Comparison Between Carbapenems and Noncarbapenem Beta-lactam Antibiotics in Septic Burn Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
400
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this work is to evaluate the efficacy associated with Meropenem(example of carbapenems) as initial therapy for sepsis in burn patients compared with Pipracillin/Tazobactam (example of non carbapenem beta lactam antibiotics).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1 sepsis
Started Jan 2024
Typical duration for phase_1 sepsis
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 4, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 31, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 15, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2026
CompletedOctober 3, 2025
September 1, 2025
2 years
July 4, 2025
September 30, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The primary outcome is to evaluate survival rate associated with carbapenems as initial therapy for sepsis in burn patients compared with non carbapenem antibiotics by comparing SOFA score between two groups.
The primary outcome of this work is to evaluate rate of survival associated with carbapenems as initial therapy for sepsis in burn patients compared with non carbapenem antibiotics by measuring SOFA score at day 4 and day 7 of starting of treatment.
2 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Occurrence rate of enterocolitis due to Clostridium difficile. (rate of patients with diarrhea and stool culture shows Clostridium difficile in each group).
2 weeks
Study Arms (2)
Meronem group
ACTIVE COMPARATORMeronem group will receive Meronem 2 gm Iv infusion over 3 hours every 8 hours per day
Tazocin group
ACTIVE COMPARATORTazocin group will receive non Carbapenems (Tazocin) 4.5 gm IV slow infusion over 20 minutes every 8 hours per day
Interventions
Non C group will receive non Carbapenems (Tazocin) 4.5 gm IV slow infusion over 20 minutes every 8 hours per day
Non C group will receive non Carbapenems (Tazocin) 4.5 gm IV slow infusion over 20 minutes every 8 hours per day
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Burned patients admitted to Burn Unit of Ain Shams university hospitals diagnosed with sepsis, not transferred from other hospitals, Age group between 21 - 60 years old, ASA I and II.
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal of participation in the study,
- Patient with no signs of sepsis,
- Patients who died within 24 hours after admission,
- Patients concomitantly received carbapenems and other broad-spectrum beta-lactams,
- Data from the second and subsequent hospitalizations of patients who were hospitalized multiple times during the study period and used only the data from the first hospitalization,
- Patients younger than 21 years old and older than 60 years old.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ain Shams University Hospitals
Cairo, 002, Egypt
Related Publications (6)
Rhodes NJ, Wagner JL, Davis SL, Bosso JA, Goff DA, Rybak MJ, Scheetz MH; MAD-ID Research Network. Trends in and Predictors of Carbapenem Consumption across North American Hospitals: Results from a Multicenter Survey by the MAD-ID Research Network. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Jun 24;63(7):e00327-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00327-19. Print 2019 Jul.
PMID: 31061154BACKGROUNDFleischmann-Struzek C, Mellhammar L, Rose N, Cassini A, Rudd KE, Schlattmann P, Allegranzi B, Reinhart K. Incidence and mortality of hospital- and ICU-treated sepsis: results from an updated and expanded systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2020 Aug;46(8):1552-1562. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-06151-x. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
PMID: 32572531BACKGROUNDIbrahim EH, Sherman G, Ward S, Fraser VJ, Kollef MH. The influence of inadequate antimicrobial treatment of bloodstream infections on patient outcomes in the ICU setting. Chest. 2000 Jul;118(1):146-55. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.1.146.
PMID: 10893372BACKGROUNDUmemura Y, Yamakawa K, Tanaka Y, Yoshimura J, Ogura H, Fujimi S. Efficacy of Carbapenems Compared With Noncarbapenem Broad-Spectrum Beta-Lactam Antibiotics as Initial Antibiotic Therapy Against Sepsis: A Nationwide Observational Study. Crit Care Med. 2023 Sep 1;51(9):1210-1221. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005932. Epub 2023 May 26.
PMID: 37232855BACKGROUNDEvans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, Antonelli M, Coopersmith CM, French C, Machado FR, Mcintyre L, Ostermann M, Prescott HC, Schorr C, Simpson S, Wiersinga WJ, Alshamsi F, Angus DC, Arabi Y, Azevedo L, Beale R, Beilman G, Belley-Cote E, Burry L, Cecconi M, Centofanti J, Coz Yataco A, De Waele J, Dellinger RP, Doi K, Du B, Estenssoro E, Ferrer R, Gomersall C, Hodgson C, Moller MH, Iwashyna T, Jacob S, Kleinpell R, Klompas M, Koh Y, Kumar A, Kwizera A, Lobo S, Masur H, McGloughlin S, Mehta S, Mehta Y, Mer M, Nunnally M, Oczkowski S, Osborn T, Papathanassoglou E, Perner A, Puskarich M, Roberts J, Schweickert W, Seckel M, Sevransky J, Sprung CL, Welte T, Zimmerman J, Levy M. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-1247. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y. Epub 2021 Oct 2. No abstract available.
PMID: 34599691BACKGROUNDAbe T, Ogura H, Shiraishi A, Kushimoto S, Saitoh D, Fujishima S, Mayumi T, Shiino Y, Nakada TA, Tarui T, Hifumi T, Otomo Y, Okamoto K, Umemura Y, Kotani J, Sakamoto Y, Sasaki J, Shiraishi SI, Takuma K, Tsuruta R, Hagiwara A, Yamakawa K, Masuno T, Takeyama N, Yamashita N, Ikeda H, Ueyama M, Fujimi S, Gando S; JAAM FORECAST group. Characteristics, management, and in-hospital mortality among patients with severe sepsis in intensive care units in Japan: the FORECAST study. Crit Care. 2018 Nov 22;22(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2186-7.
PMID: 30466493BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Mohamed A Ali, MD
Ain Shams University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Osama R Abdelmalek, MD
Ain Shams University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Thabet A Botros, MD
Ain Shams University
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Aya A Bayoumy, MD
Ain Sham University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- assistant lecturer of anesthesia and ICU
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 4, 2025
First Posted
July 31, 2025
Study Start
January 1, 2024
Primary Completion
January 15, 2026
Study Completion
March 1, 2026
Last Updated
October 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data Available with the corresponding author on visible request this is for patients privacy