Multicenter Observational Study of Multimodal AI for Upper GI Mesenchymal Tumor Diagnosis
1 other identifier
observational
130
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study develops a multimodal AI model using endoscopic ultrasound, white-light endoscopy, and clinical information to support the diagnosis of upper GI mesenchymal tumors and the risk stratification of gastric GISTs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jul 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 22, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 28, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2026
ExpectedJuly 31, 2025
July 1, 2025
7 months
July 2, 2025
July 28, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Diagnostic accuracy of a multimodal AI model for differentiating gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) from other upper gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value will be used to evaluate the efficacy of the model
After the training process of the multimodal AI model is completed,on average per year
Predictive accuracy of the multimodal AI model for risk stratification of GISTs
ROC analyses, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value will be used to evaluate the efficacy of the model
After the training process of the multimodal AI model is completed,on average per year
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy Between the Multimodal AI Model and Single-Modality Models
After the training process of the Multimodal AI model is completed,on average per year
Comparison of diagnostic accuracy between the multimodal AI model and experienced endoscopists for differentiating GISTs and non-GIST mesenchymal tumors
After the testing process of the multimodal AI model is completed,on average per year
Comparison of the predictive accuracy for GIST risk stratification between the multimodal AI model and experienced endoscopists
After the testing process of the multimodal AI model is completed,on average per year
Study Arms (1)
All Participants
All enrolled patients with upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions confirmed by histopathology. Each participant will undergo standard diagnostic evaluation and independent multimodal AI prediction and expert endoscopist diagnosis.
Interventions
Patients' endoscopic images, EUS images, and clinical data will be analyzed by a multimodal AI model for lesion classification and GIST risk stratification.
Endoscopic ultrasound images will be interpreted by experienced endoscopists for comparison with the AI model.
Eligibility Criteria
The cohort will be selected from several hospitals in China, including Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology.
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 18 years old
- Patients with an upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesion (SEL) identified by white-light endoscopy and who have completed an endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) examination
- Patients with a histopathological diagnosis of GIST confirmed by surgical or endoscopic resection, or other SELs confirmed by surgical resection, EUS-guided sampling, or other biopsy techniques
- EUS image quality meets the following quality control standards
- Equipment requirements: Olympus EU-ME2/ME1 processor (Olympus Medical Systems Corp., Tokyo, Japan); radial EUS scope (GF-UE260/GF-UE240; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) or linear EUS scope (GF-UCT260/GF-UCT240; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan); miniature probe (UM2R/3R; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan); Pentax ARIETTA 850 processor (Pentax, Tokyo, Japan); radial EUS scope (EG-3670URK, Pentax, Tokyo, Japan); linear EUS scope (EG-3870UT, Pentax, Tokyo, Japan); Fujifilm SU-8000 or SU-9000 processor; linear EUS scope (EG-580UT, Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan); radial EUS scope (EG-580UR, Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan)
- EUS images clearly showing the lesion and surrounding tissue characteristics (at least 5 images or video); must include at least one image of the maximum lesion diameter, one image showing the layer of origin, and one image demonstrating the growth pattern (intraluminal/extraluminal)
- EUS images must not contain artificial annotations, such as measurement scales, biopsy needles, Doppler signals, or elastography overlays
- Image resolution must be at least 448 Ă— 448 pixels
- WLE (white-light endoscopy) image quality meets the following standards: images must clearly show the lesion location, mucosal features, and margins; at least one close-up and one distant view
- Complete clinical data and histopathological reports must be available
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 18 years old
- Absolute contraindications for EUS examination, history of gastric surgery, pregnancy, severe comorbidities, or known allergy to anesthetic agents
- EUS examination terminated prematurely due to esophageal stricture, obstruction, large space-occupying lesions, rapid changes in heart rate or respiratory rate, patient intolerance, or excessive residual food
- EUS image quality does not meet the required quality control standards
- Pathological specimens do not meet diagnostic requirements: insufficient biopsy tissue (only R0 resection specimens are accepted for the GIST group), or incomplete immunohistochemical staining (missing CD117/CD34/DOG-1 expression report for the GIST group)
- Pathological results indicate that the lesion is a metastatic tumor originating from another site
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China
Related Publications (40)
Chinese Society of Digestive Endoscopy Tunnel Technology Collaboration Group, Endoscopist Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association, and Digestive Endoscopy Branch of Beijing Medical Association. Expert Consensus on Endoscopic Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in China (2020, Beijing). Chinese Journal of Digestive Endoscopy, 2021(07): 505-514.
