Impact of Local Anesthesia Techniques on Children's Dental Treatment Experience
Comparing the Effectiveness of Several Local Anaesthesic Systems and Thier Effect on Pain Anxiety Behaviour and Vital Signs in Children
1 other identifier
interventional
112
1 country
1
Brief Summary
compare the effectiveness of several local anesthetic delivery systems in managing pain, anxiety, behavior, and vital signs among pediatric dental patients. A total of 112 children aged 6 to 10 years were included and randomly assigned to receive local anesthesia via one of the following methods: conventional syringe, computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system (Star Pen), needle-free injector (Comfort-In), or a vibrotactile device (Vibraject). Pain was assessed using the FLACC and Wong-Baker FACES scales, anxiety with the Venham Picture Test, and behavior with the Houpt scale. Vital signs including pulse and oxygen saturation were recorded during treatment. Additionally, satisfaction levels of both the patients and their parents were evaluated using structured questionnaires and Likert scales. The study seeks to determine which technique provides the most comfortable and effective experience for children undergoing dental procedures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 23, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 29, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 22, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 6, 2025
CompletedAugust 11, 2025
August 1, 2025
7 months
July 22, 2025
August 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Pain level during dental anesthesia and treatment (behavioral assessment)
Procedural pain was assessed using the FLACC scale, which evaluates five behavioral categories (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability), each scored from 0 to 2, for a total score range of 0-10. Higher scores indicate greater pain.Scores were assigned by trained observers during the procedure.
From the start of local anesthetic injection until completion of pulpotomy, assessed up to 30 minutes.
Pain level during dental anesthesia and treatment (self-reported)
Procedural pain was assessed using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale to measure children's self-reported pain, It's a self-reported scale with six cartoon faces representing increasing levels of pain, scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Children were asked to point to the face that best described their pain. Higher scores on either scale indicated greater pain intensity.
From the start of local anesthetic injection until completion of pulpotomy, assessed up to 30 minutes.
Anxiety level during dental anesthesia and treatment
Anxiety was measured using the Venham Picture Test (VPT),The test consists of eight pairs of cartoon images, each pair containing one figure showing a relaxed expression and one showing an anxious expression. Children were asked to choose the picture that best reflected how they felt. Scores ranged from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety.
From the start of local anesthetic injection until completion of pulpotomy, assessed up to 30 minutes.
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Child behavior during dental procedures
From the start of local anesthetic injection until completion of pulpotomy, assessed up to 30 minutes.
Heart rate
From baseline measurement taken 5 minutes before local anesthetic injection, through the injection, and until completion of pulpotomy, assessed up to 35 minutes.
Oxygen saturation during dental procedures
From baseline measurement taken 5 minutes before local anesthetic injection, through the injection, and until completion of pulpotomy, assessed up to 35 minutes.
Patient satisfaction with anesthesia technique
Immediately after the procedure
Parental satisfaction with anesthesia technique
Immediately after the procedure
Study Arms (4)
Conventional Syringe Group
ACTIVE COMPARATOR28 Child received local anesthesia using a traditional dental syringe with standard technique.
CCLAD - Star Pen Group
EXPERIMENTAL28 Child received Local anesthesia using the Star Pen computer-controlled delivery system
Comfort-In - Needle-Free Group
EXPERIMENTAL28 Child received local anesthesia using the Comfort-In needle-free jet injector system.
Vibraject - Vibrotactile Device Group
EXPERIMENTAL28 Child received Local anesthesia using a conventional syringe while applying the Vibraject vibrotactile stimulation device.
Interventions
Manual injection using a conventional dental syringe and needle to deliver local anesthetic.
A computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system designed to provide slow, controlled injection with improved comfort.
A needle-free injection system that delivers anesthetic through high-pressure jet injection, reducing injection-related discomfort.
A vibrating attachment for dental syringes that provides vibrotactile stimulation during injection to distract from pain perception
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Children aged 6-10 years.
- Physically healthy with no neurological disorders or systemic diseases.
- Children classified as positive" or "negative-positive" according to the modified Frankl Behavioral Rating Scale.
- Not taking any sedatives or analgesics drugs
You may not qualify if:
- Uncooperative children who exhibit clear behavioral problems.
- Children with systemic diseases or disorders that may interfere with local anesthesia.
- Use of any medications that may affect vital signs or pain response.
- Presence of infection at the injection site.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty Of Dentistry ,Tishreen University, lattakia, Syria
Latakia, Syria
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Abdul Wahab Nourallah, Prof
Faculty of Dentistry, Tishreen University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Sara Badr, PHD student
Faculty of Dentistry, Tishreen University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 22, 2025
First Posted
August 6, 2025
Study Start
April 23, 2024
Primary Completion
November 29, 2024
Study Completion
March 10, 2025
Last Updated
August 11, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share