3M(TM) Filtek(TM) Supreme Flowable Composites for Class IV and Veneers
Clinical Evaluation of 3M(TM) Filtek(TM) Supreme Flowable Composites for Class IV and Veneers
1 other identifier
interventional
75
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This clinical study aims to evaluate the clinical performance of 3M™ Filtek™ Supreme Flowable Composite in class IV and veneer indication. Follow-ups of 7 days, 6, 12, and 24 months will be conducted following an Fédération Dentaire Internationale (FDI) modified score (2023). A minimum of 50 Class IV and 25 veneers will be included in the evaluation. Research data and pictures will be provided for each patient pre-op and at 7 days (baseline, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. Evaluation will be conducted by two calibrated evaluators different from the operator according to FDI clinical criteria.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 7, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 12, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 19, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2028
February 27, 2026
February 1, 2026
3.1 years
August 12, 2025
February 26, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Survival of treated site over 24 months
Primary site survival will be based off of an Modified FDI criteria score greater or equal to 4.
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Esthetic Properties evaluation
24 months
Functional Properties evaluation
24 months
Study Arms (2)
Class IV Restoration
EXPERIMENTAL3MTM FiltekTM Supreme Flowable Composites in class IV restoration
Veneers
EXPERIMENTAL3MTM FiltekTM Supreme Flowable Composites in veneers
Interventions
3M ™ Supreme Flowable Restorative contains BisGMA,TEGDMA and Procrylat resins. The fillers are a combination of ytterbium trifluoride filler with a range of particles sizes from 0.1 to 5.0 microns, a non-agglomerated/non-aggregated surface modified 20nm silica filler, a non-agglomerated/non/aggregated surface modified 75nm silica filler, and a surface modified aggregated zirconia/silica cluster filler (comprised of 20 nm silica and 4 to 11nm zirconia particles). The aggregate has an average cluster particle size of 0.6 to 10 microns. The inorganic filler loading is approximately 65% by weight (46% by volume). 3M (TM) Filtek(TM) Supreme Flowable Restorative is a modification of predicate device 3M(TM) Filtek(TM) XT Flowable Restorative (which was a modification of 3M(TM) Filtek(TM) Flow. 3M Filtek Supreme Flowable Composites are used per indication and its approved labeling in this study.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age between 18 -75 years old
- must be willing and able to provide informed consent to participate in the study
- must be available for the required post-operative follow-up study visits
- must be in good general health
- must be in good oral health hygiene (FMPS \< 20%)
- have at least 6 anterior maxillary teeth
- Central and lateral incisors with class IV or Veneer indications. Veneers will be performed exclusively with its contralateral teeth (pairs).
You may not qualify if:
- Single tooth veneers
- Canines
- Periodontal disease
- Pulpal diseases
- Occlusal dysfunctions (end-to-end bite)
- Lack of occlusal stability
- Missing posterior teeth, affecting the occlusal distribution
- Study tooth, adjacent tooth, or opposing tooth with mobility \> grade 2 using the Miller's tooth mobility index
- Systemic or local disorders that contra-indicate the dental procedures needed in this study
- Rampant, uncontrolled caries
- Heavy use of smoking tobacco (1 pack or equivalent a day) or chewing tobacco
- Evidence of xerostomia
- Evidence of severe bruxing or clenching, or in need of Temporomandibular Joint (TMJ) related therapy
- Known allergic reaction and/or sensitivity to research materials being used
- Condition or history of chronic use of anti-inflammatory, analgesic (pain), and/or mind altering drugs for medical (including psychiatric) and pharmacotherapeutic therapies that might alter the perception of pain
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
NYU College Of Dentistry
New York, New York, 10010, United States
Related Publications (22)
Ricci WA, Fahl N Jr. Nature-mimicking layering with composite resins through a bio-inspired analysis: 25 years of the polychromatic technique. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023 Jan;35(1):7-18. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13021. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
PMID: 36744374BACKGROUNDPontons-Melo JC, Atzeri G, Collares FM, Hirata R. Cosmetic recontouring for achieving anterior esthetics. Int J Esthet Dent. 2019;14(2):134-146.
PMID: 31061994BACKGROUNDDietschi D. Free-hand composite resin restorations: a key to anterior aesthetics. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1995 Sep;7(7):15-25; quiz 27.
PMID: 9002903BACKGROUNDVillarroel M, Fahl N, De Sousa AM, De Oliveira OB Jr. Direct esthetic restorations based on translucency and opacity of composite resins. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2011 Apr;23(2):73-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00392.x. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
PMID: 21477031BACKGROUNDHirata R, Kabbach W, de Andrade OS, Bonfante EA, Giannini M, Coelho PG. Bulk Fill Composites: An Anatomic Sculpting Technique. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015 Nov-Dec;27(6):335-43. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12159. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
PMID: 26177219BACKGROUNDCieplik F, Scholz KJ, Tabenski I, May S, Hiller KA, Schmalz G, Buchalla W, Federlin M. Flowable composites for restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: Results after five years. Dent Mater. 2017 Dec;33(12):e428-e437. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.09.012. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
PMID: 29102158BACKGROUNDZhang H, Wang L, Hua L, Guan R, Hou B. Randomized controlled clinical trial of a highly filled flowable composite in non-carious cervical lesions: 3-year results. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Oct;25(10):5955-5965. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-03901-z. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
PMID: 33797635BACKGROUNDEndo Hoshino IA, Fraga Briso AL, Bueno Esteves LM, Dos Santos PH, Meira Borghi Frascino S, Fagundes TC. Randomized prospective clinical trial of class II restorations using flowable bulk-fill resin composites: 4-year follow-up. Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Sep;26(9):5697-5710. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04526-6. Epub 2022 May 13.
