NCT07102433

Brief Summary

Children and young people (CYP) with life-limiting conditions represent a growing population with complex care needs that span health, education, and social care systems. These children often have multiple diagnoses, rely on medical technologies, and experience prolonged trajectories of illness. Despite this, care remains fragmented, services are poorly integrated, and definitions of "complexity" are variable, inconsistent, and inadequately reflect the lived experience of families and the perspectives of professionals. The CHESS (Complexity in Health, Education, and Social Support) study aims to develop a shared, evidence-informed understanding of "complexity" in the context of CYP with life-limiting conditions. The study will be delivered by a multi-disciplinary, multisectoral research team and is funded by a National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Programme Development Grant. This research will provide the foundational work to inform the design and implementation of a future NIHR Programme Grant focused on the development and testing of a child-centred, nationally applicable case mix classification system to support integrated multisector care and resource allocation. This qualitative study involves two stages. Stage 1 consists of semi-structured interviews with (i) CYP aged 5-17 years with a life-limiting condition, (ii) parents/carers (including bereaved parents and parents of children aged under 5 years), and (iii) professionals across healthcare, social care, and education sectors. These interviews aim to elicit stakeholder understandings of "complexity," how it is experienced and enacted in care, and the implications for service access, coordination, and outcomes. Stage 2 comprises a series of stakeholder workshops to review, refine, and synthesise findings from Stage 1 and a parallel realist review. Using consensus methods including the Nominal Group Technique, the workshops will co-develop a cross-sectoral conceptual definition of "complexity" and produce a logic model to guide integrated care delivery for this population. The CHESS study seeks to address a critical evidence gap in how complexity is understood, measured, and supported across systems. By incorporating the voices of children, families, and professionals across sectors, this study will generate new conceptual clarity, build a foundation for improved outcomes, and contribute directly to the national agenda on equity, quality, and integration in paediatric palliative and complex care.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
170

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
3mo left

Started Dec 2025

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

5 active sites

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress65%
Dec 2025Jul 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 28, 2025

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 3, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2025

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 31, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 31, 2026

Last Updated

November 14, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

July 28, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 13, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Medical complexityPediatric palliative careLife-limiting conditionsLife-threatening conditionsChildren and young people

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Study Objective

    Use findings from stakeholder interviews and workshops to develop a cross-sector evidence-based conceptual model of complexity to inform delivery and assessment of high quality and integrated care.

    Total Duration of study - August 2025 to July 2026.

  • Interviews - Research Question

    What does 'complexity' mean to stakeholders in relation to children with life-limiting conditions, with respect to their health, social care, and educational needs and how they are understood, planned, and delivered?

    Total study duration - August 2025 to July 2026

  • Workshops Research Questions

    1. How is 'complexity' defined and operationalised across health, social care, and education for children and young people with life-limiting conditions? 2. What components and processes are important for the delivery of integrated complex care? 3. What outputs and indicators signal 'complexity' and appropriate care delivery? 4. Which processes and outcomes are meaningful to evaluate?

    Total study duration - August 2025 to July 2026

Study Arms (1)

Interview and Workshop Participants

Interview and workshop participants will be formed from the following inclusion criteria: Children and Young People (CYP): * Aged 5-17 years * Diagnosed with a life-limiting condition (as defined by Together for Short Lives) Parents/Carers: * Parent/carer of a child aged 0-17 years with a life-limiting condition * Bereaved parent, where bereavement occurred ≥3 months ago Professionals (Health, Social Care, Education): * Working with CYP with life-limiting conditions for at least 6 months * Includes medical, nursing, allied health, social care, and educational professionals Workshop Participants: * Any of the above stakeholder types * Must be able to provide informed consent or assent

Other: Children and young people with life-limiting conditions, their parents/carers, and professionals across healthcare, education, and social care sectors.

Interventions

Children and young people with life-limiting conditions, their parents/carers, and professionals across healthcare, education, and social care sectors.

Interview and Workshop Participants

Eligibility Criteria

Age5 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The study population comprises: (1) children and young people aged 5-17 years with a life-limiting condition; (2) parents or carers of children aged 0-17, including bereaved parents (≥3 months post-bereavement); and (3) professionals from health, education, and social care with ≥6 months' experience supporting this population. Participants will be recruited from five NHS and hospice sites across England, selected for variation in geography, population served, and service model. Purposive sampling will be used to ensure diversity in age, diagnosis, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and care setting. Professionals will be drawn from a range of disciplines across sectors using our professional networks.

You may qualify if:

  • Children (5-17 years) with any life-limiting condition defined using the UK Together for Short Lives widely adopted 4 categories of life-limiting/life-threatening conditions among children.
  • Parents/carers of children (0-17 years old) with a life-limiting conditions.
  • Bereaved parents of a child who had a life-limiting condition (at least 3 months since bereavement).
  • Healthcare professionals (medicine, nursing, allied health professionals), social care providers, education teaching and therapy staff with \> 6 months experience of caring for children with life-limiting conditions.

