NCT07083778

Brief Summary

This prospective randomized controlled trial compared the outcomes of laser versus open surgical techniques in the management of fistula-in-ano among 100 patients at a tertiary care center. Patients were diagnosed with intersphincteric or transsphincteric fistulas using clinical examination and MR fistulogram and were randomly assigned to undergo either laser surgery (n=50) or open surgery (n=50). The primary endpoints included postoperative pain, hospital stay duration, and time to return to normal activity. Secondary outcomes assessed were recurrence, wound infection, incontinence, need for reoperation, and patient satisfaction.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 1, 2024

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 2, 2025

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 24, 2025

Completed
8 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

July 24, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

July 2, 2025

Last Update Submit

July 21, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Fistula-in-anoLaser fistula surgeryFistulotomyFistulectomyPostoperative painHealing rateRandomized controlled trialRecurrenceIncontinenceIntersphincteric fistulaTranssphincteric fistula

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Postoperative Pain at 48 Hours

    Assessment of postoperative pain using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scored from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable), recorded at 48 hours after surgery.

    48 hours post-surgery

  • Length of Hospital Stay

    Total number of days the patient remains admitted in the hospital from the day of surgery until discharge.

    From day of surgery to discharge (typically within 7 days)

  • Time to Return to Normal Work

    Number of days taken by the patient to resume normal daily activities or work, as self-reported during follow-up visits.

    Within 6 weeks post-surgery

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Fistula Recurrence Rate

    Between 16 to 20 weeks post-surgery

  • Time to Complete Healing

    Within 3 months post-surgery

  • Anal Incontinence Rate (Wexner Score)

    Assessed at each follow-up up to 6 months

  • Anal Stenosis Rate

    Within 3 months post-surgery

Study Arms (2)

Experimental - Laser Surgery Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients randomized to this arm will undergo laser ablation of the fistula tract using a radial fiber laser probe (e.g., FiLaC technique). The procedure is performed under spinal or general anesthesia. The internal opening is closed, and laser energy (10W in pulsed mode) is delivered circumferentially along the fistula tract to ablate it. All patients will receive standard perioperative care, including IV antibiotics preoperatively and oral antibiotics postoperatively.

Procedure: Laser Fistula Surgery (FiLaC - Fistula-tract Laser Closure)

Active Comparator - Open Surgery Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Patients randomized to this arm will undergo standard open surgery (fistulotomy or fistulectomy or LIFT ), depending on the anatomy of the fistula. The tract will be laid open or excised under spinal anesthesia. Wounds will be left to heal by secondary intention. Standard postoperative care includes oral antibiotics, analgesia, sitz baths, and regular dressings.

Procedure: Open Fistula Surgery (Fistulotomy, Fistulectomy, or LIFT Procedure)

Interventions

A minimally invasive procedure using a radial fiber diode laser probe to ablate the fistula tract. Laser energy (10W in pulsed mode) is applied circumferentially as the probe is slowly withdrawn, leading to shrinkage and closure of the fistula tract. The internal opening is closed with absorbable sutures. The procedure is done under spinal or general anesthesia.

Experimental - Laser Surgery Group

Patients in this group will undergo standard open surgical treatment for fistula-in-ano. Based on the type and location of the fistula (intersphincteric or transsphincteric), the surgical procedure may be: * Fistulotomy: Laying open the fistula tract. * Fistulectomy: Excision of the entire fistulous tract. * LIFT Procedure: Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract, preserving the sphincter complex. This sphincter-sparing technique is chosen for transsphincteric fistulas when appropriate. All procedures are performed under spinal anesthesia. The choice of technique is individualized based on MR fistulogram findings and intraoperative assessment. Wounds are managed with regular dressings and allowed to heal by secondary intention. Standard postoperative care includes antibiotics, analgesia, and sitz baths. Follow-up is done at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months.

Active Comparator - Open Surgery Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patient with intersphincter \& transphincter fistula in ano as confirmed by clinical examination followed by MR fistulogram.
  • Age 18 to 65 years
  • Non responders and Recurrent Patient giving written informed consent of selected fistula surgery and having awareness about alternative procedures.

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant women
  • Patients of fistula in ano associated with other conditions(HIV, tubercular disease, IBD, Ca rectum.)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kamal Raj

Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, 208002, India

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Patel KR, Jauhari RK, Shukla P. A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Laser Versus Open Surgical Approaches in the Management of Fistula-in-Ano at a Tertiary Care Center. Cureus. 2025 Aug 19;17(8):e90471. doi: 10.7759/cureus.90471. eCollection 2025 Aug.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Rectal FistulaPain, PostoperativeRecurrence

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Intestinal FistulaDigestive System FistulaDigestive System DiseasesIntestinal DiseasesGastrointestinal DiseasesRectal DiseasesFistulaPathological Conditions, AnatomicalPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPostoperative ComplicationsPathologic ProcessesPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsDisease Attributes

Study Officials

  • Kamal Raj, MS surgery

    GSVM MEDICAL COLLEGE , KANPUR

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study is a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial designed to compare the efficacy and safety of laser ablation (FiLaC technique) versus conventional open surgical techniques (fistulotomy/fistulectomy) in patients diagnosed with intersphincteric or transsphincteric fistula-in-ano. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo either laser surgery or open surgery after evaluation through clinical examination and MR fistulogram. Both groups were managed as per standard operative protocols and followed up for a period of three months. The study assessed both clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes, including postoperative pain (VAS score), duration of hospital stay, time to resume daily activities, healing rate, recurrence, postoperative complications (like incontinence, wound infection), and overall patient satisfaction. This model evaluates the utility of a minimally invasive sphincter-preserving laser technique in comparison to the tradition
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Junior Resident , Department of general Surgery

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 2, 2025

First Posted

July 24, 2025

Study Start

April 1, 2024

Primary Completion

August 1, 2025

Study Completion

September 1, 2025

Last Updated

July 24, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual-level data related to primary and secondary outcomes.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
Time Frame
After publication of the main results, for up to 5 years.
Access Criteria
Qualified researchers upon reasonable request.
More information

Locations