NCT07097129

Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to demonstrate the effects of pressure-controlled mask ventilation and non-mask ventilation during anaesthesia induction on gastric insufflation, gastric dilatation, increased bowel movements and bowel distension and to demonstrate its effect on surgical vision in robotic colorectal surgeries. The main questions it aims to answer are: How will non-mask ventilation during anaesthesia induction effect surgical vision in robotic colorectal surgeries compared to mask ventilation? How will non-mask ventilation during anaesthesia induction effect gastric dilatation and bowel movements in robotic colorectal surgeries compared to mask ventilation? If there is a comparison group: Researchers will compare mask ventilation and non-mask ventilation during anaesthesia induction to see if the surgical vision, gastric dilatation and bowel movements are effected. Participants will be divided in two groups: No mask ventilation group: Outside of spontaneous breathing during preoxygenation, orotracheal intubation will be performed at the 60th second after anesthesia induction without ventilation, using video laryngoscopy. Mask ventilation group: After anesthesia induction, mask ventilation will be performed with a respiratory rate of 10 and 15 cmH2O pressure, followed by orotracheal intubation using video laryngoscopy at the 60th second. Researchers will compare the results between the groups to see the surgical vision, gastric dilatation and bowel movements. The hypothesis of this study is that non-mask ventilation will provide better surgical vision, less gastric dilatation and less bowel movements in robotic colorectal surgeries.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 28, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 31, 2025

Completed
1 day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 10, 2025

Completed
10 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 20, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

April 30, 2026

Status Verified

April 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

March 28, 2025

Last Update Submit

April 25, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

robotic colorectal surgerygastric dilationbowel distentionsurgical view

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Surgical Vision

    Likert scale Surgical field visibility is very poor: 1 point Surgical field visibility is poor: 2 points Surgical field visibility is moderate: 3 points Surgical field visibility is good: 4 points Surgical field visibility is very good: 5 points Higher scores on this scale mean a better outcome.

    5 minutes after the end of the surgical procedure

  • Gastric Dilatation

    Likert Scale Gastric dilatation was severe enough to complicate the surgical technique: 1 point Gastric dilatation was present but did not complicate the surgery: 2 points Stomach was not dilated: 3 points Higher scores on this scale mean a better outcome.

    5 minutes after the end of the surgical procedure

  • Bowel distension

    Likert Scale Bowel distension is quite significant: 1 point Bowel distension is significant: 2 points Bowel distension is moderate: 3 points Bowel distension is mild: 4 points No bowel distension: 5 points Higher scores on this scale mean a better outcome.

    5 minutes after the end of the surgical procedure

  • Bowel movement

    Likert Scale Bowel movements are quite frequent: 1 point Bowel movements are frequent: 2 points Bowel movements are moderate: 3 points Bowel movements are mild: 4 points No bowel movements: 5 points Higher scores on this scale mean a better outcome.

    5 minutes after the end of the surgical procedure

Study Arms (2)

No Mask Ventilation

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

2 mcg/kg fentanyl, 1 - 2 mg/kg propofol, 1 mg/kg rocuronium will be administered for anaesthesia induction. Orotracheal intubation will be performed at 60 seconds with video laryngoscopy without ventilation other than spontaneous breathing.

Procedure: Mask Ventilation

Mask Ventilation

NO INTERVENTION

2 mcg/kg fentanyl, 1 - 2 mg/kg propofol, 1 mg/kg rocuronium will be administered for anaesthesia induction. Mask ventilation will be performed with mechanical ventilator set to pressure controlled ventilation, 15 cmH20 peak pressure, 10 respiratory rates per minute. Orotracheal intubation will be performed at the 60th second with video laryngoscopy.

Interventions

Mask ventilation with mechanical ventilator set to pressure controlled ventilation, 15 cmH20 peak pressure, 10 respiratory rates per minute

No Mask Ventilation

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients between the ages of 18 and 80 who are scheduled to undergo robotic colorectal surgery will be included in the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with preoperative prediction of possible difficult intubation
  • Presence of restrictive/obstructive lung disease requiring CPAP application for treatment in preoperative anaesthesia evaluation
  • Patients with cardiovascular diseases (EF \< 20%, advanced aortic stenosis, decompensated heart failure) that require change of at least one of the drugs to be used for anaesthesia induction
  • Presence of allergy to any of the drugs to be used in anaesthesia induction and maintenance

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Koç University Hospital

Istanbul, Zeytinburnu, 34010, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Jung YK, Kim CL, Jeong MA, Sung JM, Lee KG, Kim NY, Kang L, Lim H. Gastric insufflation and surgical view according to mask ventilation method for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Sep 20;23(1):321. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02269-9.

    PMID: 37730575BACKGROUND
  • Bouvet L, Albert ML, Augris C, Boselli E, Ecochard R, Rabilloud M, Chassard D, Allaouchiche B. Real-time detection of gastric insufflation related to facemask pressure-controlled ventilation using ultrasonography of the antrum and epigastric auscultation in nonparalyzed patients: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Anesthesiology. 2014 Feb;120(2):326-34. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000094.

    PMID: 24317204BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Gastric Dilatation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Stomach DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The surgical team, who is blinded to the anaesthesia induction groups, will mark the Likert scale prepared for the presence of gastric distension, presence of intestinal distension, status of bowel movements and surgical vision regarding the intraoperative process.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 28, 2025

First Posted

July 31, 2025

Study Start

August 1, 2025

Primary Completion

October 10, 2025

Study Completion

October 20, 2025

Last Updated

April 30, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share
Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Starting from 6 months after publication for 5 years
Access Criteria
No access criteria

Locations