Hall Technique vs Conventional Technique in Permanent Teeth

NCT07100028 | Not Yet Recruiting

• 1 other identifier: Hall technique-permanent
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 96
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiological performance of stainless steel crowns using conventional and Hall technique on permanent molars

Conditions

Dental Caries; Crowned Posterior Teeth

Keywords

hall technique; permanent teeth; crown

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Clinical and radiological performance of SSCs placed with Hall of conventional technique

  The primary outcome 'success' was defined as the "absence of major failure," a measure encompassing clinical and radiographic signs of irreversible pulpitis or infectious complications (spontaneous pain, pulp infection, or periradicular pathology, loss of lamina dura on radiographs).

  2 years

Secondary Outcomes (1)

• Clinical measurements of SSCs placed with Hall of conventional technique

  2 years

Study Arms (2)

SSC crown with conventional technique

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

SSC crown placement using conventional technique

Other: SSC crown with Hall technique

SSC crown with Hall technique

EXPERIMENTAL

SSC crown placement using Hall technique

Other: SSC with conventional technique

Interventions

SSC crown with Hall technique OTHER

SSC crown placement using Hall technique

SSC crown with conventional technique

SSC with conventional technique OTHER

SSC placement using conventional technique

SSC crown with Hall technique

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 6 Years - 13 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Child (0-17)

You may qualify if:

• The child volunteers and their parents who read and agreed to the informed consent form.
• The presence of excessive loss of material or extensive enamel defects in at least two permanent molars that require crown application.
• The presence of antagonist teeth of the teeth to be crowned.
• All treatments on the patient's other teeth have been completed.
• The patient who does not have temporomandibular joint (TMJ) problems.
• Children who have cooperation to allow the dental procedure to be completed.

You may not qualify if:

• Child volunteers or parents who refuse to participate in the study.
• The patient who has a chronic disease.
• Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment
• The patient has missing teeth on the treated side.
• The need for vital or non-vital pulp treatment of the tooth.
• The child volunteers and their parents did not accept the aesthetic appearance of the stainless steel crown.

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Hacettepe University: lead

Study Sites (1)

Hacettepe university, pediatric dentistry

Ankara, Altindag, 06100, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Dental Caries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tooth Demineralization; Tooth Diseases; Stomatognathic Diseases

Study Officials

• zafer cavit cehreli, prof.dr.

  STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

gizem erbas unverdi, Dr.

CONTACT

00905052805736; erbasgizem@gmail.com

sule sahin, research assistant

CONTACT

sahinsule02@gmail.com

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: NONE
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: CROSSOVER
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Assistant prof

Model Details: Two technique on two molars in one patient

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: June 25, 2025
• First Posted: August 1, 2025
• Study Start: September 7, 2025
• Primary Completion (Estimated): December 30, 2027
• Study Completion (Estimated): June 30, 2028
• Last Updated: August 1, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will share
• Shared Documents: STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
• Time Frame: Starting 6 months after publication
• Access Criteria: IPD is available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Locations

TU (1)