BACKGROUNDShen L, Cao H, Qin S, et al. Chinese Consensus on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (2017 Version). Electronic Journal of Integrated Cancer Therapy, 2018; 4(01): 31-43.
BACKGROUNDGomes RSA, de Oliveira GHP, de Moura DTH, Kotinda APST, Matsubayashi CO, Hirsch BS, Veras MO, Ribeiro Jordao Sasso JG, Trasolini RP, Bernardo WM, de Moura EGH. Endoscopic ultrasound artificial intelligence-assisted for prediction of gastrointestinal stromal tumors diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2023 Aug 16;15(8):528-539. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i8.528.
PMID: 37663113BACKGROUNDAbe K, Tominaga K, Yamamiya A, Inaba Y, Kanamori A, Kondo M, Suzuki T, Watanabe H, Kawano M, Sato T, Yoshitake N, Ohwada T, Konno M, Hanatsuka K, Masuyama H, Goda K, Haruyama Y, Irisawa A; NUTSHELL20 Study group. Natural History of Small Gastric Subepithelial Lesions Less than 20 mm: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study (NUTSHELL20 Study). Digestion. 2023;104(3):174-186. doi: 10.1159/000527421. Epub 2022 Dec 5.
PMID: 36470211RESULTStandards of Practice Committee; Faulx AL, Kothari S, Acosta RD, Agrawal D, Bruining DH, Chandrasekhara V, Eloubeidi MA, Fanelli RD, Gurudu SR, Khashab MA, Lightdale JR, Muthusamy VR, Shaukat A, Qumseya BJ, Wang A, Wani SB, Yang J, DeWitt JM. The role of endoscopy in subepithelial lesions of the GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jun;85(6):1117-1132. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2017.02.022. Epub 2017 Apr 3. No abstract available.
PMID: 28385194RESULTLi J, Ye Y, Wang J, Zhang B, Qin S, Shi Y, He Y, Liang X, Liu X, Zhou Y, Wu X, Zhang X, Wang M, Gao Z, Lin T, Cao H, Shen L, Chinese Society Of Clinical Oncology Csco Expert Committee On Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor. Chinese consensus guidelines for diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Chin J Cancer Res. 2017 Aug;29(4):281-293. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2017.04.01.
PMID: 28947860RESULTMiettinen M, Sobin LH, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 1765 cases with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005 Jan;29(1):52-68. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000146010.92933.de.
PMID: 15613856RESULTKawanowa K, Sakuma Y, Sakurai S, Hishima T, Iwasaki Y, Saito K, Hosoya Y, Nakajima T, Funata N. High incidence of microscopic gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the stomach. Hum Pathol. 2006 Dec;37(12):1527-35. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.07.002. Epub 2006 Sep 25.
PMID: 16996566RESULTPang T, Zhao Y, Fan T, Hu Q, Raymond D, Cao S, Zhang W, Wang Y, Zhang B, Lv Y, Zhang X, Ling T, Zhuge Y, Wang L, Zou X, Huang Q, Xu G. Comparison of Safety and Outcomes between Endoscopic and Surgical Resections of Small (</= 5 cm) Primary Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. J Cancer. 2019 Jul 10;10(17):4132-4141. doi: 10.7150/jca.29443. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31417658RESULTCoe TM, Fero KE, Fanta PT, Mallory RJ, Tang CM, Murphy JD, Sicklick JK. Population-Based Epidemiology and Mortality of Small Malignant Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in the USA. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Jun;20(6):1132-40. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3134-y. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
PMID: 27025710RESULTNishida T, Blay JY, Hirota S, Kitagawa Y, Kang YK. The standard diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of gastrointestinal stromal tumors based on guidelines. Gastric Cancer. 2016 Jan;19(1):3-14. doi: 10.1007/s10120-015-0526-8. Epub 2015 Aug 15.
