NCT07106138

Brief Summary

compare the effectiveness of several local anesthetic delivery systems in managing pain, anxiety, behavior, and vital signs among pediatric dental patients. A total of 112 children aged 6 to 10 years were included and randomly assigned to receive local anesthesia via one of the following methods: conventional syringe, computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system (Star Pen), needle-free injector (Comfort-In), or a vibrotactile device (Vibraject). Pain was assessed using the FLACC and Wong-Baker FACES scales, anxiety with the Venham Picture Test, and behavior with the Houpt scale. Vital signs including pulse and oxygen saturation were recorded during treatment. Additionally, satisfaction levels of both the patients and their parents were evaluated using structured questionnaires and Likert scales. The study seeks to determine which technique provides the most comfortable and effective experience for children undergoing dental procedures.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
112

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 23, 2024

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 29, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 10, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 22, 2025

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 6, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

August 11, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

July 22, 2025

Last Update Submit

August 5, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Local anesthetic delivery systemsComputer-controlled anesthesiaNeedle-free injectionVibrotactile DevicesDental anxietyPain management

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Pain level during dental anesthesia and treatment (behavioral assessment)

    Procedural pain was assessed using the FLACC scale, which evaluates five behavioral categories (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability), each scored from 0 to 2, for a total score range of 0-10. Higher scores indicate greater pain.Scores were assigned by trained observers during the procedure.

    From the start of local anesthetic injection until completion of pulpotomy, assessed up to 30 minutes.

  • Pain level during dental anesthesia and treatment (self-reported)

    Procedural pain was assessed using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale to measure children's self-reported pain, It's a self-reported scale with six cartoon faces representing increasing levels of pain, scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Children were asked to point to the face that best described their pain. Higher scores on either scale indicated greater pain intensity.

    From the start of local anesthetic injection until completion of pulpotomy, assessed up to 30 minutes.

  • Anxiety level during dental anesthesia and treatment

    Anxiety was measured using the Venham Picture Test (VPT),The test consists of eight pairs of cartoon images, each pair containing one figure showing a relaxed expression and one showing an anxious expression. Children were asked to choose the picture that best reflected how they felt. Scores ranged from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.

    From the start of local anesthetic injection until completion of pulpotomy, assessed up to 30 minutes.

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • Child behavior during dental procedures

    From the start of local anesthetic injection until completion of pulpotomy, assessed up to 30 minutes.

  • Heart rate

    From baseline measurement taken 5 minutes before local anesthetic injection, through the injection, and until completion of pulpotomy, assessed up to 35 minutes.

  • Oxygen saturation during dental procedures

    From baseline measurement taken 5 minutes before local anesthetic injection, through the injection, and until completion of pulpotomy, assessed up to 35 minutes.

  • Patient satisfaction with anesthesia technique

    Immediately after the procedure

  • Parental satisfaction with anesthesia technique

    Immediately after the procedure

Study Arms (4)

Conventional Syringe Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

28 Child received local anesthesia using a traditional dental syringe with standard technique.

Device: Conventional syringe injection

CCLAD - Star Pen Group

EXPERIMENTAL

28 Child received Local anesthesia using the Star Pen computer-controlled delivery system

Device: Star Pen

Comfort-In - Needle-Free Group

EXPERIMENTAL

28 Child received local anesthesia using the Comfort-In needle-free jet injector system.

Device: Comfort-In

Vibraject - Vibrotactile Device Group

EXPERIMENTAL

28 Child received Local anesthesia using a conventional syringe while applying the Vibraject vibrotactile stimulation device.

Device: Vibraject

Interventions

Manual injection using a conventional dental syringe and needle to deliver local anesthetic.

Conventional Syringe Group
Star PenDEVICE

A computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system designed to provide slow, controlled injection with improved comfort.

CCLAD - Star Pen Group

A needle-free injection system that delivers anesthetic through high-pressure jet injection, reducing injection-related discomfort.

Comfort-In - Needle-Free Group
VibrajectDEVICE

A vibrating attachment for dental syringes that provides vibrotactile stimulation during injection to distract from pain perception

Vibraject - Vibrotactile Device Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age6 Years - 10 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17)

You may qualify if:

  • Children aged 6-10 years.
  • Physically healthy with no neurological disorders or systemic diseases.
  • Children classified as positive" or "negative-positive" according to the modified Frankl Behavioral Rating Scale.
  • Not taking any sedatives or analgesics drugs

You may not qualify if:

  • Uncooperative children who exhibit clear behavioral problems.
  • Children with systemic diseases or disorders that may interfere with local anesthesia.
  • Use of any medications that may affect vital signs or pain response.
  • Presence of infection at the injection site.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Faculty Of Dentistry ,Tishreen University, lattakia, Syria

Latakia, Syria

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Agnosia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Perceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Abdul Wahab Nourallah, Prof

    Faculty of Dentistry, Tishreen University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Sara Badr, PHD student

    Faculty of Dentistry, Tishreen University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 22, 2025

First Posted

August 6, 2025

Study Start

April 23, 2024

Primary Completion

November 29, 2024

Study Completion

March 10, 2025

Last Updated

August 11, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations