The Effects of Static Versus Dynamic Exercises on Balance and Activity Balance Confidence In The Elderly Population With Locomotive Syndrome

NCT07104747 | Completed

• 1 other identifier: TUF/PB/33/1026/33
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 30
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

This research aimed to explore the comparative effects of static and dynamic balance training on postural stability and activity-specific balance confidence among elderly individuals diagnosed with locomotive syndrome. A single-blinded, randomized clinical trial was conducted at a shelter home, where thirty participants between the ages of 60 and 75 were randomly assigned to two intervention groups. One group received static balance exercises, while the other group engaged in dynamic balance training. Both interventions were delivered three times per week over a six-week period. Standardized assessment tools, including the Y-Balance Test and the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale, were used to evaluate outcomes related to balance and self- perceived confidence in performing daily activities. The study was designed to determine the more effective approach for enhancing mobility and promoting independence in the elderly population affected by locomotive syndrome.

Conditions

Locomotive Syndrome

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Y balance test

  Y Balance Test larger reach distances and higher symmetry between limbs reflect greater dynamic balance and functional capacity

  6 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

• Activity balance confidence

  6 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Static Exercise Intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants performed static balance exercises three times per week for six weeks, progressing in difficulty over time. In weeks 1-2, exercises were performed with support and included tandem standing, standing on a balance cushion, lunges with hand support, and one-leg stands. In weeks 3-4, the same exercises were done without support, and in weeks 5-6, they were performed with eyes closed to increase sensory challenge. Exercise duration progressed from 3 sets of 60 seconds to 5 sets of 90 seconds, and finally 7 sets of 120 seconds per movement.

Procedure: Static Exercise Intervention

Dynamic Exercise Intervention

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

This group engaged in dynamic balance exercises, also three times weekly for six weeks, with progressive complexity. Initial sessions (weeks 1-2) included walking with obstacles,tandem walking with support, small-step lunges, and supported step-ups.Weeks 3-4 incorporated cognitive elements and increased difficulty,while weeks 5-6 introduced sensory challenges like walking with eyes closed. Repetitions increased from 3sets of 60 seconds to 7 sets of 120 seconds, aligning with the progression in task complexity.

Procedure: (Dynamic Exercises Group

Interventions

Static Exercise Intervention PROCEDURE

Static exercises generally involve maintaining a fixed position without movement-such as standing on one leg or holding a specific posture-emphasizing isometric muscle control and stability.

Static Exercise Intervention

(Dynamic Exercises Group PROCEDURE

Dynamic exercises were structured across three progressive stages-basic, moderate, and advanced-each increasing in complexity and difficulty. These exercises were performed in various positions, including sitting, standing, and walking.

Dynamic Exercise Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 60 Years - 75 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Able to walk independently People with locomotive syndrome Can be able to perform exercise and listen to the therapist

You may not qualify if:

• Any mental illness Any systemic Illness

Sponsors & Collaborators

• University of Faisalabad: lead

Study Sites (1)

Dr Izza Ayub; PT

Faisalābad, Pakistan

Location

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Purpose: PREVENTION
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Dr

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: July 29, 2025
• First Posted: August 5, 2025
• Study Start: February 8, 2025
• Primary Completion: May 8, 2025
• Study Completion: May 28, 2025
• Last Updated: August 5, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

PA (1)