NCT07096310

Brief Summary

The aim of this work is to evaluate the efficacy associated with Meropenem(example of carbapenems) as initial therapy for sepsis in burn patients compared with Pipracillin/Tazobactam (example of non carbapenem beta lactam antibiotics).

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
400

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_1 sepsis

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2024

Typical duration for phase_1 sepsis

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2024

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 4, 2025

Completed
27 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 31, 2025

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 15, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

October 3, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2 years

First QC Date

July 4, 2025

Last Update Submit

September 30, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

MeronemTazocinsepsisBurn

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The primary outcome is to evaluate survival rate associated with carbapenems as initial therapy for sepsis in burn patients compared with non carbapenem antibiotics by comparing SOFA score between two groups.

    The primary outcome of this work is to evaluate rate of survival associated with carbapenems as initial therapy for sepsis in burn patients compared with non carbapenem antibiotics by measuring SOFA score at day 4 and day 7 of starting of treatment.

    2 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Occurrence rate of enterocolitis due to Clostridium difficile. (rate of patients with diarrhea and stool culture shows Clostridium difficile in each group).

    2 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Meronem group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Meronem group will receive Meronem 2 gm Iv infusion over 3 hours every 8 hours per day

Drug: Meropenem I.V. 2g as a 3 hour infusion every 8 hours

Tazocin group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Tazocin group will receive non Carbapenems (Tazocin) 4.5 gm IV slow infusion over 20 minutes every 8 hours per day

Drug: Tazocin (pipercillin/tazobactam)

Interventions

Non C group will receive non Carbapenems (Tazocin) 4.5 gm IV slow infusion over 20 minutes every 8 hours per day

Also known as: Meronem
Meronem group

Non C group will receive non Carbapenems (Tazocin) 4.5 gm IV slow infusion over 20 minutes every 8 hours per day

Also known as: Zocin
Tazocin group

Eligibility Criteria

Age21 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Burned patients admitted to Burn Unit of Ain Shams university hospitals diagnosed with sepsis, not transferred from other hospitals, Age group between 21 - 60 years old, ASA I and II.

You may not qualify if:

  • Refusal of participation in the study,
  • Patient with no signs of sepsis,
  • Patients who died within 24 hours after admission,
  • Patients concomitantly received carbapenems and other broad-spectrum beta-lactams,
  • Data from the second and subsequent hospitalizations of patients who were hospitalized multiple times during the study period and used only the data from the first hospitalization,
  • Patients younger than 21 years old and older than 60 years old.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Ain Shams University Hospitals

Cairo, 002, Egypt

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Rhodes NJ, Wagner JL, Davis SL, Bosso JA, Goff DA, Rybak MJ, Scheetz MH; MAD-ID Research Network. Trends in and Predictors of Carbapenem Consumption across North American Hospitals: Results from a Multicenter Survey by the MAD-ID Research Network. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Jun 24;63(7):e00327-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00327-19. Print 2019 Jul.

    PMID: 31061154BACKGROUND
  • Fleischmann-Struzek C, Mellhammar L, Rose N, Cassini A, Rudd KE, Schlattmann P, Allegranzi B, Reinhart K. Incidence and mortality of hospital- and ICU-treated sepsis: results from an updated and expanded systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Aug;46(8):1552-1562. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06151-x. Epub 2020 Jun 22.

    PMID: 32572531BACKGROUND
  • Ibrahim EH, Sherman G, Ward S, Fraser VJ, Kollef MH. The influence of inadequate antimicrobial treatment of bloodstream infections on patient outcomes in the ICU setting. Chest. 2000 Jul;118(1):146-55. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.1.146.

    PMID: 10893372BACKGROUND
  • Umemura Y, Yamakawa K, Tanaka Y, Yoshimura J, Ogura H, Fujimi S. Efficacy of Carbapenems Compared With Noncarbapenem Broad-Spectrum Beta-Lactam Antibiotics as Initial Antibiotic Therapy Against Sepsis: A Nationwide Observational Study. Crit Care Med. 2023 Sep 1;51(9):1210-1221. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005932. Epub 2023 May 26.

    PMID: 37232855BACKGROUND
  • Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, Machado FR, Mcintyre L, Ostermann M, Prescott HC, Schorr C, Simpson S, Wiersinga WJ, Alshamsi F, Angus DC, Arabi Y, Azevedo L, Beale R, Beilman G, Belley-Cote E, Burry L, Cecconi M, Centofanti J, Coz Yataco A, De Waele J, Dellinger RP, Doi K, Du B, Estenssoro E, Ferrer R, Gomersall C, Hodgson C, Moller MH, Iwashyna T, Jacob S, Kleinpell R, Klompas M, Koh Y, Kumar A, Kwizera A, Lobo S, Masur H, McGloughlin S, Mehta S, Mehta Y, Mer M, Nunnally M, Oczkowski S, Osborn T, Papathanassoglou E, Perner A, Puskarich M, Roberts J, Schweickert W, Seckel M, Sevransky J, Sprung CL, Welte T, Zimmerman J, Levy M. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2. No abstract available.

    PMID: 34599691BACKGROUND
  • Abe T, Ogura H, Shiraishi A, Kushimoto S, Saitoh D, Fujishima S, Mayumi T, Shiino Y, Nakada TA, Tarui T, Hifumi T, Otomo Y, Okamoto K, Umemura Y, Kotani J, Sakamoto Y, Sasaki J, Shiraishi SI, Takuma K, Tsuruta R, Hagiwara A, Yamakawa K, Masuno T, Takeyama N, Yamashita N, Ikeda H, Ueyama M, Fujimi S, Gando S; JAAM FORECAST group. Characteristics, management, and in-hospital mortality among patients with severe sepsis in intensive care units in Japan: the FORECAST study. Crit Care. 2018 Nov 22;22(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2186-7.

    PMID: 30466493BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

SepsisBurns

Interventions

MeropenemPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationPiperacillinTazobactam

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

InfectionsSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsWounds and Injuries

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

ThienamycinsCarbapenemsbeta-LactamsLactamsAmidesOrganic ChemicalsHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsPenicillanic AcidPenicillinsAmpicillinPenicillin GSulfur CompoundsSulfonesDrug CombinationsPharmaceutical Preparations

Study Officials

  • Mohamed A Ali, MD

    Ain Shams University

    STUDY CHAIR
  • Osama R Abdelmalek, MD

    Ain Shams University

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Thabet A Botros, MD

    Ain Shams University

    STUDY DIRECTOR
  • Aya A Bayoumy, MD

    Ain Sham University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: each drug will be given to every group according to dose according to Patient weight per KG
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
assistant lecturer of anesthesia and ICU

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 4, 2025

First Posted

July 31, 2025

Study Start

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion

January 15, 2026

Study Completion

March 1, 2026

Last Updated

October 3, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Data Available with the corresponding author on visible request this is for patients privacy

Locations