PMID: 26276366RESULTCasali PG, Abecassis N, Aro HT, Bauer S, Biagini R, Bielack S, Bonvalot S, Boukovinas I, Bovee JVMG, Brodowicz T, Broto JM, Buonadonna A, De Alava E, Dei Tos AP, Del Muro XG, Dileo P, Eriksson M, Fedenko A, Ferraresi V, Ferrari A, Ferrari S, Frezza AM, Gasperoni S, Gelderblom H, Gil T, Grignani G, Gronchi A, Haas RL, Hassan B, Hohenberger P, Issels R, Joensuu H, Jones RL, Judson I, Jutte P, Kaal S, Kasper B, Kopeckova K, Krakorova DA, Le Cesne A, Lugowska I, Merimsky O, Montemurro M, Pantaleo MA, Piana R, Picci P, Piperno-Neumann S, Pousa AL, Reichardt P, Robinson MH, Rutkowski P, Safwat AA, Schoffski P, Sleijfer S, Stacchiotti S, Sundby Hall K, Unk M, Van Coevorden F, van der Graaf WTA, Whelan J, Wardelmann E, Zaikova O, Blay JY; ESMO Guidelines Committee and EURACAN. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;29(Suppl 4):iv267. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy320. No abstract available.
PMID: 30188977RESULTvon Mehren M, Randall RL, Benjamin RS, Boles S, Bui MM, Conrad EU 3rd, Ganjoo KN, George S, Gonzalez RJ, Heslin MJ, Kane JM 3rd, Koon H, Mayerson J, McCarter M, McGarry SV, Meyer C, O'Donnell RJ, Pappo AS, Paz IB, Petersen IA, Pfeifer JD, Riedel RF, Schuetze S, Schupak KD, Schwartz HS, Tap WD, Wayne JD, Bergman MA, Scavone J. Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 2.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Jun;14(6):758-86. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2016.0078.
PMID: 27283169RESULTNishida T, Hirota S, Yanagisawa A, Sugino Y, Minami M, Yamamura Y, Otani Y, Shimada Y, Takahashi F, Kubota T; GIST Guideline Subcommittee. Clinical practice guidelines for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) in Japan: English version. Int J Clin Oncol. 2008 Oct;13(5):416-30. doi: 10.1007/s10147-008-0798-7. Epub 2008 Oct 23.
PMID: 18946752RESULTCasali PG, Blay JY, Abecassis N, Bajpai J, Bauer S, Biagini R, Bielack S, Bonvalot S, Boukovinas I, Bovee JVMG, Boye K, Brodowicz T, Buonadonna A, De Alava E, Dei Tos AP, Del Muro XG, Dufresne A, Eriksson M, Fedenko A, Ferraresi V, Ferrari A, Frezza AM, Gasperoni S, Gelderblom H, Gouin F, Grignani G, Haas R, Hassan AB, Hindi N, Hohenberger P, Joensuu H, Jones RL, Jungels C, Jutte P, Kasper B, Kawai A, Kopeckova K, Krakorova DA, Le Cesne A, Le Grange F, Legius E, Leithner A, Lopez-Pousa A, Martin-Broto J, Merimsky O, Messiou C, Miah AB, Mir O, Montemurro M, Morosi C, Palmerini E, Pantaleo MA, Piana R, Piperno-Neumann S, Reichardt P, Rutkowski P, Safwat AA, Sangalli C, Sbaraglia M, Scheipl S, Schoffski P, Sleijfer S, Strauss D, Strauss SJ, Hall KS, Trama A, Unk M, van de Sande MAJ, van der Graaf WTA, van Houdt WJ, Frebourg T, Gronchi A, Stacchiotti S; ESMO Guidelines Committee, EURACAN and GENTURIS. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: ESMO-EURACAN-GENTURIS Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2022 Jan;33(1):20-33. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.005. Epub 2021 Sep 21. No abstract available.
PMID: 34560242RESULTBaysal B, Masri OA, Eloubeidi MA, Senturk H. The role of EUS and EUS-guided FNA in the management of subepithelial lesions of the esophagus: A large, single-center experience. Endosc Ultrasound. 2017 Sep-Oct;6(5):308-316. doi: 10.4103/2303-9027.155772.
