NCT07089485

Brief Summary

Noise in hospital environments, particularly in operating rooms, poses challenges to both patient comfort and healthcare professionals' performance. Among the sources of noise, anesthesia monitoring alarms are essential for patient safety, yet no clear guidelines exist regarding their optimal sound level. Excessive alarm volume may increase distraction and cognitive load, especially for surgical trainees, potentially impairing their focus and performance during procedures. This randomized pilot interventional study aims to evaluate the impact of anesthesia alarm sound intensity on the mental workload of surgical trainees performing simulated surgeries. Participants will be randomly assigned to conditions with either an optimized alarm volume or a higher standard volume during simulated tasks. Cognitive load will be assessed using objective physiological measures such as heart rate variability and pupillometry, as well as subjective evaluations with tools like the NASA-TLX and SURG-TLX scales. The primary goal is to determine whether an optimized alarm sound level can reduce cognitive strain without compromising vigilance required for patient safety. Findings from this study are expected to provide evidence-based recommendations for auditory ergonomics in operating rooms, ultimately improving working conditions for surgical teams and enhancing both training and patient safety.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
26

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
5mo left

Started Sep 2025

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress61%
Sep 2025Sep 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 10, 2025

Completed
18 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 28, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 25, 2025

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 25, 2026

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 26, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

September 25, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

July 10, 2025

Last Update Submit

September 22, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Noise/adverse effectsCognition DisordersSurgical procedures

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Impact of the optimal sound intensity level during a surgical procedure

    Assessment of heart and respiratory rate variability parameters

    From inclusion (baseline) to 6 months post-inclusion

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Interference with the surgical procedure

    From inclusion (baseline) until the end of the surgical procedure

  • Mental workload of the surgical trainee

    From inclusion (baseline) until the end of the surgical procedure

Study Arms (1)

surgical trainees group

OTHER

The study group consists of surgical trainees with limited experience in simulated surgery. They will perform multiple 15-minute surgical sequences in a controlled environment, where anesthesia alarm sound levels will vary between 64 and 75 dB(A). These sound levels will be randomized across the sequences to assess the impact of noise on their mental workload, concentration, and surgical performance.

Other: effects of sound

Interventions

The surgical trainees will perform four 15-minute surgical sequences in a controlled environment, with varying sound levels (64, 67, 73, and 75 dB(A)) randomized across the sequences to assess the surgeons' responses.

surgical trainees group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Surgical residents or experienced surgeons;
  • Surgeons with normal hearing;
  • Surgeons capable of performing surgical sutures (regardless of skill level);
  • Surgeons able and willing to follow all study procedures according to the protocol;
  • Surgeons who have understood, signed, and dated the informed consent form provided on the day of enrollment.

You may not qualify if:

  • Surgeons undergoing beta-blocker treatment;
  • Surgeons with known cardiac pathology;
  • Surgeons who do not consent to participate in the study;
  • Surgeons with known hearing problems;
  • Surgeons who fail the hearing test;
  • Surgeons who worked on-call or night shifts during the night before the evaluation day.
  • Surgical trainees at the Lorraine Cancer Institute.
  • Adults under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship, or legal supervision);Persons deprived of liberty;Pregnant or breastfeeding women.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (10)

  • Roche TR, Said S, Braun J, Maas EJC, Machado C, Grande B, Kolbe M, Spahn DR, Nothiger CB, Tscholl DW. Avatar-based patient monitoring in critical anaesthesia events: a randomised high-fidelity simulation study. Br J Anaesth. 2021 May;126(5):1046-1054. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.01.015. Epub 2021 Apr 8.

    PMID: 33879327BACKGROUND
  • Torabizadeh C, Yousefinya A, Zand F, Rakhshan M, Fararooei M. A nurses' alarm fatigue questionnaire: development and psychometric properties. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017 Dec;31(6):1305-1312. doi: 10.1007/s10877-016-9958-x. Epub 2016 Nov 15.

    PMID: 27848141BACKGROUND
  • Way TJ, Long A, Weihing J, Ritchie R, Jones R, Bush M, Shinn JB. Effect of noise on auditory processing in the operating room. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 May;216(5):933-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.048. Epub 2013 Mar 18.

    PMID: 23518255BACKGROUND
  • Whitham MD, Casali JG, Smith GK, Allihien AL, Wright BW, Barter SM, Urban AR, Dudley DJ, Fuller RR. Noise in cesarean deliveries: a comprehensive analysis of noise environments in the Labor and Delivery operating room and evaluation of a visual alarm noise abatement program. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 May;5(5):100887. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100887. Epub 2023 Feb 11.

    PMID: 36781121BACKGROUND
  • Schmid F, Goepfert MS, Kuhnt D, Eichhorn V, Diedrichs S, Reichenspurner H, Goetz AE, Reuter DA. The wolf is crying in the operating room: patient monitor and anesthesia workstation alarming patterns during cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2011 Jan;112(1):78-83. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181fcc504. Epub 2010 Oct 21.

    PMID: 20966440BACKGROUND
  • Katz JD. Noise in the operating room. Anesthesiology. 2014 Oct;121(4):894-8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000319. No abstract available.

    PMID: 24878496BACKGROUND
  • Lamotte AS, Essadek A, Shadili G, Perez JM, Raft J. The Impact of Classroom Chatter Noise on Comprehension: A Systematic Review. Percept Mot Skills. 2021 Jun;128(3):1275-1291. doi: 10.1177/00315125211005935. Epub 2021 Mar 27.

    PMID: 33775178BACKGROUND
  • Fu VX, Oomens P, Sneiders D, van den Berg SAA, Feelders RA, Wijnhoven BPL, Jeekel J. The Effect of Perioperative Music on the Stress Response to Surgery: A Meta-analysis. J Surg Res. 2019 Dec;244:444-455. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.052. Epub 2019 Jul 18.

    PMID: 31326711BACKGROUND
  • El Boghdady M, Ewalds-Kvist BM. The influence of music on the surgical task performance: A systematic review. Int J Surg. 2020 Jan;73:101-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.012. Epub 2019 Nov 22.

    PMID: 31760139BACKGROUND
  • Oomens P, Fu VX, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J. The effect of music on simulated surgical performance: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep;33(9):2774-2784. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06868-x. Epub 2019 May 28.

    PMID: 31140001BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hearing DisordersCognition Disorders

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Ear DiseasesOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesSensation DisordersNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsNeurocognitive DisordersMental Disorders

Study Officials

  • Frédéric MARCHAL, Pr.

    Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Nour Mammari Halabi, PhD.

    Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine

    STUDY CHAIR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Model Details: This prospective interventional study will evaluate the impact of different noise levels in the operating room on surgeons' performance in simulation.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2025

First Posted

July 28, 2025

Study Start

September 25, 2025

Primary Completion

March 25, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 26, 2026

Last Updated

September 25, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

At this time, the individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to concerns regarding participant privacy and confidentiality, as well as institutional policies restricting data sharing.