You may not qualify if:

  • Children unable to communicate via an interview, using 'draw and talk' or play methods, Talking MatsTM, or via their parents.
  • Children that speak languages not supported by NHS translation services.
  • Any child or young person for whom the PI believes participation in the study may induce undue psychological distress.
  • Parents/carers are unable to provide consent/assent to participate in interviews.
  • Parents/carers that speak languages not supported by NHS translation services.
  • Parents who are recently bereaved (\<3 months).
  • Any parent/carer for whom the PI believes participation in the study may induce undue psychological distress (e.g. parents of children who may be receiving end-of-life care).
  • Professionals with \<6 months experience of caring for children with life-limiting conditions.
  • Stage 2 - Workshops
  • Parents or carers of children with a life-limiting condition (0-17 years old).
  • Bereaved parents of a child who had a life-limiting condition (at least 3 months since bereavement).
  • Researchers working with or in the field of complexity in children with life-limiting conditions.
  • Professionals across child health, social care, and education with experience of working with children with life-limiting conditions for \>6 months.
  • Professionals across child health, social care, and education with \<6 months of experience working with children with life-limiting conditions.
  • Parents, carers, or professionals that are unable to provide consent or assent.
  • +2 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Birmingham Children's Hospital

Birmingham, B46NH, United Kingdom

Location

Chailey Clinical Services, Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust

Chailey, BN84JN, United Kingdom

Location

Shooting Star Children's Hospices

Hampton, TW12 3RA, United Kingdom

Location

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust

London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom

Location

Royal Marsden Hospital

London, SW36JJ, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (34)

  • Rahimzadeh V, Bartlett G, Longo C, Crimi L, Macdonald ME, Jabado N, Ells C. Promoting an ethic of engagement in pediatric palliative care research. BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Oct 16;14:50. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0048-5.

    PMID: 26474573BACKGROUND
  • Low, J. (2019). A pragmatic definition of the concept of theoretical saturation. Sociological Focus 52(2), 131-139.

    BACKGROUND
  • Fields D, Fraser LK, Taylor J, Hackett J. What does 'good' palliative care look like for children and young people? A qualitative study of parents' experiences and perspectives. Palliat Med. 2023 Mar;37(3):355-371. doi: 10.1177/02692163231154300. Epub 2023 Feb 24.

    PMID: 36825577BACKGROUND
  • Fisher V, Atkin K, Fraser LK. The health of mothers of children with a life-limiting condition: A qualitative interview study. Palliat Med. 2022 Oct;36(9):1418-1425. doi: 10.1177/02692163221122325. Epub 2022 Sep 14.

    PMID: 36113084BACKGROUND
  • Namisango E, Bristowe K, Murtagh FE, Downing J, Powell RA, Abas M, Lohfeld L, Ali Z, Atieno M, Haufiku D, Guma S, Luyirika EB, Mwangi-Powell FN, Higginson IJ, Harding R. Towards person-centred quality care for children with life-limiting and life-threatening illness: Self-reported symptoms, concerns and priority outcomes from a multi-country qualitative study. Palliat Med. 2020 Mar;34(3):319-335. doi: 10.1177/0269216319900137. Epub 2020 Feb 21.

    PMID: 32081084BACKGROUND
  • Coombes LH, Wiseman T, Lucas G, Sangha A, Murtagh FE. Health-related quality-of-life outcome measures in paediatric palliative care: A systematic review of psychometric properties and feasibility of use. Palliat Med. 2016 Dec;30(10):935-949. doi: 10.1177/0269216316649155. Epub 2016 May 31.

    PMID: 27247087BACKGROUND
  • Coombes L, Harethardottir D, Braybrook D, Roach A, Scott H, Bristowe K, Ellis-Smith C, Downing J, Bluebond-Langner M, Fraser LK, Murtagh FEM, Harding R. Design and Administration of Patient-Centred Outcome Measures: The Perspectives of Children and Young People with Life-Limiting or Life-Threatening Conditions and Their Family Members. Patient. 2023 Sep;16(5):473-483. doi: 10.1007/s40271-023-00627-w. Epub 2023 May 23.

    PMID: 37221441BACKGROUND
  • Scott HM, Coombes L, Braybrook D, Roach A, Harethardottir D, Bristowe K, Ellis-Smith C, Downing J, Murtagh FE, Farsides B, Fraser LK, Bluebond-Langner M, Harding R. Spiritual, religious, and existential concerns of children and young people with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions: A qualitative interview study. Palliat Med. 2023 Jun;37(6):856-865. doi: 10.1177/02692163231165101. Epub 2023 Mar 28.