PMID: 26365993RESULTDaimaru Y, Kido H, Hashimoto H, Enjoji M. Benign schwannoma of the gastrointestinal tract: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study. Hum Pathol. 1988 Mar;19(3):257-64. doi: 10.1016/s0046-8177(88)80518-5.
PMID: 3126126RESULTMekras A, Krenn V, Perrakis A, Croner RS, Kalles V, Atamer C, Grutzmann R, Vassos N. Gastrointestinal schwannomas: a rare but important differential diagnosis of mesenchymal tumors of gastrointestinal tract. BMC Surg. 2018 Jul 25;18(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0379-2.
PMID: 30045739RESULTLauricella S, Valeri S, Masciana G, Gallo IF, Mazzotta E, Pagnoni C, Costanza S, Falcone L, Benvenuto D, Caricato M, Capolupo GT. What About Gastric Schwannoma? A Review Article. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2021 Mar;52(1):57-67. doi: 10.1007/s12029-020-00456-2.
PMID: 32964322RESULTKaraca C, Turner BG, Cizginer S, Forcione D, Brugge W. Accuracy of EUS in the evaluation of small gastric subepithelial lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Apr;71(4):722-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.019. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
PMID: 20171632RESULTHwang JH, Saunders MD, Rulyak SJ, Shaw S, Nietsch H, Kimmey MB. A prospective study comparing endoscopy and EUS in the evaluation of GI subepithelial masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Aug;62(2):202-8. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(05)01567-1.
PMID: 16046979RESULTMinoda Y, Chinen T, Osoegawa T, Itaba S, Haraguchi K, Akiho H, Aso A, Sumida Y, Komori K, Ogino H, Ihara E, Ogawa Y. Superiority of mucosal incision-assisted biopsy over ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in diagnosing small gastric subepithelial lesions: a propensity score matching analysis. BMC Gastroenterol. 2020 Jan 21;20(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12876-020-1170-2.
PMID: 31964357RESULTde Moura DTH, McCarty TR, Jirapinyo P, Ribeiro IB, Flumignan VK, Najdawai F, Ryou M, Lee LS, Thompson CC. EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling versus FNA in the diagnosis of subepithelial lesions: a large multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Jul;92(1):108-119.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.02.021. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
PMID: 32105712RESULTOsoegawa T, Minoda Y, Ihara E, Komori K, Aso A, Goto A, Itaba S, Ogino H, Nakamura K, Harada N, Makihara K, Tsuruta S, Yamamoto H, Ogawa Y. Mucosal incision-assisted biopsy versus endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with a rapid on-site evaluation for gastric subepithelial lesions: A randomized cross-over study. Dig Endosc. 2019 Jul;31(4):413-421. doi: 10.1111/den.13367. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
PMID: 30723945RESULTJoensuu H. Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Hum Pathol. 2008 Oct;39(10):1411-9. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2008.06.025.
PMID: 18774375RESULTShah P, Gao F, Edmundowicz SA, Azar RR, Early DS. Predicting malignant potential of gastrointestinal stromal tumors using endoscopic ultrasound. Dig Dis Sci. 2009 Jun;54(6):1265-9. doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0484-7. Epub 2008 Aug 29.
PMID: 18758957RESULTChen T, Xu L, Dong X, Li Y, Yu J, Xiong W, Li G. The roles of CT and EUS in the preoperative evaluation of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors larger than 2 cm. Eur Radiol. 2019 May;29(5):2481-2489. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5945-6. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
PMID: 30617491RESULTChen H, Xu Z, Huo J, Liu D. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection for simultaneous esophageal and cardia submucosal tumors originating from the muscularis propria layer (with video). Dig Endosc. 2015 Jan;27(1):155-8. doi: 10.1111/den.12227. Epub 2014 Jan 20.
PMID: 24444087RESULTHe G, Wang J, Chen B, Xing X, Wang J, Chen J, He Y, Cui Y, Chen M. Feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors treatment and value of endoscopic ultrasonography in pre-operation assess and post-operation follow-up: a prospective study of 224 cases in a single medical center. Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4206-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4729-1. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
PMID: 26823060RESULTHirai K, Kuwahara T, Furukawa K, Kakushima N, Furune S, Yamamoto H, Marukawa T, Asai H, Matsui K, Sasaki Y, Sakai D, Yamada K, Nishikawa T, Hayashi D, Obayashi T, Komiyama T, Ishikawa E, Sawada T, Maeda K, Yamamura T, Ishikawa T, Ohno E, Nakamura M, Kawashima H, Ishigami M, Fujishiro M. Artificial intelligence-based diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions on endoscopic ultrasonography images. Gastric Cancer. 2022 Mar;25(2):382-391. doi: 10.1007/s10120-021-01261-x. Epub 2021 Nov 16.
