Subcrestal vs Juxtacrestal PRAMA Implants With Variable Necks
Subcrestal Placement of PRAMA Implants With Convergent Neck Incorporating Ultrathin Threaded Microsurface: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to understand how different implant neck designs and placement depths affect the surrounding bone and peri-implant tissue (the tissue around a dental implant) in adults who need implants in the back areas of the mouth (molars and premolars). The main questions it aims to answer are: Does placing implants deeper under the bone crest (subcrestally) help preserve more bone and peri-implant tissue over time? Do implants with longer, conical necks and micro-threaded surfaces result in more stable peri-implant tissue than implants with shorter necks? Researchers will compare three types of one-piece dental implants with different neck heights (short, standard, and long), placed at different depths in the jawbone, to determine which combination better maintains bone and peri-implant tissue levels. Participants will: Receive two dental implants in the posterior upper or lower jaw Be randomly assigned to one of three groups depending on implant neck design and placement depth Undergo implant surgery using a digital workflow, with healing over three months Be rehabilitated with custom zirconia bridges Return for regular clinical and imaging checkups over a period of at least 3 years This study aims to generate evidence that helps clinicians choose implant designs and techniques that promote long-term peri-implant tissue health.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2024
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 3, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 19, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 6, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2026
August 6, 2025
August 1, 2025
2.1 years
July 19, 2025
August 2, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Peri-Implant Bone Height Over Time
Vertical changes in marginal bone level from the implant-abutment junction to the first bone-to-implant contact (BIC) at mesial and distal aspects, measured on standardized periapical radiographs, CBCT, and digital scans. Unit of Measure: Millimeters (mm)
Baseline (prosthesis delivery), 6 months, and annually up to 3 years post-loading
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Volumetric Change in Peri-Implant Tissues
Baseline (prosthesis delivery), 6 months, and annually up to 3 years post-loading
Tissue Volume Difference by Crown Emergence Profile
6 months and annually up to 3 years post-loading
Probing Pocket Depth at Implant Sites
6 months and annually up to 3 years post-loading
Plaque Index at Implant Sites (0-3 scale)
6 months and annually up to 3 years
Bleeding on Probing at Implant Sites (percentage of sites)
6 months and annually up to 3 years
Study Arms (3)
Short Neck Implant - Crestal Placement
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm receive one-piece dental implants with a short transmucosal neck (1.8 mm total height, hyperbolic convergent shape) placed at the level of the bone crest (crestal placement). The implant features a ZirTi surface and Ultrathin Threaded Microsurface across the entire neck.
Standard Neck Implant (1 mm Subcrestal Placement)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm receive one-piece dental implants with a standard transmucosal neck (0.8 mm cylindrical plus 2.0 mm convergent portion) placed 1 mm below the bone crest. The implant surface includes micro-threads throughout the neck to promote tissue stability.
Long Neck Implant (2 mm Subcrestal Placement)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in this arm receive one-piece dental implants with a long transmucosal neck (0.8 mm cylindrical plus 3.0 mm convergent portion) placed 2 mm below the bone crest. This arm tests the effect of deeper placement combined with extended neck geometry.
Interventions
A one-piece endosseous dental implant with a 1.8 mm short convergent neck, placed at the bone crest. Implant used: PRAMA implant (Sweden \& Martina, Italy) with UTM surface treatment.
A one-piece endosseous dental implant with a standard-length neck (2.8 mm total; 0.8 mm cylindrical + 2 mm convergent), placed 1 mm subcrestally. Implant used: PRAMA implant (Sweden \& Martina, Italy) with UTM surface.
A one-piece endosseous dental implant with a long transmucosal neck (3.8 mm total; 0.8 mm cylindrical + 3 mm convergent), placed 2 mm subcrestally. Implant used: PRAMA implant (Sweden \& Martina, Italy) with UTM surface.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults aged 21 years or older.
- Presence of an edentulous area in the posterior maxilla or mandible (premolar or molar region) that allows the placement of two dental implants.
- Alveolar bone height sufficient to permit implant insertion with a minimum depth of 6 mm, and total implant length of at least 10 mm.
- Indication for implant-supported prosthetic restoration (2- or 3-unit fixed dental bridge).
- Good general health with no contraindications for oral surgical procedures.
- Not pregnant at the time of screening.
- Willingness and ability to sign written informed consent and comply with study procedures.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of uncontrolled systemic disease (e.g., diabetes, cardiovascular disorders, immunosuppression).
- History of chemotherapy or radiotherapy to the head or neck region.
- Heavy smokers (defined as \>10 cigarettes per day)
- Previous bone regeneration or grafting procedures at the target implant site.
- Use of medications known to interfere with bone metabolism (e.g., bisphosphonates, corticosteroids).
- Poor oral hygiene or active periodontal disease that may compromise implant success.
- Known allergy or hypersensitivity to implant materials used in the study-
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- ARDEC Academylead
Study Sites (1)
University of Medical Sciences of Havana
Havana, 10400, Cuba
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Allocation concealment is ensured via sealed opaque envelopes opened at the time of surgery. The surgeon is blinded to group assignment until after flap elevation, and the prosthetic team is unaware of crown design assignment until delivery. The outcomes assessor responsible for radiographic, CBCT, and 3D volumetric evaluations remains blinded to treatment allocation throughout the study.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 19, 2025
First Posted
August 6, 2025
Study Start
June 3, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2026
Last Updated
August 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to institutional policy and ethical considerations regarding patient confidentiality. Only aggregate-level results will be made publicly available through publications and study reports.