    PMID: 36978266BACKGROUND
  • Coombes L, Braybrook D, Roach A, Scott H, Harethardottir D, Bristowe K, Ellis-Smith C, Bluebond-Langner M, Fraser LK, Downing J, Farsides B, Murtagh FEM, Harding R; C-POS. Achieving child-centred care for children and young people with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions-a qualitative interview study. Eur J Pediatr. 2022 Oct;181(10):3739-3752. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04566-w. Epub 2022 Aug 12.

    PMID: 35953678BACKGROUND
  • McLorie EV, Hackett J, Fraser LK. Understanding parents' experiences of care for children with medical complexity in England: a qualitative study. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2023 Aug;7(1):e002057. doi: 10.1136/bmjpo-2023-002057.

    PMID: 37550084BACKGROUND
  • Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

    PMID: 17872937BACKGROUND
  • Roach A, Braybrook D, Marshall S. Reflective insights from developing a palliative care children and young people's advisory group. Palliat Med. 2021 Mar;35(3):621-624. doi: 10.1177/0269216320976035. Epub 2021 Jan 12.

    PMID: 33435853BACKGROUND
  • Coghlan, A.T., Preskill, H., and Tzavaras Catsambas, T. (2003). An overview of appreciative inquiry in evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation 2003(100), 5-22.

    BACKGROUND
  • Cohen E, Bruce-Barrett C, Kingsnorth S, Keilty K, Cooper A, Daub S. Integrated complex care model: lessons learned from inter-organizational partnership. Healthc Q. 2011;14 Spec No 3:64-70. doi: 10.12927/hcq.0000.22580.

    PMID: 22008576BACKGROUND
  • Kaushik, V., and Walsh, C.A. (2019). Pragmatism as a research paradigm and its implications for social work research. Social Sciences 8(9), 255.

    BACKGROUND
  • Bedendo A, Hinde S, Beresford B, Papworth A, Phillips B, Vasudevan C, McLorie E, Walker G, Peat G, Weatherly H, Feltbower R, Hewitt C, Haynes A, Murtagh F, Noyes J, Hackett J, Hain R, Oddie S, Subramanian G, Fraser L. Consultant-led UK paediatric palliative care services: professional configuration, services, funding. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2023 Aug 9:spcare-2023-004172. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2023-004172. Online ahead of print.

    PMID: 37558392BACKGROUND
  • Coombes L, Bristowe K, Ellis-Smith C, Aworinde J, Fraser LK, Downing J, Bluebond-Langner M, Chambers L, Murtagh FEM, Harding R. Enhancing validity, reliability and participation in self-reported health outcome measurement for children and young people: a systematic review of recall period, response scale format, and administration modality. Qual Life Res. 2021 Jul;30(7):1803-1832. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02814-4. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

    PMID: 33738710BACKGROUND
  • Coombes L, Harethardottir D, Braybrook D, Scott HM, Bristowe K, Ellis-Smith C, Fraser LK, Downing J, Bluebond-Langner M, Murtagh FE, Harding R. Achieving consensus on priority items for paediatric palliative care outcome measurement: Results from a modified Delphi survey, engagement with a children's research involvement group and expert item generation. Palliat Med. 2023 Dec;37(10):1509-1519. doi: 10.1177/02692163231205126. Epub 2023 Oct 18.

    PMID: 37853579BACKGROUND
  • Murtagh FEM, Guo P, Firth A, Yip KM, Ramsenthaler C, Douiri A, Pinto C, Pask S, Dzingina M, Davies JM, O'Brien S, Edwards B, Groeneveld EI, Hocaoglu M, Bausewein C, Higginson IJ. A casemix classification for those receiving specialist palliative care during their last year of life across England: the C-CHANGE research programme. Southampton (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Research; 2023 Nov. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK597740/

    PMID: 38048413BACKGROUND
  • Pask S, Pinto C, Bristowe K, van Vliet L, Nicholson C, Evans CJ, George R, Bailey K, Davies JM, Guo P, Daveson BA, Higginson IJ, Murtagh FEM. A framework for complexity in palliative care: A qualitative study with patients, family carers and professionals. Palliat Med. 2018 Jun;32(6):1078-1090. doi: 10.1177/0269216318757622. Epub 2018 Feb 19. No abstract available.

    PMID: 29457743BACKGROUND
  • Cassidy L, Quirke MB, Alexander D, Greene J, Hill K, Connolly M, Brenner M. Integrated care for children living with complex care needs: an evolutionary concept analysis. Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Apr;182(4):1517-1532. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-04851-2. Epub 2023 Feb 13.