PMID: 34783924RESULTByrne MF, Chapados N, Soudan F, Oertel C, Linares Perez M, Kelly R, Iqbal N, Chandelier F, Rex DK. Real-time differentiation of adenomatous and hyperplastic diminutive colorectal polyps during analysis of unaltered videos of standard colonoscopy using a deep learning model. Gut. 2019 Jan;68(1):94-100. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314547. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
PMID: 29066576RESULTYang X, Wang H, Dong Q, Xu Y, Liu H, Ma X, Yan J, Li Q, Yang C, Li X. An artificial intelligence system for distinguishing between gastrointestinal stromal tumors and leiomyomas using endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy. 2022 Mar;54(3):251-261. doi: 10.1055/a-1476-8931. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
PMID: 33827140RESULTOh CK, Kim T, Cho YK, Cheung DY, Lee BI, Cho YS, Kim JI, Choi MG, Lee HH, Lee S. Convolutional neural network-based object detection model to identify gastrointestinal stromal tumors in endoscopic ultrasound images. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Dec;36(12):3387-3394. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15653. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
PMID: 34369001RESULTNiikura R, Aoki T, Shichijo S, Yamada A, Kawahara T, Kato Y, Hirata Y, Hayakawa Y, Suzuki N, Ochi M, Hirasawa T, Tada T, Kawai T, Koike K. Artificial intelligence versus expert endoscopists for diagnosis of gastric cancer in patients who have undergone upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2022 Aug;54(8):780-784. doi: 10.1055/a-1660-6500. Epub 2022 May 4.
PMID: 34607377RESULTLiu J, Huang J, Song Y, He Q, Fang W, Wang T, Zheng Z, Liu W. Differentiating Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors From Leiomyomas of Upper Digestive Tract Using Convolutional Neural Network Model by Endoscopic Ultrasonography. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul 1;58(6):574-579. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001907.
PMID: 37646533RESULTLu Y, Chen L, Wu J, Er L, Shi H, Cheng W, Chen K, Liu Y, Qiu B, Xu Q, Feng Y, Tang N, Wan F, Sun J, Zhi M. Artificial intelligence in endoscopic ultrasonography: risk stratification of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2023 May 30;16:17562848231177156. doi: 10.1177/17562848231177156. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 37274299RESULTSeven G, Silahtaroglu G, Kochan K, Ince AT, Arici DS, Senturk H. Use of Artificial Intelligence in the Prediction of Malignant Potential of Gastric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Jan;67(1):273-281. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-06830-9. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
PMID: 33547537RESULTKline A, Wang H, Li Y, Dennis S, Hutch M, Xu Z, Wang F, Cheng F, Luo Y. Multimodal machine learning in precision health: A scoping review. NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Nov 7;5(1):171. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00712-8.
PMID: 36344814RESULTKim SY, Shim KN, Lee JH, Lim JY, Kim TO, Choe AR, Tae CH, Jung HK, Moon CM, Kim SE, Jung SA. Comparison of the Diagnostic Ability of Endoscopic Ultrasonography and Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Gastric Subepithelial Tumors. Clin Endosc. 2019 Nov;52(6):565-573. doi: 10.5946/ce.2019.019. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
PMID: 31311912RESULTLefort C, Gupta V, Lisotti A, Palazzo L, Fusaroli P, Pujol B, Gincul R, Fumex F, Palazzo M, Napoleon B. Diagnosis of gastric submucosal tumors and estimation of malignant risk of GIST by endoscopic ultrasound. Comparison between B mode and contrast-harmonic mode. Dig Liver Dis. 2021 Nov;53(11):1486-1491. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.06.013. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
PMID: 34272196RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 2, 2025
First Posted
July 22, 2025
Study Start
July 28, 2025
Primary Completion
March 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Last Updated
July 31, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share