Impact of Anesthesia Alarm Volume on Mental Workload in Surgical Trainees
ASLEC02
1 other identifier
interventional
26
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Noise in hospital environments, particularly in operating rooms, poses challenges to both patient comfort and healthcare professionals' performance. Among the sources of noise, anesthesia monitoring alarms are essential for patient safety, yet no clear guidelines exist regarding their optimal sound level. Excessive alarm volume may increase distraction and cognitive load, especially for surgical trainees, potentially impairing their focus and performance during procedures. This randomized pilot interventional study aims to evaluate the impact of anesthesia alarm sound intensity on the mental workload of surgical trainees performing simulated surgeries. Participants will be randomly assigned to conditions with either an optimized alarm volume or a higher standard volume during simulated tasks. Cognitive load will be assessed using objective physiological measures such as heart rate variability and pupillometry, as well as subjective evaluations with tools like the NASA-TLX and SURG-TLX scales. The primary goal is to determine whether an optimized alarm sound level can reduce cognitive strain without compromising vigilance required for patient safety. Findings from this study are expected to provide evidence-based recommendations for auditory ergonomics in operating rooms, ultimately improving working conditions for surgical teams and enhancing both training and patient safety.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2025
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 28, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 25, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 25, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 26, 2026
ExpectedSeptember 25, 2025
September 1, 2025
6 months
July 10, 2025
September 22, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Impact of the optimal sound intensity level during a surgical procedure
Assessment of heart and respiratory rate variability parameters
From inclusion (baseline) to 6 months post-inclusion
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Interference with the surgical procedure
From inclusion (baseline) until the end of the surgical procedure
Mental workload of the surgical trainee
From inclusion (baseline) until the end of the surgical procedure
Study Arms (1)
surgical trainees group
OTHERThe study group consists of surgical trainees with limited experience in simulated surgery. They will perform multiple 15-minute surgical sequences in a controlled environment, where anesthesia alarm sound levels will vary between 64 and 75 dB(A). These sound levels will be randomized across the sequences to assess the impact of noise on their mental workload, concentration, and surgical performance.
Interventions
The surgical trainees will perform four 15-minute surgical sequences in a controlled environment, with varying sound levels (64, 67, 73, and 75 dB(A)) randomized across the sequences to assess the surgeons' responses.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Surgical residents or experienced surgeons;
- Surgeons with normal hearing;
- Surgeons capable of performing surgical sutures (regardless of skill level);
- Surgeons able and willing to follow all study procedures according to the protocol;
- Surgeons who have understood, signed, and dated the informed consent form provided on the day of enrollment.
You may not qualify if:
- Surgeons undergoing beta-blocker treatment;
- Surgeons with known cardiac pathology;
- Surgeons who do not consent to participate in the study;
- Surgeons with known hearing problems;
- Surgeons who fail the hearing test;
- Surgeons who worked on-call or night shifts during the night before the evaluation day.
- Surgical trainees at the Lorraine Cancer Institute.
- Adults under legal protection (guardianship, curatorship, or legal supervision);Persons deprived of liberty;Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (10)
Roche TR, Said S, Braun J, Maas EJC, Machado C, Grande B, Kolbe M, Spahn DR, Nothiger CB, Tscholl DW. Avatar-based patient monitoring in critical anaesthesia events: a randomised high-fidelity simulation study. Br J Anaesth. 2021 May;126(5):1046-1054. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2021.01.015. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
PMID: 33879327BACKGROUNDTorabizadeh C, Yousefinya A, Zand F, Rakhshan M, Fararooei M. A nurses' alarm fatigue questionnaire: development and psychometric properties. J Clin Monit Comput. 2017 Dec;31(6):1305-1312. doi: 10.1007/s10877-016-9958-x. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
PMID: 27848141BACKGROUNDWay TJ, Long A, Weihing J, Ritchie R, Jones R, Bush M, Shinn JB. Effect of noise on auditory processing in the operating room. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 May;216(5):933-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.048. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
PMID: 23518255BACKGROUNDWhitham MD, Casali JG, Smith GK, Allihien AL, Wright BW, Barter SM, Urban AR, Dudley DJ, Fuller RR. Noise in cesarean deliveries: a comprehensive analysis of noise environments in the Labor and Delivery operating room and evaluation of a visual alarm noise abatement program. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2023 May;5(5):100887. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.100887. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
PMID: 36781121BACKGROUNDSchmid F, Goepfert MS, Kuhnt D, Eichhorn V, Diedrichs S, Reichenspurner H, Goetz AE, Reuter DA. The wolf is crying in the operating room: patient monitor and anesthesia workstation alarming patterns during cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg. 2011 Jan;112(1):78-83. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181fcc504. Epub 2010 Oct 21.
PMID: 20966440BACKGROUNDKatz JD. Noise in the operating room. Anesthesiology. 2014 Oct;121(4):894-8. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000319. No abstract available.
PMID: 24878496BACKGROUNDLamotte AS, Essadek A, Shadili G, Perez JM, Raft J. The Impact of Classroom Chatter Noise on Comprehension: A Systematic Review. Percept Mot Skills. 2021 Jun;128(3):1275-1291. doi: 10.1177/00315125211005935. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
PMID: 33775178BACKGROUNDFu VX, Oomens P, Sneiders D, van den Berg SAA, Feelders RA, Wijnhoven BPL, Jeekel J. The Effect of Perioperative Music on the Stress Response to Surgery: A Meta-analysis. J Surg Res. 2019 Dec;244:444-455. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.06.052. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
PMID: 31326711BACKGROUNDEl Boghdady M, Ewalds-Kvist BM. The influence of music on the surgical task performance: A systematic review. Int J Surg. 2020 Jan;73:101-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.012. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
PMID: 31760139BACKGROUNDOomens P, Fu VX, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J. The effect of music on simulated surgical performance: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2019 Sep;33(9):2774-2784. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06868-x. Epub 2019 May 28.
PMID: 31140001BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Frédéric MARCHAL, Pr.
Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine
- STUDY CHAIR
Nour Mammari Halabi, PhD.
Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 10, 2025
First Posted
July 28, 2025
Study Start
September 25, 2025
Primary Completion
March 25, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 26, 2026
Last Updated
September 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
At this time, the individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to concerns regarding participant privacy and confidentiality, as well as institutional policies restricting data sharing.