Examining Nurses' Trust and Acceptance of FAIR, an AI-powered Falls Risk Recommender
"You Sure or Not?" Examining the Trust, Acceptance and Adoption of Falls Risk - Artificial Intelligence Recommender (FAIR) System by Nurses
1 other identifier
interventional
60
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
An exploratory mixed-method study will be conducted to test acceptance and trust of an AI-powered falls risk predictor system by inpatient hospital nurses
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2027
Typical duration for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 22, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2027
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2027
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2029
July 22, 2025
July 1, 2025
12 months
June 22, 2025
July 21, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Incidence of FAIR's flag acceptance
Examination of how often the flags raised by FAIR are accepted by nurses, and whether they are accepted or ignored correctly.
1 Day of Study
Time taken to do falls risk assessment
The time taken by the nurses to perform their falls risk assessment will be recorded
1 Day of Study
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Time spent looking at FAIR
1 Day of Study
Baseline and Post-Simulation Nurse trust and acceptance of FAIR
Baseline
Study Arms (2)
Intervention Arm
EXPERIMENTALNurses in the intervention arm will perform will receive training on the nature of AI recommender (FAIR) and how it works, and how they can apply it in their assessment of the patient. After that, they will be introduced to three simulated patients with different conditions and needs - intended to reflect a patient at "low risk of falls", "moderate risk of falls" and "high risk of falls" and asked to read and interpret the FAIR recommendations before making their own falls risk assessment of the patient using mWHeFRA.
Control arm
PLACEBO COMPARATORNurses in the control arms will be reinforced on fall risk assessment methods using the modified Western modified Western Health Falls Risk Assessment Tool (mWHeFRA). After that, they will be introduced to three simulated patients with different conditions and needs - intended to reflect a patient at "low risk of falls", "moderate risk of falls" and "high risk of falls" and asked to perform assessments of the patient mWHeFRA.
Interventions
FAIR is an alert system built into the hospital's electronic medical record system. It is an adaptation of a machine learning model for fall risk calculation built in another hospital in Singapore. FAIR combines multiple patient-specific variables to identify if a patient is at increased risk of falling during their inpatient stay, marking them as a 'falls risk'. Based on the 'flag' raised, the nurse will be instructed to prioritise her falls risk assessment of the patient (If deemed 'high risk') or to do so subsequently as a lower priority once other pressing patient care issues are resolved (if deemed 'low risk'). That way, it ensures the requirements of each patient receiving a falls risk assessment as scored through mWHeFRA are still met, with FAIR allowing nurses to better prioritise their focus and attention on the patient that most needs the assessment at point of admission,
The mWHeFRA is the hospital's standard falls risk assessment tool. All nurses are expected to be proficient in its use to guide their risk assessment of patients
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Practicing nurse involved in falls risk assessments of patients
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tan Tock Seng Hospitallead
- Marquette Universitycollaborator
- Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological Universitycollaborator
Related Publications (1)
Schulz PJ, Lwin MO, Kee KM, Goh WWB, Lam TYT, Sung JJY. Modeling the influence of attitudes, trust, and beliefs on endoscopists' acceptance of artificial intelligence applications in medical practice. Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 28;11:1301563. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1301563. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 38089040BACKGROUND
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Deputy Head of Nursing Research
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 22, 2025
First Posted
July 22, 2025
Study Start (Estimated)
January 1, 2027
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2029
Last Updated
July 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Time Frame
- Available from 2026 to 2036
- Access Criteria
- Individuals will have to contact me as Primary Investigator for permission to use
Will be agreeable to share Protocol Summary page