PMID: 35556174BACKGROUNDRocha Gomes Torres C, Rego HM, Perote LC, Santos LF, Kamozaki MB, Gutierrez NC, Di Nicolo R, Borges AB. A split-mouth randomized clinical trial of conventional and heavy flowable composites in class II restorations. J Dent. 2014 Jul;42(7):793-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
PMID: 24769385BACKGROUNDCoachman C, De Arbeloa L, Mahn G, Sulaiman TA, Mahn E. An Improved Direct Injection Technique With Flowable Composites. A Digital Workflow Case Report. Oper Dent. 2020 May/Jun;45(3):235-242. doi: 10.2341/18-151-T. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
PMID: 32101498BACKGROUNDYpei Gia NR, Sampaio CS, Higashi C, Sakamoto A Jr, Hirata R. The injectable resin composite restorative technique: A case report. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Apr;33(3):404-414. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12650. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
PMID: 32918395BACKGROUNDImai A, Takamizawa T, Sugimura R, Tsujimoto A, Ishii R, Kawazu M, Saito T, Miyazaki M. Interrelation among the handling, mechanical, and wear properties of the newly developed flowable resin composites. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019 Jan;89:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.09.019. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
PMID: 30265868BACKGROUNDElkaffas AA, Alshehri A, Alqahtani AR, Abuelqomsan MA, Deeban YAM, Albaijan RS, Alanazi KK, Almudahi AF. Randomized Clinical Trial on Direct Composite and Indirect Ceramic Laminate Veneers in Multiple Diastema Closure Cases: Two-Year Follow-Up. Materials (Basel). 2024 Jul 16;17(14):3514. doi: 10.3390/ma17143514.
PMID: 39063806BACKGROUNDMeijering AC, Creugers NH, Roeters FJ, Mulder J. Survival of three types of veneer restorations in a clinical trial: a 2.5-year interim evaluation. J Dent. 1998 Sep;26(7):563-8. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(97)00032-8.
PMID: 9754744BACKGROUNDMazzetti T, Collares K, Rodolfo B, da Rosa Rodolpho PA, van de Sande FH, Cenci MS. 10-year practice-based evaluation of ceramic and direct composite veneers. Dent Mater. 2022 May;38(5):898-906. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2022.03.007. Epub 2022 Apr 1.
PMID: 35379471BACKGROUNDGresnigt MM, Kalk W, Ozcan M. Randomized controlled split-mouth clinical trial of direct laminate veneers with two micro-hybrid resin composites. J Dent. 2012 Sep;40(9):766-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.05.010. Epub 2012 Jun 2.
PMID: 22664565BACKGROUNDKorkut B, Ozcan M. Longevity of Direct Resin Composite Restorations in Maxillary Anterior Crown Fractures: A 4-year Clinical Evaluation. Oper Dent. 2022 Mar 1;47(2):138-148. doi: 10.2341/20-162-C.
PMID: 35604829BACKGROUNDDemirci M, Tuncer S, Sancakli HS, Tekce N, Baydemir C. Five-year Clinical Evaluation of a Nanofilled and a Nanohybrid Composite in Class IV Cavities. Oper Dent. 2018 May/Jun;43(3):261-271. doi: 10.2341/16-358-C. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
PMID: 29533716BACKGROUNDvan Dijken JW, Pallesen U. Fracture frequency and longevity of fractured resin composite, polyacid-modified resin composite, and resin-modified glass ionomer cement class IV restorations: an up to 14 years of follow-up. Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Apr;14(2):217-22. doi: 10.1007/s00784-009-0287-z. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
PMID: 19504133BACKGROUNDKorkut B, Turkmen C. Longevity of direct diastema closure and recontouring restorations with resin composites in maxillary anterior teeth: A 4-year clinical evaluation. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021 Jun;33(4):590-604. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12697. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
PMID: 33354867BACKGROUNDFrese C, Schiller P, Staehle HJ, Wolff D. Recontouring teeth and closing diastemas with direct composite buildups: a 5-year follow-up. J Dent. 2013 Nov;41(11):979-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.08.009. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
PMID: 23954577BACKGROUNDHickel R, Mesinger S, Opdam N, Loomans B, Frankenberger R, Cadenaro M, Burgess J, Peschke A, Heintze SD, Kuhnisch J. Revised FDI criteria for evaluating direct and indirect dental restorations-recommendations for its clinical use, interpretation, and reporting. Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Jun;27(6):2573-2592. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04814-1. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
PMID: 36504246BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kenneth L Allen, DDS
NYU College of Dentistry
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 12, 2025
First Posted
August 19, 2025
Study Start
August 7, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2028
Last Updated
February 27, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02