Effects of 20-week Mat-Pilates & Dual-Task Training on Strength, Balance, Cognition, and Fall Risk in Older Adults
Pilates&ST
Effects of a 20-week Combined Mat-Pilates Training With Dual Task Exercise for Improving Trunk Strength and Stability, Balance, Cognitive Function, and Risk of Falls in Older Adults.
2 other identifiers
interventional
67
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Our aims are to evaluate the impact of 24-week combined Pilates and dual-task exercises on physical fitness, balance, cognitive function, bone density in older adults. Participants ≥ 65 years of both genders will be randomly allocated to a control (n= 55) or intervention group (n= 55). Twice a week, sessions will take place in the FADEUP- UPORTO, with moderate intensity Pilates exercise and dual-task exercises. Trunk strength and stability, balance, cognitive function, and physical fitness will be accessed before and after the intervention. The Pilates method is easy to apply, low cost and widely accepted by older adults and it can integrate dual-task exercises easily. The researcher expected the intervention to improve balance, physical and cognitive skills of the participants, which may reduce the number of falls. The investigators seek to contribute with relevant information and enlighten the Dual Task-Pilates program as a safe strategy to reduce falls and maintain elderly's autonomy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 13, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2026
CompletedSeptember 8, 2025
May 1, 2025
3 months
August 5, 2025
September 1, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (9)
Balance- Biodex balance System SD
The Biodex Balance System SD plataform was used to assess balance through the Sensory Integration Test (CTSIB) and the Falls Risk Test. These assessments evaluate how the central nervous system processes sensory inputs (visual, and proprioceptive systems) to maintain postural control, helping to identify balance impairments and fall risk (Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, NY).
Baseline, post 20 weeks.
Stability of the trunk muscles- Stabilzer Pressure Biofeedback Unit
The study by Grooms et al. (2013) evaluated trunk muscle stability using the Stabilizer Pressure Biofeedback Unit, a device that measures the activation of deep abdominal muscles during exercises. It helps ensure proper engagement of core stabilizers, such as the transversus abdominis and multifidus, making it useful for both assessment and rehabilitation.
Baseline, post 20 weeks
Balance- Single-Leg Stance Test
The Single-Leg Stance Test is a simple and widely used method for assessing static postural balance. It involves standing on one leg, with eyes open, for up to 45 seconds. This test has been validated by Springer et al. (2007), who demonstrated its reliability in detecting balance deficits and fall risk, particularly in older adults and clinical populations.
Baseline, post 20 weeks.
Functional Fitness (Strength)- SFT
The Senior Fitness Test includes specific assessments for upper and lower body strength in older adults. Lower body strength is measured using the 30-second chair stand test, which evaluates leg strength and endurance. Upper body strength is assessed with the 30-second arm curl test, measuring arm muscle strength. These tests were validated by Rikli and Jones (1999) and are considered reliable indicators of functional fitness in elderly populations.
Baseline, 20 weeks.
Functional Fitness (Flexibility)- SFT
The Senior Fitness Test includes two flexibility assessments aimed at older adults: the Sit and Reach Test, which evaluates lower body flexibility, particularly of the hamstrings and lower back; and the Back Scratch Test, which assesses upper body flexibility, focusing on shoulder mobility. Both tests were validated by Rikli and Jones (1999) and are widely used to detect limitations in functional range of motion.
Beseline, post 20 weeks.
Cardiorespiratory endurance- SFT
The 6-Minute Walk Test is part of the Senior Fitness Test and evaluates cardiorespiratory endurance in older adults. Participants are instructed to walk as far as possible in six minutes along a 50-meter rectangular course. This test was validated by Rikli and Jones (1999) and is considered an excellent indicator of functional capacity for daily activities, such as climbing stairs or performing household tasks.
Baseline, post 20 weeks.
Dynamic balance and agility- 8-Foot Up-and-Go Test
The 8-Foot Up-and-Go Test is part of the Senior Fitness Test and assesses agility and dynamic balance in older adults. The participant must stand up from a chair, walk 2.44 meters (8 feet) quickly, turn around a cone, and return to the seat as fast as possible (Rikli and Jones, 1999).
Baseline, post 20 weeks.
