Scaling Up Point-of-Care Hepatitis C Testing and Treatment in Canada
SCALE POCT
2 other identifiers
observational
300
1 country
12
Brief Summary
The SCALE-POCT study is a national initiative designed to provide robust evidence for scaling up point-of-care hepatitis C testing for key populations. The study seeks to map current hepatitis C clinical processes, identify barriers and facilitators to implementation, and co-design practical tools and strategies in partnership with stakeholders. A major obstacle to hepatitis C elimination and increasing treatment uptake is the current multi-step diagnostic process, which leads to loss to follow-up and treatment delays, particularly among high-risk groups such as people who inject drugs. Point of-care hepatitis C antibody tests (results: 5-20 mins) and RNA tests (results: 60 mins), could enable single-visit diagnosis, reducing loss to follow-up. However, integrating these tests into key settings presents challenges. The overarching goal of this study is to generate evidence to inform the scale-up point-of-care hepatitis C testing and treatment in key settings in Canada. This study is observational in nature and does not involve the direct implementation of point-of-care hepatitis C testing. Instead, it aims to understand the contextual, procedural, and operational factors that would support its successful adoption and sustainability. By examining existing care models and engaging with key stakeholders, the study seeks to build a foundation for future implementation efforts. Specific objectives include:
- 1.Map current hepatitis C care processes and explore how point-of-care testing could fit into these models;
- 2.Identify barriers and facilitators to implementing point-of-care hepatitis C testing across settings and provinces;
- 3.Co-design tools and strategies (such as training guides, standard procedures) to support point-of-care testing;
- 4.Assess feasibility, acceptability, and costs of the co-designed tools and strategies.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started May 2025
Typical duration for all trials
12 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 20, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 3, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 31, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 20, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 20, 2028
July 31, 2025
July 1, 2025
2.1 years
July 3, 2025
July 23, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Measure Barriers and facilitators based on the CFIR Constructs
Using the ERIC Taxonomy and the CFIR-ERIC Matching Tool, we will link identified barriers and facilitators to evidence-based implementation strategies. The ERIC Taxonomy includes 73 strategies across 9 clusters, such as training stakeholders, supporting clinicians, engaging consumers, and changing infrastructure. This step will produce a matrix that maps each barrier and facilitator to one or more relevant strategies.
1 year
Acceptability and Feasibility of Point-of-Care Testing Strategies (Provider/Manager Survey, Section 2)
The questionnaire adapts the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) and Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) to assess acceptability and feasibility. Each strategy is evaluated with 8 Likert-scale questions (1-5). Data will be aggregated as mean scores, with higher scores (minimum score: 8, maximum score: 40) indicating greater perceived acceptability/feasibility.
1 year
Acceptability and Feasibility of Point-of-Care Testing Strategies (Provider/Manager Survey, Section 3)
The questionnaire adapts the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change (ORIC) tool to assess feasibility by evaluating if the organization has the commitment and confidence in its ability to implement change. Feasability is assessed through with 12 Likert-scale questions (1-5, minimum score: 12, maximum score: 60)
1 year
Sustainability of Point-of-Care Testing Strategies using the Time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC)
Time-driven activity-based costing methodology will guide assessment of costs incurred by health resource use during the patient care cycle to determine the sustainability of the point-of-care testing. This will be done by: 1) determining the frequency, capacity, and average duration of each implementation action by actors, as well as actors' total time spent on each action; 2) determine the price per hour of each actor; 3) determine non-personnel, fixed resources, and their associated expenses; 4) creation and use of a TDABC resource costing matrix to blueprint site-specific implementation processes and calculate total costs;
1 year
Study Arms (4)
Consumers
Individuals aged ≥18 years who have a risk factor for HCV acquisition or are attending a site that provides services to people with an HCV acquisition risk
Provider and manager
Participants must be currently employed at one of the research sites and involved in or supervising the delivery of HCV-related services.