    PMID: 36780041BACKGROUND
  • Hain R, Devins M, Hastings R, Noyes J. Paediatric palliative care: development and pilot study of a 'Directory' of life-limiting conditions. BMC Palliat Care. 2013 Dec 11;12(1):43. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-12-43.

    PMID: 24330676BACKGROUND
  • Horridge KA, Harvey C, McGarry K, Williams J, Whitlingum G, Busk M, Fox S, Baird G, Spencer A. Quantifying multifaceted needs captured at the point of care. Development of a Disabilities Terminology Set and Disabilities Complexity Scale. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016 Jun;58(6):570-80. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13102. Epub 2016 Mar 23.

    PMID: 27009933BACKGROUND
  • Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. (2021). Our vision for the future of paediatrics in the UK: Executive Summary. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health

    BACKGROUND
  • Cohen E, Kuo DZ, Agrawal R, Berry JG, Bhagat SK, Simon TD, Srivastava R. Children with medical complexity: an emerging population for clinical and research initiatives. Pediatrics. 2011 Mar;127(3):529-38. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0910. Epub 2011 Feb 21.

    PMID: 21339266BACKGROUND
  • Jemal, J., and Kenley, A. (2023). Wasting Money, Wasting potential - the costs of SEND tribunals. Pro Bono Economics

    BACKGROUND
  • Ahmedzai SH. Legal right to palliative care wouldn't be needed if the hospice movement didn't operate outside the NHS. BMJ. 2022 Jun 16;377:o1422. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o1422. No abstract available.

    PMID: 35710112BACKGROUND
  • Fisher V, Atkin K, Ewing G, Grande G, Fraser LK. Assessing the suitability of the Carer Support Needs Assessment Tool (CSNAT-Paediatric) for use with parents of children with a life-limiting condition: A qualitative secondary analysis. Palliat Med. 2024 Jan;38(1):100-109. doi: 10.1177/02692163231214471. Epub 2023 Dec 23.

    PMID: 38142279BACKGROUND
  • Pinney, A. (2017). Understanding the needs of disabled children with complex needs or life-limiting conditions: What can we learn from national data? Council for disabled children, The True Colours Trust

    BACKGROUND
  • Page BF, Hinton L, Harrop E, Vincent C. The challenges of caring for children who require complex medical care at home: 'The go between for everyone is the parent and as the parent that's an awful lot of responsibility'. Health Expect. 2020 Oct;23(5):1144-1154. doi: 10.1111/hex.13092. Epub 2020 Jun 16.

    PMID: 32542954BACKGROUND
  • Fraser LK, Parslow R. Children with life-limiting conditions in paediatric intensive care units: a national cohort, data linkage study. Arch Dis Child. 2018 Jun;103(6):540-547. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-312638. Epub 2017 Jul 13.

    PMID: 28705790BACKGROUND
  • Fraser LK, Gibson-Smith D, Jarvis S, Norman P, Parslow RC. Estimating the current and future prevalence of life-limiting conditions in children in England. Palliat Med. 2021 Oct;35(9):1641-1651. doi: 10.1177/0269216320975308. Epub 2020 Dec 15.

    PMID: 33323043BACKGROUND
  • Fraser LK, Miller M, Hain R, Norman P, Aldridge J, McKinney PA, Parslow RC. Rising national prevalence of life-limiting conditions in children in England. Pediatrics. 2012 Apr;129(4):e923-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-2846. Epub 2012 Mar 12.

    PMID: 22412035BACKGROUND
  • Chambers, L. (2018). A Guide to Children's Palliative Care: Supporting babies, children and young people with life-limiting and life-threatening conditions and their families. Together for Short Lives

    BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Interventions

CaregiversEducational Status

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Health PersonnelHealth Care Facilities Workforce and ServicesSocioeconomic FactorsPopulation Characteristics

Study Officials

  • Fliss Murtagh

    Hull York Medical School

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Mary Baginsky

    King's College London

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Diane Sellers

    Chailey Clinical Services, Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Lucy Coombes

    Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Mary Salama

    Birmingham Children's Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Bobbie Farsides

    Brighton and Sussex Medical School

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Gabriella L Walker

    Patient and Public Representative

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Pru Holder

    King's College London

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Abinaya Chandrasekar

    King's College London

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Richard Harding, PhD

CONTACT

Lorna Fraser, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
OTHER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 28, 2025

First Posted

August 3, 2025

Study Start

December 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2026

Last Updated

November 14, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

This is a qualitative study involving in-depth interviews and stakeholder workshops with children, parents (including bereaved parents), and professionals. Due to the nature of the data collected-highly personal, context-specific, and potentially identifiable-even after de-identification, individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared publicly. This decision is guided by ethical considerations, the sensitivity of participant narratives, and the need to preserve confidentiality in accordance with informed consent agreements and data governance policies. Summarised findings will be shared through academic publications, public reports, and stakeholder events.

Locations