NCT07082322

Brief Summary

Background: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) and sepsis continue to pose significant public health challenges, contributing to high morbidity and mortality worldwide. According to the Global Burden of Diseases Study, BSIs and sepsis are associated with approximately 20% of global deaths. However, the clinical characteristics of BSIs have evolved over recent years, showing significant variability across different countries and continents. The diversity in management standards across regions further complicates the generalization and transferability of research findings. Despite the critical need for comprehensive data, BSI research in Europe remains fragmented, often limited to national-level studies. Project Aim: The EPIC-BSI project aims to address these challenges by establishing a multinational, collaborative bloodstream infection cohort across Europe and globally. The primary objectives are to:

  • Integrate national BSI research into a cohesive multinational cohort that enable large-scale comparative research by standardizing BSI incidence data, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, and patient outcomes across European countries and beyond.
  • Monitor shifts in BSI characteristics, including the emergence of multi-drug resistant organisms, and changes in risk groups, diagnostics, and therapies.
  • Create a foundation for future studies and collaborations, such as integrating BSI data with international antibiotic usage, population data, health policy data, or by biobanking blood-borne pathogens for sequencing. The study is divided into three arms focusing on BSI epidemiology (EPIC-BSI registry), diagnostics (EPIC-BSI Diagnostic Study) and management (EPIC-BSI Management study). The EPIC-BSI Management study is partitioned in different levels of data contribution to reduce barriers for centres and enable broad participation. Specific Objectives and Endpoints: EPIC-BSI Registry:
  • Primary aim/endpoint: Establish an international prospective BSI cohort with anonymized inclusion of all BSI cases from participating centres allowing estimation of BSI incidence by pathogen in the participating centres.
  • Secondary aims/endpoints:
  • Analyse the incidence of BSIs across different settings and countries.
  • Monitor changes in patient demographics (age, gender) and acquisition modes.
  • Track shifts in antimicrobial resistance patterns.
  • Review effects of infection control practices on MDRO-BSI frequency EPIC-BSI Diagnostic Study:
  • Primary aim/endpoint: Biannual evaluation of diagnostic procedures and standards regarding BSI at participating centres
  • Secondary aims/endpoints:
  • Assess the availability and use of (new) clinical and microbiological diagnostics.
  • Identify gaps in diagnostic practices and time lags between scientific evidence, guideline publication and clinical implementation of new diagnostic utilities. EPIC-BSI Management Study:
  • Primary aim/endpoint: Analyse clinical data from BSI cases to evaluate management practices regarding the effect on in-hospital mortality and outcome on day 90 after onset incl. patient-reported outcomes (Desirability-of-outcome-ranking (DOOR) or health-related quality of life metrics)
  • Secondary aims/endpoints:
  • Identify differences in clinical management across countries and hospital types.
  • Analyse the impact of antimicrobial resistance patterns on clinical outcomes.
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of different established therapeutic regimens.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
57mo left

Started Sep 2025

Longer than P75 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress13%
Sep 2025Jan 2031

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 5, 2025

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 24, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2025

Completed
5.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2031

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2031

Last Updated

July 24, 2025

Status Verified

July 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

5.3 years

First QC Date

July 5, 2025

Last Update Submit

July 15, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

RegistryTherapeutical management

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Incidence of bloodstream infections

    Incidence of bloodstream infection patients stratified by pathogen

    5 years, analysed aggregated by year

  • In hospital mortality

    Fraction of patients that died during hospital stay

    Hospital stay after infection onset until discharge, an average of 3 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Patient-reported health quality

    Day 90 after onset

  • Mortality at day 90

    Day 90

Study Arms (3)

EPIC BSI Registry

Registry of bloodstream infection patients from microbiological databases

EPIC BSI Diagnostics

Repeated survey of participating centers regarding their diagnostic standard of care

EPIC BSI Management

Registry of bloodstream infection patients with focus on clinical course and management

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

All patients that are hospitalised with a blood culture-detected bloodstream infection are eligible for inclusion into this study.

You may qualify if:

  • EPIC-BSI Registry: Positive blood cultures result. For each patient only the first positive blood culture result during 90 days would be counted.
  • EPIC-BSI Diagnostic study: Centre recruiting for the EPIC study with access to microbiological and clinical data.
  • EPIC-BSI Management study - Regular dataset: First two BSI cases per month of (at least two or three) target pathogens (S. aureus, E. faecalis/E. faecium, E. coli, Klebsiella spp., P. aeruginosa, A. baumanii, Streptococcus spp.)

You may not qualify if:

  • EPIC-BSI Registry: Non-comprehensive documentation and reporting of BSI cases, Age \< 18 years
  • EPIC-BSI Diagnostic Study: EPIC BSI centre does not participate in the EPIC BSI Diagnostic Study arm
  • EPIC-BSI Management Study: Non-comprehensive documentation and reporting of BSI cases; Age \< 18 years; For Follow-up part: Patient with dementia or other progressed neurological or vigilance disorder without contact details of legal representative, which makes follow-up unfeasible

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University Hospital Freiburg

Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany

Location

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITHOUT DNA

Microbiological isolates

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sepsis

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

InfectionsSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeInflammationPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Siegbert Rieg, Prof. Dr.

    University Hospital Freiburg

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Philipp Mathé, Dr.

    University Hospital Freiburg

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Target Duration
90 Days
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Prof. Siegbert Rieg/Dr. Philipp Mathé

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2025

First Posted

July 24, 2025

Study Start

September 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2031

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2031

Last Updated

July 24, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

All data analyses and publications are carried out with anonymized data, so that no conclusions can be drawn about the respective patients. At the end of the study, the anonymised data will be saved in a corresponding database for fur- ther scientific use by other research groups upon reasonable request.

Locations