who is watching the children? Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2014 Nov;61(11):1916-7. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25145. Epub 2014 Jul 22. No abstract available.

    PMID: 25053292BACKGROUND
  • Jones S, McLoughlin S, Piovesan D, Savoia H, Monagle P, Newall F. Safety and Efficacy Outcomes of Home and Hospital Warfarin Management Within a Pediatric Anticoagulation Clinic. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2016 Apr;38(3):216-20. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000000502.

    PMID: 26808370BACKGROUND
  • Simons LE, Blount RL. Identifying barriers to medication adherence in adolescent transplant recipients. J Pediatr Psychol. 2007 Aug;32(7):831-44. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsm030. Epub 2007 May 23.

    PMID: 17522111BACKGROUND
  • Modi AC, Pai AL, Hommel KA, Hood KK, Cortina S, Hilliard ME, Guilfoyle SM, Gray WN, Drotar D. Pediatric self-management: a framework for research, practice, and policy. Pediatrics. 2012 Feb;129(2):e473-85. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1635. Epub 2012 Jan 4.

    PMID: 22218838BACKGROUND
  • Rapoff M. Adherence to pediatric medical regimens. 2nd ed. Issues in Clinical Child Psychology. New York, NY: Springer Science+Business Media; 2010

    BACKGROUND
  • Bhatia S, Landier W, Hageman L, Kim H, Chen Y, Crews KR, Evans WE, Bostrom B, Casillas J, Dickens DS, Maloney KW, Neglia JP, Ravindranath Y, Ritchey AK, Wong FL, Relling MV. 6MP adherence in a multiracial cohort of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children's Oncology Group study. Blood. 2014 Oct 9;124(15):2345-53. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-01-552166. Epub 2014 May 14.

    PMID: 24829202BACKGROUND
  • Wu YP, Stenehjem DD, Linder LA, Yu B, Parsons BG, Mooney R, Fluchel MN. Adherence to Oral Medications During Maintenance Therapy Among Children and Adolescents With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Medication Refill Analysis. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2018 Mar/Apr;35(2):86-93. doi: 10.1177/1043454217741877. Epub 2017 Nov 30.

    PMID: 29188741BACKGROUND
  • Quittner AL, Modi AC, Lemanek KL, Ievers-Landis CE, Rapoff MA. Evidence-based assessment of adherence to medical treatments in pediatric psychology. J Pediatr Psychol. 2008 Oct;33(9):916-36; discussion 937-8. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsm064. Epub 2007 Sep 10.

    PMID: 17846042BACKGROUND
  • Vrijens B, Antoniou S, Burnier M, de la Sierra A, Volpe M. Current Situation of Medication Adherence in Hypertension. Front Pharmacol. 2017 Mar 1;8:100. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00100. eCollection 2017.

    PMID: 28298894BACKGROUND
  • Riekert KA, Rand CS. Electronic monitoring of medication adherence: When is high-tech best? J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2002;9:25-34

    BACKGROUND
  • Chan AH, Harrison J, Black PN, Mitchell EA, Foster JM. Using electronic monitoring devices to measure inhaler adherence: a practical guide for clinicians. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 May-Jun;3(3):335-49.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2015.01.024. Epub 2015 Apr 1.

    PMID: 25840665BACKGROUND
  • McGrady ME, Holbein CE, Smith AW, Morrison CF, Hommel KA, Modi AC, Pai ALH, Ramsey RR. An Independent Evaluation of the Accuracy and Usability of Electronic Adherence Monitoring Devices. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Sep 18;169(6):419-422. doi: 10.7326/M17-3306. Epub 2018 May 22. No abstract available.

    PMID: 29800004BACKGROUND
  • McGrady ME, Ramsey RR. Using Electronic Monitoring Devices to Assess Medication Adherence: a Research Methods Framework. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Sep;35(9):2707-2714. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05905-z. Epub 2020 May 21.

    PMID: 32440997BACKGROUND
  • Nieuwlaat R, Wilczynski N, Navarro T, Hobson N, Jeffery R, Keepanasseril A, Agoritsas T, Mistry N, Iorio A, Jack S, Sivaramalingam B, Iserman E, Mustafa RA, Jedraszewski D, Cotoi C, Haynes RB. Interventions for enhancing medication adherence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 20;2014(11):CD000011. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000011.pub4.

    PMID: 25412402BACKGROUND
  • De Bleser L, De Geest S, Vandenbroeck S, Vanhaecke J, Dobbels F. How accurate are electronic monitoring devices? A laboratory study testing two devices to measure medication adherence. Sensors (Basel). 2010;10(3):1652-60. doi: 10.3390/s100301652. Epub 2010 Mar 2.

    PMID: 22294891BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Lori Luchtman-Jones, MD

    Region V-East Great Lake Region, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
RETROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 4, 2025

First Posted

August 19, 2025

Study Start

January 9, 2023

Primary Completion

October 4, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 4, 2026

Last Updated

August 19, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Locations