Decision-maker
Participants must hold a position in local, provincial, or national government, health authority or another organization that influences HCV testing and treatment policies and be able to provide insights into the strategic planning and funding for HCV care.
Laboratory and quality assurance stakeholder
Participants must hold a role in laboratory services, quality assurance, or regulatory oversight of point-of-care testing at the provincial, national, or organizational level.
Interventions
Exploring the pre-implementation of HCV Point of care antibody and RNA tests
Eligibility Criteria
Adults at risk of HCV (current/past injecting drug use, current/previous incarceration, HIV, having a tattoo/piercing in an unregulated environment). Providers (e.g., physicians, nurses, harm reduction workers, street workers) and managers who work with those at risk of HCV, involved in or supervising the delivery of HCV-related services. Decision-makers: People who hold a position in local, provincial, or national government, health authority, or another organization that influences HCV testing and treatment policies and be able to provide insights into the strategic planning and funding for HCV care. Laboratory and quality assurance stakeholders: People who provide laboratory services, quality assurance, or regulatory oversight of point-of-care testing at the provincial, national, or organizational level.
You may qualify if:
- Individuals aged ≥18 years who have a risk factor for HCV acquisition or are attending a site that provides services to people with an HCV acquisition risk.
- Service providers and managers who are currently employed at a site providing HCV-related services, involved in or supervising the delivery of HCV-related services.
- Policymaker must hold a position in local, provincial, or national government or a health authority that influences HCV testing/treatment policies and be able to provide insights into the strategic planning and funding for HCV care.
- Laboratory and quality assurance stakeholders must hold a role in laboratory services, quality assurance, or regulatory oversight of point-of-care testing at the provincial, national, or organizational level.
You may not qualify if:
- Younger than 18 years old
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- McGill Universitylead
- The University of New South Walescollaborator
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)collaborator
- Jewish General Hospitalcollaborator
- University of British Columbiacollaborator
- British Columbia Centre for Disease Controlcollaborator
- University of Torontocollaborator
- York Universitycollaborator
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institutecollaborator
- University of Ottawacollaborator
- McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centrecollaborator
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréalcollaborator
- Lady Davis Institutecollaborator
- International Network on Health and Hepatitis in Substance Userscollaborator
- Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC)collaborator
- Canadian Association of People who Use Drugscollaborator
- Action Hepatitis Canadacollaborator
- Canadian Liver Foundationcollaborator
- CATIEcollaborator
- Canadian Network on Hepatitis Ccollaborator
Study Sites (12)
Anonyme L'Unite D'Intervention
Montreal, Quebec, H1N 1W2, Canada
McGill University
Montreal, Quebec, H3S 1L8, Canada
Indigenous Health Centre of Tiohtià:ke
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
L'Anonyme
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Centre de réadaptation en dépendance de Québec (CRDQ)
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Medicins du Monde
Montreal, Canada
Okanagan prison
Okanagan, Canada
SABSA Cooperative
Québec, Canada
Sioux Lookout First Nation Health Authority
Sioux Lookout, Canada
Ontario - Provincial correction
Toronto, Canada
Rapid Access Addiction Clinic St Paul's Hospital
Vancouver, Canada
Maamwesying North Shore Community Health Services
Wawa, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Mooney M, Weight C, Biondi MJ, Grebely J, Kronfli N, Barnett T, Bruneau J, Dunn K, Elakpa DN, Etherington C, Greenaway C, Martel-Laferriere V, Mendlowitz A, Taylor N, Fontaine G. Scaling up point-of-care hepatitis C testing in Canada: protocol for a multilevel implementation science study of clinical processes, barriers, facilitators and implementation strategies (SCALE-POCT study). Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Dec 18. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00837-3. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 41408357DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Guillaume Fontaine, RN, PhD
McGill University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Target Duration
- 1 Month
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 3, 2025
First Posted
July 31, 2025
Study Start
May 20, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 20, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 20, 2028
Last Updated
July 31, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
We won't share IPD, we will share aggregated and analyzed data.