Handgrip strength
Handgrip strength was assessed using the Jamar analog dynamometer (Sammons Preston Inc., Bolingbrook, Illinois, USA), a gold-standard instrument widely used to measure upper limb strength. The test is simple, quick, and provides a reliable indicator of overall functional strength. The Jamar dynamometer has well-established validity in clinical research.
Baseline, 20 weeks.
Trunk strength- Biodex System 4 Pro isokinetic dynamometer
Trunk strength was assessed using the Biodex System 4 Pro isokinetic dynamometer (Biodex Medical Systems, Shirley, NY, USA), a highly accurate device used to measure muscular torque and power at various speeds. It is widely used in clinical and research settings to analyze muscular performance in a standardized and safe manner.
Baseline, 20 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Cognitive function- MoCA
Baseline, 20 weeks.
Cognitive function- Trail Making Test
Baseline, 20 weeks.
Cognitive function- Stroop Color and Word Test
Baseline, 20 weeks.
General intelligence- Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS-III)
Baseline, 20 weeks
Cognitive function- Memory function
Baseline, 20 weeks.
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Habitual physical activityBaseline, 20 weeks.
Baseline, 20 weeks.
Study Arms (2)
Pilates
EXPERIMENTALdepois
Control Group
NO INTERVENTIONInterventions
This intervention combines Pilates with dual-task training over 20 weeks, featuring twice-weekly 60-minute sessions at moderate to vigorous intensity. It is uniquely grounded in methods from the Polestar and PhysicalMind schools and adapted for older adults (≥65 years), utilizing chairs, elastic bands, and minimal equipment. Unlike typical exercise programs, this protocol integrates cognitive tasks within Pilates exercises to simultaneously challenge physical and executive functions. Exercise intensity is individualized using heart rate monitors and the Borg scale. Assessments include trunk strength (Biodex System 4), balance (Biodex SD), and cognitive function (MoCA, Stroop, WAIS-III, TMT), making it one of the few trials to rigorously evaluate physical, cognitive, and dual-task performance outcomes in older adults. This approach is low-cost, scalable, and focused on fall prevention and autonomy maintenance.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Older adults (≥ 60 years)
- Both sexes
- Healthy (no diseases or diagnoses that prevent physical exercise)
- Community-dwelling
You may not qualify if:
- Individuals diagnosed with medical conditions for which physical activity is not recommended, including, but not limited to, musculoskeletal problems, cardiovascular diseases, and/or severe respiratory diseases.
- Participants with neurological diseases or disabling conditions that compromise balance.
- Individuals with moderate or severe cognitive impairment, according to established normative test values.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CIAFEL
Porto, Porto District, Portugal
Related Publications (7)
García-Vaquero, M. P., García-Manso, J. M., Pérez-López, J., Olcina, G., & Molinero, O. (2016). Reliability and learning effects of an isokinetic trunk extension-flexion protocol using the Biodex System 4. Clinical Biomechanics, 31, 627-630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.05.003
BACKGROUNDReitan, R. M. (1958). Validity of the Trail Making Test as an Indicator of Organic Brain Damage. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 8(3), 271-276. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1958.8.3.271 (Original work published 1958)
BACKGROUNDStroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18(6), 643-662. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054651
BACKGROUNDIntertester and intratester reliability of a dynamic balance protocol using the Biodex Stability System. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 7(2), 95-101. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.7.2.95
BACKGROUNDSpringer BA, Marin R, Cyhan T, Roberts H, Gill NW. Normative values for the unipedal stance test with eyes open and closed. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2007;30(1):8-15. doi: 10.1519/00139143-200704000-00003.
PMID: 19839175BACKGROUNDWechsler, D. (1997). WAIS-III: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Third Edition Manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
BACKGROUNDNasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I, Cummings JL, Chertkow H. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):695-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x.
PMID: 15817019BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Joana Carvalho, PhD
CIAFEL
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2025
First Posted
August 13, 2025
Study Start
August 1, 2025
Primary Completion
October 31, 2025
Study Completion
April 30, 2026
Last Updated
September 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data management will comply with applicable data protection legislation and the internal guidelines of the University of Porto. All project-specific documents, including collected data, will be stored with full privacy and confidentiality, with access restricted to the principal investigator and their advisors. The data will be destroyed after the objectives of the study are fulfilled or after five years, whichever comes first. All information obtained through questionnaires and direct observation will be anonymized before storage.